Senator Feinstein Revives Stupid Idea That Internet Companies Are 'Materially Supporting Terrorism' If ISIS Members Use Their Sites
from the not-how-it-works dept
Last year, FBI Director James Comey floated a ridiculous idea that retweeting ISIS tweets could be seen as "material support" for terrorism. Indeed, an American teenager got sentenced to 11 years in jail for pro-ISIS tweets, with the "material support" being that some of those tweets linked to pages that taught people how to use Bitcoin. Some have taken this idea even further, and argued that internet companies can be slapped with "material support for terrorism" claims or charges if they let ISIS members or other terrorists make use of their services.This is ridiculous for many, many reasons, not the least of which is that (like in the encryption debate) it seems to presume that there's some algorithm to magically determine who is good (not a terrorist) and who is bad (terrorist!). And just like ridiculous and impossible arguments for "kicking ISIS off the open web" -- it would be ridiculously counterproductive. Not only would it be ridiculously costly to internet companies, but it would actually take away a major source of intelligence about terrorist groups, since they often reveal useful things on social media.
But guess who's seriously thinking about looking to see if it's possible to slap "material support of terrorism" charges on internet companies? Why, it's a Senator who actually is supposed to be representing many of their interests as California companies, Senator Dianne Feinstein. Jenna McLaughlin, a national security reporter for The Intercept, noted that Feinstein floated the idea this week, as if Feinstein had just thought of it:
DiFi: have we tried slapping material support charges on companies for letting terrorists use their services?
— Jenna McLaughlin (@JennaMC_Laugh) March 9, 2016
I heard that terrorists use hotels, credit cards, and phones, too. We're going to need a lot of indictments. https://t.co/N6HsYIz2Tb
— Jameel Jaffer (@JameelJaffer) March 9, 2016
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: dianne feinstein, first amendment, intermediary liability, internet companies, isis, material s upport, material support for terrorism, terrorism
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: also using roads, electricity etc
The schools are teaching the kids to read, so they are also in on the conspiracy to train terrorists.
Finally we had better arrest the last few presidents and CIA directors, as pretty well every anti-West terrorist organisation in existence today was funded or trained either directly or indirectly by the US administration.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Feinstein hates the internet because that's where people like to expose her for the two-faced, hypocritical idiot she is. (The car, clothing, electricity and gasoline companies don't do that or she would be after them too)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
lol
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Oh, wait. I think the answer actually is, Yes.
Which is to say, not at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Di Fi provides material support for terrorisim
Don't think that is going to be the outcome she was expecting...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Dianne Feinstein has broken her oath to defend the Constitution by supporting the idea that certain groups of individuals do not have the right to free speech. I believe that makes her a traitor.
ISIS members only wish they could terrorize as good as Dianne Feinstein.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Propaganda
I believe we are at a cross roads.
TIIP/TPP, torture, attacks on the occupy movements, spreads in nations that were considered to be "good guys". Attacks on common citizens and students that once were a trait of dictatorships. And a lot of oblivious people.
At the same time, SOPA did show that the citizens might reign in the regime in USA and other western nations. This gives hope.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Think Futurama...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You're thinking too small........
If letting terrorists use your website, app, hardware [think encrypted iPhone] means that you can be charged with providing material support for terrorism, them they don't need to rely on the All Writs Act.
Just like any other completely ethical and above board plea deal, if you unlock this iPhone, then maybe we won't have you arrested for providing material support for terrorism.
The government operates on many levels and is willing to play the long game....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Political Material Support
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Political Material Support
then voters are materially supporting stupidity when they vote for Feinstein.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fox News supports terrorists!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So Few Bell Towers and Grassy Knolls...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Terrorists Use Guns And Bombs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Terrorists Use Guns And Bombs
We want someone that is illoyal enough to go to war against their own nation, aggressive enough to topple governments, murderous enough that they kill enough to seize power for themselves in entire regions or nations; but otherwise loyal docile peaceful serfs!
This time it will work better!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The government materially supports terrorists too
Living in Silicon Valley, I am embarrassed that she is my "representative".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The government materially supports terrorists too
Just because someone works in high technology does not mean they are not mentally high when it comes to politics. You will find that people like corrupt politicians... well as long as that corrupt politician does them favors.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
By all means, let's do that
So let's not waste time with ISIS. Let's focus on a far more deadly terrorist organization -- one that's been around for over a century and a half. One that has killed thousands of Americans (and that number may be an underestimate by an order of magnitude). One that maimed, raped, mutilated, and tortured many more. One that has destroyed property on a large scale. One that is still a potent and dangerous organization. One that has recently been considerably emboldened by the rhetoric of a leading Presidential candidate.
I'm talking about the Klan, of course.
Which is of course not on DiFi's radar because they don't (usually) go after white people -- and because it's easier for DiFi to grandstand about oh-so-scary ISIS on the other side of the world than to confront the racism in her own state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: By all means, let's do that
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: By all means, let's do that
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: By all means, let's do that
- Is this a quote from DiFi or the KKK? You decide.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Feinstein is a very good example of the blatant hypocrisy that runs the American government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The actions of Congress provide material support to a huge number of sins in the world.
We can call them out about their stupidity, but it appears this no longer works. See Also: Candidate Trump.
Actions of Congress have placed many citizens in jeopardy merely because they think they might lose a vote.
We have a resurgence in diseases we claimed we beat... because they refused to take on the anti-vax lobby.
We have tons of people in jail because they refuse to honestly look at the drug problem & keep wasting resources in a 'war' that is unwinnable.
We have shitty infrastructure because of giving tax breaks to corporations who buy their influence.
We have leaders who place themselves above the laws they inflict on others.
We have them pushing the country towards an Orwellian nightmare because a movie plot tells them its possible to spy enough to stop all the bad things.
They provide material support to undermine country, shouldn't they go first?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When WBC can exercise their free speech (though i may disagree with it) is considered an American virtue, but supporting (even loosely) is un-american, there is something VERY VERY VERY wrong with the system.
There is a difference between giving material support, ie. giving material. support. like guns, and bombs, and such, as opposed to giving immaterial support, such as tweets, blog posts, etc.
Sounds like there could be a technicality on that teenager.
and feinstein is an idiot, every time she opens her mouth, she proves it more and more.
also Welcome to the Red Scare 3.0
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Material support
Yes. And Westboro Baptist Church often go beyond speach, making problems at funerals of fallen gay soldiers and such.
The US regime is scared of a spontaneous regime change. The citizens have reason to be discontent. Most of the citizens know they were shafted in the "to big to fail" bailout. The last thing the regime needs is someone saying concentration camps is bad, or being a possible rallying point against the regime ... because the US regime has lost the moral high ground. There is nothing the regime can say to counter the sentiment.
The police is too scared to do their job properly. And much of their budget comes from looting the public, giving fines for walking strangely, for sitting on a milk crate, for sagging, ... .
This gives a perverse result, where police officers that actually does their job is an expense, while looters generate surplus.
Prosecuting twitter users, sifting through private teen sexting communication, and manufacturing plots is perverse in other ways too. Though it is safe and rewarding for bent cops. It were not what the west was about.
And then the US regime gives actual material support to the bat shit crazy fundamentalists in north east Libya.
The US domestic and foreign policy makes as much sense as smoking in a supermarket garage containing a leaking hydrogen fuel cell car!
Sad but true.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Obscurity & Obsolescence
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]