Nothing About The Story Of An Artist Being Threatened With A Lawsuit Over A Painting Of A Small-Dicked Donald Trump Makes Sense
from the huh? dept
The Guardian had a weird story over the weekend claiming that artist Illma Gore is being threatened with a lawsuit if she sells a painting she created of a naked Donald Trump with, well, a less than average sized schlong (and I use that term, only because Trump apparently likes that word). I won't post an image of the painting. The Guardian has the whole thing if you really feel like seeing it. But almost nothing in the story makes any sense at all.The piece by Illma Gore, titled Make America Great Again, depicts Trump with a small penis. It went viral in February after the artist published it on her Facebook page and has since been censored on social media sites and delisted from eBay after the anonymous filing of a Digital Millennium Copyright Act notice threatening to sue Gore.Except, you can't file an anonymous DMCA notice. A key part of the DMCA notice process is that you need to identify the copyrighted work that was infringed, and the notice itself needs to be signed by someone acting on behalf of the copyright owner. In other words, there's no such thing as an anonymous DMCA notice -- not a valid one anyway.
Second, there's no copyright issue here at all, most likely. Lots of people jumped to the conclusion that it was Trump or his lawyers who sent the notice. That may well be, as he has a history of being ridiculously litigious over the slightest of insults, but he has no copyright interest in what he looks like. The only way there's a copyright claim here is if another artist painted the same thing first or, perhaps, if the painting was based on a photograph of Trump and the photographer was suing. But if it was just a regular clothed picture of Trump, I'd think that this would pretty obviously be transformative fair use from that photograph.
If it was Trump, he'd have no copyright interest at all. Potentially, his lawyers could, I guess, argue a publicity rights claims, which vary based on different state laws, but that would almost certainly fail as well. And the DMCA has nothing to do with publicity rights.
It's possible that it was just a Trump supporter sending a bogus DMCA to get eBay to take down the image. After all, the article also notes:
... galleries in the US refused to host the piece due to security concerns following threats of violence from Trump’s supporters....But if that's the case, eBay (which has lawyers who should know this stuff) should have easily rejected the DMCA notice as invalid.
[....]
The LA-based artist has received thousands of death threats and travelled to the UK to escape the frenzy....
Perhaps eBay pulled the image for other reasons, and it's just being reported as an "anonymous DMCA notice" because people (and reporters) don't even recognize that the DMCA refers to a specific thing with specific rules. But, in the end, very little about the story makes any sense at all.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, dmca, donald trump, illma gore, painting, publicity rights, takedown
Companies: ebay
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Except
Except for the idea that Trump has a tiny, infinitesimally sized dong, which actually makes every last bit of sense ever....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fake?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fake?
The only other thing I could think of that was not mentioned is maybe the phrase, "Make America Great Again" is maybe registered or trademarked? Even though its pretty generic, if used together with Trump its easily identifiable and may be protected in some manner or another.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fake?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
eBay might have smart lawyers, but they cost money where Becki in accounting can totally read the notices they get and remove posts. Its not like anyone will file an answer, they will just look for another way to list it and pay them another fee. eBay isn't that well known for customer service.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
FUD is wonderful - the truth not so much.....
Techdirt is just going to learn more about how to publish stories with half-truths in the blog in order to cause more sensations.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: FUD is wonderful - the truth not so much.....
I thought FUD was an acronym for Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt.
Where exactly are any of these things in that painting?
If a naked Trump jumped out at me, I would Certainly Doubt Fear had anything to do with it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Makes sense to me
Truly, their nobility and willingness for dishonesty and self-sacrifice for the greater good knows no bounds.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On the other hand -
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Money to be made in small schlongs
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/11/30/nude-stephen-harper-painting-sold_n_8685086.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Money to be made in small schlongs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DMCA
17USC512 does not have a "notice of takedown", merely a "notice of claimed infringement". Content providers have only the incentive of NOT-removing their "safe-harbor" if they take appropriate responses, of which taking content down is merely one of several options.
However, if you followed the Viacom v Youtube case you're aware that those "safe-harbor" provisions don't allow you to early remove a case (ala a motion for summary judgement, or as you'd see in a SLAPP cas) but rather must be litigated to its eventual conclusion/settlement.
The DMCA safe-harbor is a joke. It's not a funny one either. Most ISPs with half a brain disregard any of the process OR fall on the other side of taking down everything (e.g. youtube). Either way, if someone is determined to file suit, they will. What you do in response to the "notice of claimed infringement" is almost irrelevant.
Ehud
* Mike Masnick used it because Donald Trump uses it, so I used it in the same context. Also it's a perfectly fine word to describe OTHER people's private parts because "schlong" includes "long" but Donald's would be "schshort."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
SLAPP relevant?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It never ceases to amaze me
Trump has done much to draw people's ire. But Jesus Christ, be an adult about things. It's embarrassing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It never ceases to amaze me
But* Great Flying Spaghetti Monster, be a realist about things. It's embarrassing when you're dressing down everyone on this topic and have to invoke your personal deity.
Ehud
*Never start a proper English sentence with a conjunction.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The expected response:
Listen, dimwit, How juvenile and sophomoric people act when it comes to nudity....
(I'm annoyed about our society's hang-ups about sexuality and nudity, but I don't think Trump's penis size or even whether he has an intact one should be the level of our criticism of him.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The expected response:
...and the Yaley says "I'm so sorry, Sir, but can you tell me where the library is at, a**hole."
Agreed though that Trump's wee wee-wee is of no factor in his opportunity to totally f*** up this country. You're right on that one.
Best
E
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It never ceases to amaze me
I realize it's very old-fashioned of me, but I think it would be nice if presidential campaigns were based on discussion of real issues.
I'm not a Trump supporter, but I have to say that many of the anti-Trump folks are willing to sink so low that they manage to make Trump look good by comparison. And that takes talent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
An comparison of Trump supporters with Terrorists
Compare to the Charlie Hebdo attack over an unflattering depiction of another group's prophet.
So are Trump supporters acting like terrorists?
Yet in the name of protecting us from such terrorists, they want to ban people of a particular religion from entering the US.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: An comparison of Trump supporters with Terrorists
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: An comparison of Trump supporters with Terrorists
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: An comparison of Trump supporters with Terrorists
We haven't had violence yet. Just legal threats.
Of course those do a lot of damage too, in our litigious society.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
listed on eBay?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Options?
They could start a whole new movement: "Schlongers"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
and this was not obvious from the beginning with this dick?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lord Farquaad
He doesn't seem to be a particularly small guy, for someone with such a little-man complex.
Were the unthinkable to happen and Trump were to get into the oval office, his political enemies would pull him apart stomping on that button.
Unless he plans to do the dictator thing and disappear anyone that might have a critical opinion of him.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Defamation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Proposal - Guaranteed top 10 Ranking Google
How are you? Hope you are fine.-
I have been checking your website quite often. It has seen that the main keywords are still not in top 10 rank. You know things of working; I mean the procedure of working has changed a lot.
So I would like to have opportunity to work for you and this time we will bring the keywords to the top 10 spot with guaranteed period.
There is no wondering that it is possible now cause, I have found out that there are few things need to be done for better performances (Some we Discuss, in this email). Let me tell you some of them -
1. Title Tag Optimization
2. Meta Tag Optimization (Description, keyword and etc)
3. Heading Tags Optimization
4. Targeted keywords are not placed into tags
5. Alt / Image tags Optimization
6. Google Publisher is missing
7. Custom 404 Page is missing
8. The Products are not following Structured markup data
9. Website Speed Development (Both Mobile and Desktop)
10. Favicon needs to be changed too.
11. Off –Page SEO work
Lots are pending……………..
You can see these are the things that need to be done properly to make the keywords others to get into the top 10 spot in Google Search & your sales Increase.
Also there is one more thing to mention that you did thousands of links that time for your website, which are considered as spam after Google roll outs several updates of Panda and penguin. We need to remove them too.
Sir/Madam, please give us a chance to fix these errors and we will give you rank on these keywords.
Please let me know if you encounter any problems or if there is anything you need. If this email has reached you by mistake or if you do not wish to take advantage of this free advertising opportunity, please accept my apology for any inconvenience caused and rest assured that you will not be contacted again.
Many thanks for your time and consideration,
Looking forward
Regards
Aditya Agarwal
If you did not wish to receive this, please reply with "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
Disclaimer: This is an advertisement and a promotional mail strictly on the guidelines of CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. We have clearly mentioned the source mail-id of this mail and the subject lines and they are in no way misleading in any form. We have found your mail address through our own efforts on the web search and not through any illegal way. If you find this mail unsolicited, please reply with "unsubscribe" in the subject line and we will take care that you do not receive any further promotional mail.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]