Jesse Jackson Likens FCC Cable Box Reform Plan To 'Snarling Dogs, Water Hoses And Church Bombings'
from the sock-puppetry dept
Back in February the FCC voted to open up the captive cable set top box market to competition, potentially opening the door to better, cheaper hardware, but also putting an end to the $21 billion the cable industry makes annually in set top box rental fees. Shortly thereafter the cable industry responded by pushing an absolute torrent of misleading editorials in newspapers and in websites nationwide. Some of these editorials claim set top box competition will result in privacy, security, or piracy Armageddon. Most try to claim set top box competition is some kind of nefarious plan by Google to freeload on cable's "amazing history of innovation."But the most obnoxious of these editorials have been those trying to claim that the FCC's set top box reform plan will hurt minority communities and diversity. We've long noted how one of the cable industry's favorite lobbying tricks is throwing money at minority groups so they'll parrot bad telecom policy, whether that's supporting the latest merger or opposing net neutrality. In short, many such groups are willing to support policies that actively harm their constituents -- for just the right amount of cash.
Enter Jesse Jackson, who this week penned an Op-ed over at USAToday that right out of the gate starts off on unsteady footing by mentioning the FCC's set top box reform plan in the same breath as "snarling dogs, water hoses and church bombings in the American South":
"National news coverage of the snarling dogs, water hoses and church bombings in the American South were the catalysts to exposing the ugly truths of racism and bigotry in the 1960s. Local news outlets gave new meaning to what the struggle looked like for people on its front lines. That is why a new proposal at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to regulate TV “set top boxes" has raised so much concern."Wait, what? Because history is filled with racism means the FCC's plan to open up the cable set top box market to competition raises concern? If you've actually bothered to read the FCC's proposal (pdf), all the rules would do would require cable companies to take their existing programming -- and make it available to third party hardware using the delivery methods and copy protection of the industry's choice. If anything the move would result in consumers getting access to more diverse programming options than ever before, given it would eliminate the traditional cable box walled garden, and replace it with hardware that nudges consumers in the direction of an ocean of streaming content.
Just like the cable industry (surely coincidental, right?), Jackson tries to claim that the FCC plan would let hardware vendors obtain cable programming "without any compensation":
"Essentially, the FCC is proposing that small and diverse television programmers such as Revolt and Vme TV hand over their television content to third party device manufacturers without any compensation. These companies could then pull networks apart, ignore copyright protections and dismantle the local and national advertising streams that have traditionally supported high quality, multicultural content."Again though, that's not true. Cable customers will still pay cable companies the same high rates for the exact same content lineups using the exact same copy protection, users will just be able to access it via a wider variety of hardware. That's much like how third party hardware (like TiVO) work now, except without the costly and cumbersome CableCARD installation. Jackson (or what ever cable lobbyist ghost writer rented his name for the afternoon) preaches on -- pretending he's engaged in a brave civil rights battle:
"Diversity on television and media still matters as much as it did in the 1960s. While new video platforms and content are being developed, the promise of this new medium will not be an immediate substitute for the current range of images and voices now available on TV. Furthermore, the market is already demonstrating its own agility to change with many new devices, streaming options and services bringing traditional television and Internet video onto our screens seamlessly.Fighting for diversity in programming and media ownership is one thing. Opposing a plan that would actually help diverse communities by making cable cheaper while delivering more diverse content than ever before is something else entirely. Jackson tries to support his shaky position by rattling off a laundry list of politicians and minority groups that oppose the FCC's plan:
"Leaders of the Congressional Black and Hispanic Caucuses have voiced opposition to this proposal; to date, over 80 House Democrats have expressed opposition or serious concerns. Major civil rights organizations, such as the National Urban League and the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), have asked the FCC to pause this proceeding until more empirical data detailing the impacts on diversity is released."And while it's possible a few members of these groups actually believe (or are mislead to believe) the FCC's plan hurts diversity, all Jackson's laundry list of such groups does is highlight just how pervasive this kind of lobbyist dreck has become. Most consumers frankly have no idea that "astroturf" of this type even exists, and as a result many will be convinced that a plan that actually helps them will do them harm thanks to Jackson's missive. Comcast has found this kind of sock puppetry so effective, it now calls its top lobbyist David Cohen the company's "Chief Diversity Officer."
And while this really is nothing short of disinformation, it speaks volumes about the quality of the cable industry's argument -- and its fear of set real top box competition -- that it needs to resort to grotesque, misleading puppetry of this type.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cable box, competition, copyright, diversity, fcc, fud, jesse jackson, open technology, set top boxes
Companies: comcast
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Dear Documentary Film Makers....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Dear Documentary Film Makers....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
-
Jesse is the equivalent of tribe leaders that sold their own people into slavery.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hi Name Was "Muhammad Ali"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hi Name Was "Muhammad Ali"
What part of any of those facts makes a person who refers to his original name a "racist peace of garbage"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hi Name Was "Muhammad Ali"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Right/Wrong, it doesn't matter. The only side he's on is is own. Who are these people giving him a voice? He really needs to disappear.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I can't wait to hear how NHTSA releasing regulations on self-driving cars (against the interest of big auto, for whatever reason) is worse than a thousand years of Jim Crow.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
1) Is Jesse Jackson still relevant anywhere?
2) Does anyone actually believe that Jackson wouldn't sell his soul if it made him a few bucks?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here is what cable companies fear about opening up the set top box market
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Here is what cable companies fear about opening up the set top box market
This takes it to another level, where you don't even need a cable card. They're a pain in the butt to deal with and the cable company's have been fighting that all this time. You need much cheaper systems like ROKU and AppleTV but with Encryption support of whatever Comcast wants to use to protect content but would work on any Box supporting their encryption protocol, now you really have something.
Instead as always, this is nothing but trying to protect their Setup Cablebox rental fee's. Fee's that you pay off the box many times over and still never own it. It's plain as day who's getting screwed. That's the customers, including the POOR PEOPLE who instead could have the option of just buying a cheap Box and no rental fee's.
Really, how dumb do these company's and JJ think people are? I know some people blindly follow them, but I have to think far more don't believe this garbage.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Here is what cable companies fear about opening up the set top box market
Considering that we're talking about people who nominated Donald Trump on one side and Hillary Clinton on the other...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In other news, water is wet, the Pope is Catholic and traffic in DC is congested this morning.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What if the people who saw the snarling dogs & fire hoses turned on people believed the party line that they were just being uppity negros? They wouldn't have the full picture of what was actually happening, much like Rev. Jackson talking about a topic he knows nothing about. He is selling his image to try and paint this as a whitey is gonna force us back into the dark old times unless we allow the cable companies to maintain their total unchecked control over set top boxes.
I guess the master who we know is going to beat us down is better than a chance that the new master could be as bad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That comes from close association with other politicians. An activista can stick to his principles, a politician has to compromise them to stay in power.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Godwin?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is a big reason why these "captured" regulatory agencies, and the rest of the government's bloated bureaucracy, will remain a permanent fixture. They tend to be staffed by the sons and daughters of politicians and lobbyists (not that there's any real difference) -- especially racial minorities. Anyone who tries to do something about the inbred corruption and widespread nepotism within the halls of Washington gets labeled a racist and a bigot.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Does anyone think Jesse Jackson is still relevant?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
racist cable
Step 1: open standards for cable boxes
Step 2: ????
Step 3: the most racism ever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Typical
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Buy an HD antennae, ditch the cable box
National news coverage of the snarling dogs, water hoses and church bombings in the American South were the catalysts to exposing the ugly truths of racism and bigotry in the 1960s. Local news outlets gave new meaning to what the struggle looked like for people on its front lines.
To continue:
This is why I'm telling everyone to go to Walmart, pay a one-time fee for an HD antennae, and get all the local channels for free without needing to pay monthly fees for a cable box.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Buy an HD antennae, ditch the cable box
My year of 105Mbps for $50 was up and it jumped to over $80 just for Internet ONLY. Now I'm on a new deal, 75Mbps service which is still more then fast enough, but it includes HBO and their Streaming service and a basic cable Box as local channels. No fee on the box. I don't have it hooked up as I'd have to run a cable for it, so who cares I have my Antenna anyway which picks up more channels. I can use the HBOGo app on my many devices, and Comcasts Streaming service, I forgot what it's called, I don't care about. This cost me just over $45 a month. So it's CHEAPER for slightly slower Internet and free HBO. I really only wanted Internet ONLY but that was more expensive!!!
They really are trying to do whatever they can to protect their TV business and not just become some dumb Internet pipe. A year from now, I'll see what new deal I can get to keep my costs down.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I HAV E TO SAY IT...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Saying A Is Is Bad As B Also Says B Is No Worse Than A
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Saying A Is Is Bad As B Also Says B Is No Worse Than A
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So what you're trying to tell us is...
ABBA is behind all of this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So what you're trying to tell us is...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cable sucks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cable sucks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]