Appeals Court Gives Big Loss To Record Labels In Their Quixotic Lawsuit Against Vimeo For Lipdubs

Chattanooga Mayor Says City's Gigabit Network (Which Comcast Tried To Kill) To Thank For City's Revival

from the get-the-hell-out-of-the-way dept

Thu, Jun 16th 2016 10:45am — Karl Bode

While hardline free marketeers and incumbent ISPs often try to paint city-owned broadband networks as the pinnacle of government-sponsored disaster, Chattanooga Mayor Andy Berke this week credited the city utility's gigabit broadband service as a major contributing factor for the city's re-invention. The Chattanooga Electric Power Board (EPB) is a city-owned utility that offers broadband speeds up to 10 Gbps to locals; a recent Consumer Reports survey noting that outside of Google Fiber, EPB has the only truly positive consumer satisfaction ratings among the 30 national ISPs ranked by the magazine:

"The results were ugly for value, too, with 28 of the 30 TV service providers earning our lowest score. The two exceptions—municipal broadband company EPB Fiber Optics-Chattanooga and Google Fiber—each earned high scores from the survey respondents. Both services offer super-fast 1-gigabit-per-second (Gbps) speeds. EPB Fiber Optics-Chattanooga ranked highest in the survey for overall satisfaction, edging out Google Fiber and cable company Armstrong."

In areas where the private market has failed, public or public/private partnerships have proven to be an effective way (if designed and funded properly) in shoring up coverage gaps for what has become an essential utility. Berke this week stated that by doing what local incumbent broadband providers refused to (aka give a damn), the city has been able to attract startups, lower the city's unemployment rate, and change the city's reputation for the better. And while not all of that is solely thanks to broadband, Berke makes it very clear that EPB was a huge part of it:

"It changed our conceptions of who we are and what is possible,” Berke said. “Before we had never thought of ourselves as a technology city."...Downtown has doubled its residents and landlords often advertise gigabit speeds that are included in monthly rents.

“It’s an explosion of growth in our technology sector,” he said. “That has sparked not only this (downtown) living but restaurants and bars and music and the quality of life that truly makes a city interesting, cool, hip, vibrant and energetic."

But if you've been playing along at home, regional incumbents like AT&T and Comcast almost kept EPB's network from ever being built. In 2008 Comcast unsuccessfully sued EPB to prevent the city's plan from taking root. AT&T and Comcast are also behind a state law preventing EPB from expanding, one of nineteen such laws lobbied for by incumbent ISPs to maintain the apathetic broadband status quo.

We've noted how state leaders (like Rep. Patsy Hazlewood, a former AT&T executive) have rushed to the defense of the state's broadband duopoly and their protectionist law. The pretense usually involves these politicians insisting they're just trying to protect taxpayers from themselves, ignoring the fact that letting AT&T and Comcast lawyers literally writing bad state telecom law has resulted in Tennessee being one of the least connected states in the nation.

Tennessee's fealty to regional duopolists recently bubbled over when EPB successfully petitioned the FCC to intervene on their behalf. The FCC is currently in court trying to argue that two such laws -- in both Tennessee and North Carolina -- run in stark contrast to the FCC's stated mission of ensuring even and timely broadband deployment. The FCC hopes that the case sets a legal precedent, resulting in the elimination of similar laws (many of which ban or hinder even public/private partnerships like Google Fiber) falling like dominoes.

But here too loyal Tennessee protectors of broadband sector dysfunction like Marsha Blackburn have tried to argue the FCC is violating state law -- by telling the state which giant corporations can or can't buy protectionist legislation. It's all part of a massive joke that has repeated itself in state after state, where companies like AT&T and Comcast have such a stranglehold over the legislative process, they've effectively codified shitty, uncompetitive broadband into law.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: broadband, chattanooga, competition, innovation, municipal broadband

16 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

That Anonymous Coward (profile), 16 Jun 2016 @ 10:54am

It is nice to see elected officials so cheaply purchased and handing even more money to companies while actively harming those they allegedly represent.

People joke about how we are in the future and why don't we have flying cars yet. Perhaps the real reason we've made so little progress to what could be, is the fealty of our officials to those who pay them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 16 Jun 2016 @ 11:19am
  
  Re:
  Perhaps?
  
  It's a fact. We are our own greatest enemies and irrational fear combined with irrational greed hurts us a lot. We spend far more time talking about what a politician is going to do for us rather than talking about how a politician plans to clean up corruption.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Malcolm Reynolds, 16 Jun 2016 @ 11:01am

burden
I can see you're politicians aren't over burdened with an abundance of ethics and morals.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 16 Jun 2016 @ 11:02am

Purposely keeping citizens in the dark so they can exploit them more easily. Only in a corrupt state
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 16 Jun 2016 @ 1:34pm
  
  Re:
  To be fair, the citizens make it absurdly easy for the politicians to keep them in the dark.
  
  _none_ of this is secret. Most people just can't be bothered to look.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 17 Jun 2016 @ 2:09am
    
    Re: Re:
    A correction, most people are so busy making a living, raising kids etc. that they do not have time to look.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 16 Jun 2016 @ 11:06am

"Rep. Patsy Hazlewood, a former AT&T executive"

The perfect first name to summarize this representative's actions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 16 Jun 2016 @ 11:12am

Another success-story for municipal broadband (spotted on Slashdot):

http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/06/what-if-switching-fiber-isps-was-as- easy-as-clicking-a-mouse/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 16 Jun 2016 @ 3:15pm

Define "failed"
In areas where the private market has failed...

That all depends on how you define "failed", doesn't it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 16 Jun 2016 @ 7:06pm
  
  Re: Define "failed"
  “Failed” as in “not providing people with what they want”.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 17 Jun 2016 @ 8:59am
    
    Re: Re: Define "failed"
    Which people? AT&T's owners seem to be getting what *they* want.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 16 Jun 2016 @ 4:03pm

with the true facts now on hand, why are those politicians who still bat for Comcast and others not taken to task over what they do, ie, continuously condemn the cities that bring their own broadband into play and equally as continuously, bring in new laws that try to screw those cities and back the incumbents, when they know what they are doing is wrong and underhanded? i appreciate that members of Congress are extremely powerful people but surely even they shouldn't be above the law?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 16 Jun 2016 @ 6:13pm

My folks live in Bradley County, adjacent to Hamilton County where EPB operates. Local and state politicians have vigorously opposed EPB expanding to their area despite horrible, expensive service from legacy cable and telephone companies. I'm going to advise them to set up a crowdfunding campaign to pay off local and state politicians the way the cable/telcos do. Any recommendations about what crowdfunding site might be amenable to funding flagrant bribery as a symbolic statement, or do I have to create my own?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Atkray (profile), 16 Jun 2016 @ 9:31pm
  
  Re:
  I think you may have something there, its just a question of where to get it hosted.
  
  Crowd sourced lobbyist for hire.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jim, 17 Jun 2016 @ 6:05am

But:
I hate to disagree, or agree. It's not a lack of time, amount of kids, it's a lack of choices. All established parties have one agenda. To gather money to elect a candidate. Who do you get the money from? What agenda do the voters have? What agenda do those who pay for the election have? Is the better question.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ninja (profile), 17 Jun 2016 @ 12:02pm

So it means that when service providers get in to actually compete they tend to actually deliver quality. Go figure, this competition thing seems to be awesome.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]