Led Zeppelin Wins Copyright Case Over Stairway To Heaven
from the copyright-law-is-random dept
Back in April, we talked about the fact that the lawsuit against Led Zeppelin's Robert Plant and Jimmy Page for copyright infringement over "Stairway to Heaven" was moving forward to a jury trail, and how ridiculous it was. As we noted, the song was written in 1970, and it's a bit crazy to argue after all these decades that there's infringement. But, more importantly, the similarities between Stairway and the Spirit song "Taurus" were just a few common notes that were predated by many artists, including Bach's Bouree in E Minor. Still, as we'd seen with the Blurred Lines case, when copyright cases go to juries over song similarities, they often turn out wacky. The intricacies of copyright law are tossed out the window and often "hey, these sound similar" seems to win out.So it's fairly surprising, honestly, that the jury unanimously sided with Led Zeppelin in this case, saying that while the copyright on Taurus was valid and they believed that Plant and Page had likely heard the song (the two bands toured together, even though Jimmy Page testified that he didn't believe he'd ever heard "Taurus"), there was not substantial similarity between the two songs.
Again, this is pretty surprising, because if you take an unsophisticated audience and just play the clips of the two tracks next to each other, it's not hard to hear them and say "sure, those are kinda similar." About the best explanation I've seen for why the jury decided this way in this case, was that the jury just liked Page and Plant more than the plaintiff -- Michael Skidmore -- who was the "trustee" of the estate of Randy Wolfe, the deceased musician who wrote Taurus. But, when copyright decisions are being made based on who's more likable, that doesn't sound like a particularly functional copyright system.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, jimmy page, juries, led zeppelin, randy wolfe, robert plant, stairway to heaven, taurus
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Because Zeppelin rules
At least it is a win for music in general. All music, especially blues, is based on previous music. There are a limited number of notes, a limited number of chords that sound good, and limited ways to combine them. If Taurus was about a woman who was climbing a staircase, maybe there would have been a case.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Because Zeppelin rules
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Because Zeppelin rules
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I Wonder...
You HAVE to appreciate the prophetic irony of this song and the case over it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I Wonder...
(Hopefully, there's still time to change the road we're on :P ).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Two thirds of thejury lost their virginity to Stairway
Still, right rulings for the wrong reasons perpetuate the notion that the system works, and that twelve ordinary joes can exercise sound judgement and ignore a shitton of human bias.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's not like there's any hard evidence to judge on, here. In absence of any legal standards you're asking a jury to go with "sounds too close to." It's an entirely subjective verdict, because that's all the jury has to go on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You're a fucking idiot, Masnick.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If so, that makes you the idiot in my eyes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Decisions based on which side is more likable
There is an awful lot of hatred for people based on incidental or aesthetic traits (e.g. attractiveness, race, religion, etc).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Decisions based on which side is more likable
Perhaps, but from what I've seen it looks like the problem with juries isn't the level of intelligence of humans generally, but that attorneys tend to try to keep thoughtful, intelligent people off of juries, and that juries are subjected to shameless manipulation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Decisions based on which side is more likable
And their susceptibility to manipulation is part of the stupid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In this case, there's absolutely no question that they took the original song Taurus for the opening guitar in Stairway to Heaven (and then tweaked the notes enough to get away with it). As much as their behavior is in poor taste, opening notes aren't exactly the same, and the rest of Stairway to Heaven is still transformative enough that, as much as it was poor form of them not to even credit them (something like "inspired by Taurus" or "based on Taurus"), the song is clearly something very different than Taurus, so this verdict is to be expected.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Dude, it's a chromatic walkdown, the other strings picked in such a way that one might pick them if there are where they are on a standard-tuning guitar, which they are. There are only 11 notes in Western music, and this is four of them, in order, downward. Yet, still picked differently by Zep than in Taurus. Not to mention that the riff doesn't appear in Taurus until after 45 seconds of mindnumbingly dull strings (I'm surprised anyone ever made it to the riff).
So I don't this is the circumstance to speak in absolutes .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
This argument is getting so old.
As others have noted (ha!) - it's a common chord progession that both ultimately used as inspiration.
But as LeVar would say... "Don't take my word for it"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlgqkno2hB8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYSFuWU7GQs&featur e=youtu.be&t=35s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKpbJ5Kjy2I
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
probably the history of music is largely that of following inspiration in one's own way.
my career has been to design aircraft parts and assemblies. i'm thankful nobody ever once suggested i couldn't or shouldn't look at what someone else did in a similar circumstance. it's how we do things. i don't think i ever quite copied something. always there are complications. but the people before us patted down the grass for us to pass through. same with art. same with music. same with life.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's already ludicrous to assume twelve average people would be qualified to parse by ear distinctions better left to people with a knowledge of music theory and a firm grasp on the differences between scales, diatonic chord progressions, melodies, harmonies, etc, but it seems absolutely insane to expect the jury to render a verdict by reading sheet music. Most musicians can't even read fucking sheet music, for crying out loud.
And the amount of trickery there could get diabolical. I can notate a piece of music on a treble G clef, then rewrite it exactly the same except on a bass F or C clef and probably dupe a non-musician, or even an untrained musician, into believing that I'm showing them music for two completely different songs. Or, since "Stairway" is in the key of A minor (I believe, from memory), I could write it on a staff for Bb major and use natural notations (a symbol on the staff that informs the musician when notes are going to be out of the established scale) to keep it in the correct key of A minor.
Granted, the sheet music in any of these alternate situations would be an absolute mess, and clear communication is the point of sheet music, so no one would ever write music in these ways. But, these convoluted ways of notating the intervals between notes would still be technically "correct." The best kind of correct.
N.B. I am happy this case went the way it did, and this is a fair verdict in my opinion, but I was stunned to hear the claim that laypeople were making this call by reading sheet music they would have little understanding of.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Musicians were brought into the courtroom to play each of the songs live to the jury.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ongoing whining
Take a breath or ten. Just sayin.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the jury just liked Page and Plant more than the plaintiff
Big time in the u.s.. Emotion
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If I were on a jury, asked to decide a case like this, I wouldn't vote on likeability, but I would certainly be biased against the trustee on general principle. The guy who contributed to our culture is gone; go out and do something worthwhile yourself if you want to be rewarded for it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]