You'll Never Guess Which Portmanteau Everyone Is Suddenly Trying To Trademark
from the actually-you-probably-will dept
It had to happen. There was no avoiding it. It's quite common for individuals, and sometimes even businesses, to surf the wave of a popular news cycle and attempt to translate some story into a trademark to exploit. A good percentage of the time, this is done as something of a short-term squatting attempt, where some word or phrase becomes suddenly popular and someone races to trademark it in order to license or sell it to another entity. Other times, it's simply done to capitalize on the sudden popularity of a word or phrase directly.
You already know where this is going. Yes, the "Brexit" trademarks are starting to pour in, almost literally in the case of Sam Adams Boston Lager maker Boston Beer.
The Boston Beer, the maker of Samuel Adams Boston Lager, is seeking to trademark “Brexit” as a name of a hard cider. A patent attorney from Houston has also filed an application to register “Texit,” a term coined as the Texas version of Brexit. That application covers hunting apparel, T-shirts and baseball caps.
Yes, as the world reacts to Britain riding a wave of false-promises and barely-disguised tribalism towards an EU exit stage-right-into-an-economic-freefall, American companies are swiftly trying to lock up the word-mash used to describe this exodus for their own stupid business purposes. And, based on the findings of Alex Montgomery, it appears these applications were filed even as the results of the vote were in doubt.
On June 24th, as the world was contemplating the consequences of the United Kingdom's "Brexit" vote to leave the European Union, others were filing applications to register the term as a trademark. One of those entities was the Boston Beer Company (the owner of the Sam Adams trademark). Applications to register BREXIT as a trademark were also filed on June 24th by an individual in Chicago in Class 025 for clothing and by a company in Colorado inClass 005 for dietary and nutritional supplements.
For Boston Beer's proposed Brexit Hard Cider, the details for the rollout of this drink appears to elude even those within the brewery.
A Boston Beer spokeswoman couldn’t say exactly what the plans were for Brexit cider. She told Law Blog that the company has worked with cider makers from the U.K. and sources some apples from the country for its “Angry Orchard” line of hard cider.
That's quite a reach to rationalize trying to trademark a suddenly popular term coming out of an international news cycle. Let's be clear on this point: this kind of trademarking is goddamned annoying. First, it makes a mockery of what for most of us are very real and serious issues. The Brexit story is one that the entire world ought to be paying very serious attention to, because the vote was not only historic, but its consequences, whatever they are, ought to be instructive to other nations that want to use nationlism to propel this sort of agenda.
But on top of that, exactly what does any of this kind of opportunistic trademarking have to do with the purpose of trademark law? To be clear, all of these trademark applications are likely entirely legal. But that doesn't change how at odds they are with the purpose of trademark to begin with. The idea behind trademarks is that they serve as a source-identifier for particular companies. The general idea would be to come up with a term for a brand or business, trademark it, then grow it into recognition as associated with the trademark holder. These attempts reverse the order, attempting to ride a wave of an already well-known word or term and then trying to force association with brands through trademark.
And that's really lame.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: beer, brexit, trademark
Companies: samuel adams
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
This is what trademarks stand for:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good brand management.
We're bottom feeders who don't have a single original idea of our own so we'll just glom onto any passing fad to make sure we can find a way to profit off of it until we see a cooler fad to grab and then dump the old one... but still keep holding onto it because its ours even if we aren't using it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
What's wrong about a company associating its brand with the way that companies actually do business?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Public businesses can have trademarks. In fact trademark is not exclusive to any particular economic principle. I has been used by Monarchs, Senates, Black Smiths, Bakeries... fuck it all...
Fucking tool, Get off the internet and take the rest of the fucking rabble with you! It's about to get a whole long quieter up in here!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Sadly Hillary can't use hexit as I'm sure that one is already taken.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Whatever they are" being the operative word here. We still don't know, in any meaningful way, what the consequences are, because not enough time has passed for any but the most trivial and short-term of consequences to have actually come about.
Many times, something that looks good at first turns out to be bad in the long run, and vice versa.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Many times, something that looks good at first turns out to be bad in the long run, and vice versa."
Exactly correct. I have my suspicions as to whether a retreat from globalism and regionalism will work out well or poorly for the retreaters, but we don't know specifically yet how this will work out for the UK, which is why I phrased it in the way you quoted.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The carrot: come and have some lovely trade!
The stick: if you know what's good for your economy!
If you're going to retreat from globalism (the UK actually prefers to sell out to the US than the EU) you need to have a plan for trading regionally or you're screwed. Given that the IMF has imposed austerity measures on every country taking loans from it, any such deal would be very one-sided. Yes, we'd get cheap sugar-snap peas from Kenya, but how many Kenyans can afford to buy British-made cars?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They tried to trademark Boston Strong (which is just in poor taste, and luckily the judge in that case saw it that way too.) And they tried to sue a guy named Sam Adams from running for mayor.
Boston Beer complains a lot they don't get the respect they deserve as a pioneer craft brewer, but when you try to trademark every fad word or phrase, and sue everyone into oblivion you come out looking no better than some of the macrobrewers you try to distance yourself from.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Need help
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ok, I got the ultimate trademark:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Ok, I got the ultimate trademark:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Ok, I got the ultimate trademark:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Other marks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
When did TD switch over to the top-down corporatist side? Is it the result of blindly following some narrative-"These same people are wrong on A, B and C, so I must oppose position D which they support"?? Or the knee-jerk obeisance to the "Our strength is in our diversity" mantra and it's unspoken clause "...in every circumstance, without exception and any questioning this is racist"
I've always been very suspicious when someone presents a position to me that, it is claimed, is correct beyond criticism, analysis or thought. Doesn't seem to bother you, I guess.
Likewise, to present this dispute as if only the Brexit side used wild hyperbole and unquestioning hatred of "the other" must mean you approve of the knee jerk, sky-is-falling,"maybe we really don't like democracy" post-vote hysteria coming from the Remain camp.
Wow. I've always respected TechDirt, but this is just head-shakingly sad...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I heard a rumour
Apparently it will be called the Exit.
Oh wait... I'll get my coat.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I heard a rumour
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Texit Tangent
Oh, please, god, let the Texit" movement succeed! (Now you have to guess whether or not I'm Texan).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Texit Tangent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BRexit becomes BJexit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Quit it with the Trolling
It's not "tribalism" to want legal equality between British people of European descent and those from the rest of the world.
The EU "free movement" principle had severe unintended consequences, including a brutal clamp-down on immigration from other parts of the world, dawn police raids racially-targeting British-Asian-owned businesses, and £20k fines if British-Asians let family help out. This sort of un-British activity had to stop.
http://www.shropshirestar.com/news/2016/03/18/two-restaurant-workers-arrested-in-whitchurch-imm igration-raids/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Quit it with the Trolling
The free movement of people has flooded economically deprived areas with more poor people, leaving the people who were already there to compete with them for services, etc. That was ill-considered altruism from idealists who had not planned for how these new neighbours were going to live in an era of austerity. That, you may find, was the main driver of Brexit.
Had austerity been repealed and proper infrastructure provided to accommodate the newcomers, we would have seen a different result. Complacent people don't complain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]