Police Step Up Arrests For 'Threatening' Social Media Posts In The Wake Of The Dallas Shooting
from the civil-liberties-v.-kneejerking dept
In a move that's sure to only increase the nation's respect for law enforcement, police departments have been arresting people for "threatening" social media posts. This activity follows the tragedy in Dallas, where five police officers were killed by a man armed with a rifle. Naomi LaChance of The Intercept has more details.
Four men in Detroit were arrested over the past week for posts on social media that the police chief called threatening. One tweet that led to an arrest said that Micah Johnson, the man who shot police officers in Dallas last week, was a hero. None of the men have been named, nor have they been charged.
Four more arrests have occurred elsewhere:
Last weekend in Connecticut, police arrested Kurt Vanzuuk after a tip for posts on Facebook that identified Johnson as a hero and called for police to be killed. He was charged with inciting injury to persons or property.
An Illinois woman, Jenesis Reynolds, was arrested for writing in a Facebook post that she would shoot an officer who would pull her over. “I have no problem shooting a cop for simple traffic stop cuz they’d have no problem doing it to me,” she wrote, according to the police investigation. She was charged with disorderly conduct.
In New Jersey, Rolando Medina was arrested and charged with cyber harassment. He allegedly posted on an unidentified form of social media that he would destroy local police headquarters. In Louisiana, Kemonte Gilmore was arrested for an online video where he allegedly threatened a police officer. He was charged with public intimidation.
Arresting people for speech is problematic, especially when the content of the communications doesn't rise to the level of a "true threat." The Supreme Court's Elonis decision says this distinction is important. It's not enough for a person or persons to subjectively view the communication as threatening. It needs to be viewed through the "reasonable person" lens.
In these cases, perception appears to be everything. In the wake of the Dallas shooting, it's entirely normal for police officers to view the world a little differently. But this altered view -- one that's likely to be less skewed as time goes on -- can't be allowed to override the First Amendment and deprive individuals of their freedom to speak, not to mention their actual freedom.
And just as certainly as law enforcement officers and officials are likely to view certain acts of blowhardiness as threatening in the immediate aftermath of a shooting targeting police officers, certain citizens are likely to vent their frustration and anger in particularly stupid ways, but without the intention or ability to carry out the perceived threat. Caution should be exercised on both sides of the interaction. However, those with the power to arrest, detain, and charge citizens for stupidity should be the more cautious of the two parties -- simply because they still hold the power, despite recent events.
Those in power should also take care to carry this out with some sort of consistency, if that's the route they're choosing to take. It can't just be deployed against a bunch of nobodies who mouthed off about their contempt for law enforcement. If this is how it's going to be handled, those who speak with the same rhetoric in defense of law enforcement need to be held accountable. Former congressional rep Joe Walsh tweeted out that this was now "war on Obama" after the Dallas shootings and yet no one showed up at his door to arrest him for threatening the President. It's bad enough that power is being misused to silence criticism of law enforcement violence. It's even worse when this power is deployed in a hypocritical fashion.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: arrests, dallas, free speech, law enforcement, police, shootings, social media
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I hate the BLM and most Police. The police have long fomented unrest in the Citizens by abusing their authority with little to zero backlash from what is largely and approving court and political power structure.
For all of Obama's bluster, he has does pretty much nothing for his people to stop this. Like every other problem, he runs his mouth, the only time he does take action is when liberty is being removed, or he can mass import America haters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It should never have come to this
There are no good cops until and unless they call out bad cops. Their responsibility to society, as public servants, must overrule their loyalty to their fellow officers.
Until that happens, and happens on a large scale, this is only going to get worse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It should never have come to this
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It should never have come to this
I don't, myself, know a lot of cops, so I won't attempt to confirm or dispute your perception.
But for the sake of argument, let's suppose your perception does reflect reality. Doesn't that imply that these abuses are institutionalized behavior? Doesn't power in a police department flow top-down?
Shouldn't we hold those with relatively more power to change things within that hierarchy more responsible than the foot-soldiers who merely execute policies crafted by their superiors (and, presumably, will be punished for failing to do so)?
I'm not saying give the grunts, the good Germans, a pass. Far from it.
But at the same time, let's not ignore those who wield more power: The more generalised a particular behavior is, among a top-down institution's members, the more that institution's authorities are responsible for it.
An article by one Ken Lawrence was published in 1985 (the text of which can be found online here, at archive.org), called The New State Repression.
It contains discussion of a text, apparently prepared for a course administered circa 1974 by Louis Giuffrida's CSTI (California Specialized Training Institute), titled "Civilian Violence and Terrorism: Officer Survival and Internal Security".
Lawrence's article contains ostensible quotes from the CSTI text that are relevant here. Here is one such excerpt:
Regarding that "necessary respect and reverence":
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It should never have come to this
After all, they're certainly there when a cop does something good/honest/useful/heroic. There's never a shortage of cops to hail this sort of thing, nor should there be.
But the cops who will stand and applaud when a fellow officer gets an award for valor should be the same people who -- just as loudly -- condemn when a cop shoots an unarmed civilian, running away, in the back.
Now -- as an exercise for the reader -- try to find a Baltimore cop who will criticize the six officers who killed Freddie Gray. We can argue all day about whether or not charges should have been brought (and which ones) and whether or not prosecution has been handled well and all that: but in the end, a healthy guy got turned into a dead guy after an encounter with six officers. Yet there hasn't even been a mild criticism of their actions from their fellow cops. Nothing. Instead every effort has been made to blame the victim for his own death -- quite convenient, since he isn't around to dispute that with his side of the story.
This story is repeated in Ferguson and Baton Rouge, New York City and Minneapolis, Los Angeles and Charleston. Police will not call out their own. They stonewall, they conceal, they obfuscate, they deflect, they exaggerate, and yes, they lie -- rather than do the right thing for the people they're supposed to protect and serve.
The only difference today is that we often get compelling video evidence that they're doing it. It's not new. They were doing all this stuff last year and in 2006 and 1986 and 1966 and...
And now the people have had enough. Which is why things like this happen and sadly, tragically, will continue to happen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Unmentioned serious problem
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Unmentioned serious problem
The police have shown nothing but apathy for the abused.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Unmentioned serious problem
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Unmentioned serious problem
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Unmentioned serious problem
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Unmentioned serious problem
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Unmentioned serious problem
Heck, find your address, create a fake female profile for you, and "dox" you to the GamerGate crowd. I mean, why harass someone yourself, when you can get patsies to do it for you?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'd say they need to be paranoid-cautious. When you have the power to destroy lives (literally with their guns) no amount of caution while wielding such power is too much.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Enticing such arrests happened first in Germany
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Misallocation Of Resources
It's amazing how motivated the police can be when things align with their interests.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good news for a change
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So, so very Poe.
If it's satire, good show!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So, so very Poe.
Troll has always gotta troll.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Power deployed in a hypocritical fashion. "
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The more that Law Enforcement cracks down on civilians being angry...
The more popcorn will pop.
Our law enforcement agent really really need more de-escalation training. C'mon guys you are hired specifically to be reasonable and rational in the face of chaos. If you can't do that, you need to not be an officer.
And if entire precincts and agencies can't do that they need to be disbanded in favor of agencies who can.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now, cops are being targeted. It's not just ramblings on social media but I've also seen gamers celebrating the shootings of police officers in MMO games like Star Trek Online.
Police officers are now becoming the target of citizens, and if you ask me, I absolutely believe that anyone who posts a threat online should be arrested because there is no reason for someone to post threats online.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Them's fightin' words.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Any cop who fails to denounce (or worse, actively defends) abusive cops are betraying their public duty and allying with the "small group" even if their conduct is otherwise unassailable.
This is why I think it's deceptive to say it's just a "small group" of bad cops. It appears to be the majority -- the difference is only in degree.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
None of the men have been charged.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Police officers have the right not to denounce such actions because those officers that do can receive abuse at the hands of their fellow officers. I'd rather have those good cops discharging their duty as police officers and not have them following in the footsteps of those bad cops.
MORON.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If they aid, abet and cover for bad cops being bad cops, they're not "good cops". I'd rather have genuine good cops. Period.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
-----
To sum up... thank goodness for the advent of AI to the Netizone!... wherewith, the parsing of dialogue through Expert Systems, coupled with properly trained Cyber Analysts and Policing Authorities, will make "definitive judgement calls" on the Comments being offered up on the Net, less "problematic"! Guessing at the nature of netizens' communications, is not helping keep the Net secure!... and it's not making the role of Policing any easier!... nor publicly acceptable!
-----
Please!... no emails!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If our choice really is between abusive cops and no cops, then we're just screwed. Fortunately, there does exist (in theory, anyway) a middle ground -- cops who are ethical, professional, and don't tolerate the abuse of police powers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Police forces go on strike...
And if they're too violent or too slow, well, the militia would mobilize pretty quickly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Imagine the police kicking the bad cops out. I bet that idea really blows your mind, huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Another proof media whores never question sources.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]