UK Gov't Report: Facebook, Twitter, And Google Are Pretty Much Unrepentant Terrorist Supporters
from the a-raging-hate-on,-disguised-as-an-official-report dept
The internet is for porn terrorism.
That's according to a report by the UK's Home Ministry, which claims the medium is inseparable from the message, especially if it's a US tech company.
Facebook, Twitter and Google and are deliberately failing to stop terrorists from using their websites to promote terrorism because they believe it will "damage their brands", MPs have warned.
MPs warned that social media websites are becoming the "vehicle of choice" for spreading terrorist propaganda but websites are policing billions of accounts and messages with just a "few hundred" employees.
I'm pretty sure giving terrorists free rein is more "damaging" to "brands" than the current status quo. Sure, chasing terrorists off the internet is just another form of whack-a-mole, but it's not as though these companies aren't trying. Facebook's policing of content tends to lean towards overzealous. Twitter just removed over 200,000 terrorist-related accounts. And as for Google, it's busy bending over backward for everyone, from copyright holders to a few dozen misguided governments. But the internet -- including terrorists -- perceives censorship as damage and quickly routes around it.
The argument can be made (and it's a pretty good argument) that it might be more useful to have terrorists chatting on open platforms where they can easily be monitored, rather than pushing them towards "darker" communications methods. But it's tough to reason with lawmakers who find big corporations to be the easiest targets for their displeasure.
And, really, their complaints are nothing more than a cheap form of class warfare, one that tacitly asks millions of non-terrorist internet users to sympathize with a government seeking to gain more control over the platforms they use.
Keith Vaz, the chairman of the committee, said: "Huge corporations like Google, Facebook and Twitter, with their billion-dollar incomes, are consciously failing to tackle this threat and passing the buck by hiding behind their supranational legal status, despite knowing that their sites are being used by the instigators of terror."
That's what the MPs are really seeking: a way to carve off a slice of these billion-dollar incomes. Vaz fears the "Wild West" internet (one filled with Middle Eastern desperadoes, apparently…) because it's "ungoverned" and "unregulated." If both of those "problems" are fixed, he'll presumably be able to sleep better -- perhaps warmed by the flow of a new revenue stream or soothed by an expansion of his government's powers. Either way, these companies should have to shoulder the blame for terrorism's continued existence.
Some might make the argument that the government isn't doing enough to fight terrorism. After all, "billions" of dollars go towards this battle every year, and every year nothing appears to change.
The report points specifically to the supposedly "low" number of employees policing posted content.
"It is alarming that these companies have teams of only a few hundred employees to monitor networks of billions of accounts..."
Apparently, these billion-dollar companies are expected to move towards a 1:1 ratio of moderators to users. Vaz also claims these companies need to take a "no questions asked" attitude towards law enforcement demands to have content taken down. If so, perhaps the UK government should start hiring more law enforcement officers and move the needle more towards a 1:1 ratio of constables to internetizens… or at least a 1:1 ratio of constables to platform content moderators.
The report also points to various "failures" within the UK government, suggesting anti-terrorism laws just aren't quite strict enough. It notes that police have allowed alleged terrorists to leave the country while on bail because they haven't seized their passports. And an official from Scotland Yard asserts -- with wording that suggests the UK doesn't have quite enough restraints on speech yet -- that existing laws can't shut down the sort of thing the report complains that Google, Facebook, and Twitter aren't shutting down quickly enough: namely, posts by Anjem Choudary, a "hate preacher" who was convicted of supporting the Islamic State.
Richard Walton, the former head of Scotland Yard's counter terrorism command, today warns that existing British laws would not prevent preachers who followed Choudary's example and acting as "radicalisers".
Obviously, the answer is MORE LAWS. That should fix it. That and blaming tech companies for third-party content, something they already police about as well as they can, considering the number of users on their respective platforms. It's always handy to have a scapegoat to beat like the dead horse these arguments are, especially when the scapegoat can mixed-metaphorically be portrayed as fat cats electro-fiddling while social media burns.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: free speech, internet, isis, keith vaz, moderation, open internet, platforms, terrorism, uk
Companies: facebook, google, twitter
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Source, please
Because MP's know ALL that cool stuff! What's hip-hop 'n' happenin' amongst the bearded elite of the world's terror communities. Not only are they not pathetically isolated from their own constituents, they know all the social media foibles of evildoers everywhere.
Either that, or they read it in the tabloids.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Solution and Reality
1) Yes
2) No
3) I don't know
Each of the responses has a different reaction. If yes is checked, the computer automatically turns on camera, microphone, gps and sends a copy of the information, a list of installed programs, passwords in clear text to the World Wide Consortium of Terrorist Watchers (and are searching for a cooler acronym). When received the monitoring personnel have three choices:
A) Add the information to haystack as needle.
B) Add the information to haystack as hay.
C) Add the information to haystack as anomalous.
Then they go for coffee.
A second group, know for their unique investigative skills, use the information collected to find camera feeds that titillate their personal fantasies and watch for hours. When sufficiently stimulated, they go for coffee.
When new terrorist attacks take place, everyone points to an encryption protocol that has not been used since the Napoleonic wars, and go for coffee.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
By their standards, succeeding at stopping terrorism would require the electronic equivalent of randomly firing hellfire missiles into downtown London -- no actual target, just random direction, trajectory and velocity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I am so fukin tired of hearing about that. If anything... the NSA and it's cohorts are the ones acting like it's a free-for-all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is the vantablack pot calling the kettle black.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
This is going off on a tangent, but did TD ever cover the absurdity of only one artist in the UK being allowed to use vantablack?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A 1:1 ratio of moderators to 'citizens'
Or like Orwell's 1984. How many people are there actually monitoring all the Telescreens*?
* Telescreen: aka "smart TV" with built in web cam and mic that runs encrypted, signed binary blob firmware.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Consequently, an international arrest warrant has been issued for Marshall McLuhan.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
fear mongering much MPs?
A government can claim they will not abuse the power but we have already seen that argument fail a lot when it comes to technology and rights of citizens.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Terrorism...
Government has visited and justified all manner of tyranny upon their people under the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
Every Nation gets the government it deserves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
History Repeats ... AGAIN!
[message in 2003: anyone downloading MP3s from Napster or KaZaA is supporting terrorism!]
http://www.infoworld.com/article/2680602/networking/file-trading-may-fund-terrorism.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: History Repeats ... AGAIN!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: History Repeats ... AGAIN!
Both the republicans and democrats are trying to destroy America along with the worthless "citizens" that keep voting these bastards in.
Of course history will be repeated, we are BEGGING FOR IT!
Every Nation gets the Government it deserves!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They are not...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Unfortunately Vaz is a home-grown local idiot, always has been. he's one of those people you don't want to get between him and a camera/microphone.
Early Methodists were considered a danger and a threat to society too. Just thought I'd mention that random fact.
As for allowing suspected terrists to leave by not seizing their passports, I rather suspect that's a secret policy many would like. Let them go, but not back in. UK gov now has the power to revoke citizenship while the person is overseas, I believe.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Legislature not Executive
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pedantry
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_Affairs_Select_Committee
Keith Vaz, the committee's chair, is a notorious self-publicist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The only reason people have died as a result of dank memes about Muhammad is because his irrational, psychotic cult followers went batsh*t all over the people who made them. A joke by itself kills no one. The problem is with the people who can't take it -- and their censorious, do-gooder enablers pretending to be playground monitors by giving the "bullies" detention.
When actually, what they're really doing is punishing the bully's victims who laugh at him and call him out for the troglodyte he is. But the playground monitor fears that the bully will escalate his bullying to the point of another Columbine, so rather than deal with the bully, the playground monitor lets him have free rein over the whole playground by ordering his victims not to "provoke" him.
In a sane world, the whole lot of them, and their sick, primitive, pedophile mass-murder cult, would be banned from sharing the same playground as us civilized folks who play nicely and don't mind harmless insults. But no, we're the bad guys for "punching down," a la South Park and Charlie Hebdo. Ahmed Qaboom is the real victim because those mean old colonialist bullies kept humiliating him by "whitesplaining" his special imaginary friend.
Zuckerberg, Dorsey and Schmidt are as culpable in aiding and abetting Islamic terrorism as everyone in D.C. and the feckless Eurocrats who allow this pathology to fester in the name of kumbaya "multiculturalism." Face it: Islam is trash as are its believers, and either they get on board with the 21st century and free expression or go home, because none of them are worthy of the slightest iota of respect.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Someone, somewhere, in a government owned building, is currently sticking their fingers in their ears while chanting
'La, la-la, la-la'
Actions have consequences, even at the level of what we call a government........to make an action, ignore the consequence, ignore, lie, and make even BIGGER the problems, by 'dealing' with the problem that WAS'NT there BEFORE the action you took YESTERDAY
I say yesterday, because were not allowed to remember back further, so it seems
[ link to this | view in chronology ]