Intel Community To Institute Actual Whistleblower Award For 'Speaking Truth To Power'
from the previous-whistleblowers-need-not-apply dept
The Intelligence Community is looking to reward whistleblowers for "speaking truth to power." No, seriously. Steven Aftergood of Secrecy News has posted a recent Intel Community announcement [PDF] that looks to fold a whistleblower honor into the community's existing awards program.
This is part of the intel community's cautious foray into the harsh sunlight of transparency -- itself a response to a presidential directive that our nation's spies head outside for a bit and expose themselves a bit.
The award may as well be called the "Snowden." But the wording makes it explicit Snowden himself will never be eligible to receive the honorific fruits of his whistleblowing.
“The intelligence community has […] committed to establishing a National Intelligence Professional Awards program to recognize superior service by an intelligence professional in effectuating change by speaking truth to power, by exemplifying professional integrity, or by reporting wrongdoing through appropriate channels,” according to a new Self-Assessment Report on the Third Open Government National Action Plan that was released by the White House last week.
It could be argued Snowden's leaks "spoke truth to power," but it's going to be a bit hard to get past the "through appropriate channels" clause, which seems to be the last refuge of anti-Snowden scoundrels: "Yes, his leaks lead to much-needed changes, but he should have used the proper channels where he would have been ignored/retaliated against!" Then again, the award stipulations has an "or" before "reporting wrongdoing through appropriate channels," so being told to shut up and mind your own business by Congressional intelligence committees may not be required to land this new award.
It will be interesting to see how receptive the intelligence committee actually is to whistleblowing. This award may end up being handed out to whistleblowers whose complaints result in the least amount of internal turmoil. Aftergood notes surveillance agencies haven't historically been receptive to constructive criticism… or any criticism, really.
Professional integrity may be welcome everywhere, but “speaking truth to power” is rarely welcomed by “power.” Often it is not even acknowledged as “truth.” (Apparently, the IC envisions itself here as the domain of truth, and not of power. Or will those who challenge the IC leadership itself be eligible for the new award?) Meanwhile, “reporting wrongdoing” often seems to end badly for the reporter, as the frequency of whistleblower reprisal claims indicates.
If the IC moves forward with this award in an honest fashion, it will be a refreshing change from the longtime policy of "bullets for messengers" that has been implemented with particular fervor by this administration. Aftergood believes there may be reason to believe this may not just be the Intelligence Committee looking busy for the boss. Presidential directives come and go but honorifics last forever. Nothing like this would be instituted if it didn't actually reflect values the IC wants to promote.
Whether or not the IC intends to celebrate its own internal critics, it seems to want to encourage and now incentivize them, providing improved channels for dissent and whistleblowing that will not inevitably be career-enders or needlessly disruptive in other ways.
I guess we'll see where this goes. It would be nice if the New Transparency resulted in a livestream of a James Clapper-hosted awards show, broadcast from an undisclosed location in a room draped in American flags and the low hum of server farms. Failing that, a mostly-unredacted document dump on a Friday afternoon preceding a holiday weekend would be an adequate substitute, I suppose.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: intelligence community, leaks, truth to power, whistleblowers
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's a good thing they included the "or" - these are mutually exclusive.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Derp.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
author?
If I can get a little pedantic for a second, can I request that we refrain from, or at least standardize, the capitalization of "Intelligence Community"? Both it and "IC" is used in a few places in this article, but in others it's just "intelligence community", and there's also a reference to "intelligence committee[s]" which probably ought to be capitalized because that is definitely referring to a proper name.
I don't mean to be all "oh that's confusing" or anything, I just think mixing terminology like that makes it less clear. And despite my frequent use of the internet, irregular capitalization still irks me a little, I admit.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
NIPA?
Is the reward a complete violation of basic human rights?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
They can't handle the truth, those truth-mishandlers. They wouldn't know it if it came up and bit them in the ass.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's BS
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bait?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Proposed name for this new award
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Bait?
1. What is your name?
2. Which part of the government do you work for?
3. Please explain what you are reporting and why you would want to embarrass the government this with this?
4. What is your least favorite form of enhanced interrogation?
Don't forget to click SUBMIT
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
They know EXACTLY what truth looks like because they are diligently alert in case truth were to rear its ugly head.
What you call mishandling they call damage control. Political expedience. A matter of internal security.
Then there are fallbacks if it is actually exposed: but it's perfectly legal, I was only doing my job, I'm shocked, shocked! Etc.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wait, what?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Until..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bill_of_Rights
"intelligence professional in effectuating change by speaking truth to power, by exemplifying professional integrity, or by reporting wrongdoing through appropriate channels"
These 2 things MEAN NOTHING..
Intelligence professional
Professional Integrity
Appropriate Channels..
A Int pro, does NOT tell anyone anything..There are NO channels.. as the only person that KNOWS what you are doing is your Boss, and those OUTSIDE the circle, are ignorant of anything ..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Whistleblower Bullet Fee Reduction Act
Whistleblower's families will be allowed to deduct the 'bullet fees' from their regular income taxes, but they will be 'preference items' for alternate minimum tax (AMT) purposes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullet_fee
A bullet fee is a charge/fee levied to the family of executed prisoners.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Which Master?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Leave it to the professionals
"IT'S A TRAP!"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Whistleblower Award
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Proposed name for this new award
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Wait, what?
The media remains the only option if you are serious.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Intel Community reaches out to VW for advice
The Intel Community has contacted Volkswagen in order to better understand the subtleties and complexities of implementing an effective whistleblower program.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Wait, what?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Wait, what?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Yeah, I believe it
Next thing I know, my commander sent out a squadron wide email stating that a military member approaching congress is a supported channel and within the member's constitutionally protected rights.
I can only assume that someone in my unit approached my commander and asked that I be sanctioned.
Yeah, I believe them. There are too many things going on right now that prove that these people have no respect for their oaths and zero integrity to take anything they say seriously.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Wait, what?
Why, they even threw together a joke of a 'court' to rubber-stamp any request put before it, really what more do you want?
*If by 'proper channels' you mean the ones they created and ran.
[ link to this | view in thread ]