FBI's Comey: Actually, Chasing ISIS Off Twitter Makes It More Difficult For Us To Follow Them

from the things-to-think-about dept

Tue, Oct 4th 2016 8:31am — Mike Masnick

Over and over again we keep hearing politicians and others going on and on about the need for social media companies like Facebook, Twitter and Google to kick ISIS users off their platforms. Both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump have called for this. And some people at these companies are supportive of this idea. Twitter regularly feels compelled to talk about how many ISIS accounts it removes.

Yet, as we've pointed out each time it's done so, this seems backwards. We've noted that intelligence officials have claimed that they actually get really good intelligence from following these social media accounts. But generally those voices aren't heard as much. So it's actually great to see FBI Direct James Comey (someone we rarely agree with) come out and say it directly: kicking ISIS members off Twitter makes things more difficult for law enforcement.

"We are making good progress with the help of companies like Twitter at chasing the Islamic State" off the platform—the microblogging site has suspended hundreds of thousands of accounts promoting terrorism—but Comey said the challenge is that such efforts push some users "to a place where they’re less able to proselytize broadly but more able to communicate in a secure way. [We've] chased them to apps like Telegram.”

Now, of course, this all seems part of Comey's effort to then demonize encryption. But there is a larger point here: when terrorists are using social media and revealing useful info, why should we try to kick them off those platforms? Let them make mistakes.

I know that the big fear from some is that letting ISIS use Twitter means they can better "recruit" but almost every study on this notes that online recruitment isn't really that effective. Most recruitment happens from people who actually know people. And cutting ISIS people off from Twitter also kills off good opportunities for counterspeech, like the time that an ISIS leader called on Muslims to join ISIS, and a whole bunch of Muslims responded with mocking tweets instead:

Yes, yes, I know that people saying stuff we disagree with online is very scary -- but silencing them has serious costs as well. So, yes, here's a rare instance where we agree with James Comey: pushing ISIS members off of Twitter is a bad idea. It harms the ability of law enforcement to follow them (and, gives Comey more opportunities to whine about encryption). Just keep them on Twitter and let law enforcement and the intelligence community follow them.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: censorship, encryption, fbi, isis, james comey, law enforcement, social media, surveillance
Companies: twitter

21 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

I.T. Guy, 4 Oct 2016 @ 8:52am

I love the internet.
"Only if there is free pizza."
"My dad said I have to be home by 8. Will we be done by then?"
LOL.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Ninja (profile), 4 Oct 2016 @ 10:02am
  
  Re:
  My thoughts. That's how we should treat these lunatics. With mockery.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 4 Oct 2016 @ 10:08am
  
  Re:
  Interestingly, the first pizza I thought of was Pepperoni. The second was Ham & Pineapple.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Wendy Cockcroft (profile), 5 Oct 2016 @ 7:26am
    
    Re: Re:
    Ha ha! bit I.T. Guy and Ninja are correct; mockery is the best response to this kind of thing. And damn, it is funny!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Wendy Cockcroft (profile), 5 Oct 2016 @ 7:27am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      *I.T. Guy and Ninja are correct...
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 4 Oct 2016 @ 8:55am

Really?
I am having a difficult time accepting that Comey said something intelligent, given the rest of the crap he spews.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 4 Oct 2016 @ 9:12am
  
  Re: Really?
  I guess this is so blatantly obvious, even he can find it apparent?
  On the other hand, if they kick the terrorists off their platforms, what excuse would the FBI/NSA/etc. have to snoop around them? So it could just be self-serving.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- DannyB (profile), 4 Oct 2016 @ 9:58am
  
  Re: Really?
  Dear Mr. Comey,
  
  When you "follow" ISIS on FaceTwit, you should probably not use a FaceTwit account that says something like "FBI", "CIA", etc. And be aware that this increases the count of followers.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 4 Oct 2016 @ 12:06pm
    
    Re: Re: Really?
    that will just drive informants to use nicknames that say "not fbi" or "not cia"
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 4 Oct 2016 @ 2:31pm
  
  Re: Really?
  Underestimating Comey's intelligence is a pretty grave mistake. Differentiate between disagreeing with his methods and his justifications, and his intelligence.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 4 Oct 2016 @ 11:16am

Advice from two centuries ago
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." -- Napoleon
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Aaron Walkhouse (profile), 4 Oct 2016 @ 12:00pm

Here's a simple idea:
Instead of kicking them off completely confine them to their
own echo chamber so they [and the TLAs] can only see each other.

The few smart ones will notice they are no longer visible
to the public but the rest will blissfully go on, giving
valuable information to law enforcement for several years.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
tom (profile), 4 Oct 2016 @ 12:25pm

Years ago, politicians strong armed ISPs to shutdown their USENET newsgroup servers since several of the newsgroups catered to the child porn crowd. Once most of the ISPs complied, law enforcement then announced they were having a much harder time tracking child porn distributors since they moved to a more point to point login account required system.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dont believe Comey, 4 Oct 2016 @ 2:09pm

Comey Lies
Comey is laughable.

Comey wants Isis on twitter because it is very likely a lot of the ISIS twitter chat is being conducted by FBI and CIA plants. Without ISIS, how can the "war on terror" and the over bloated inteligence budgets be justified?

Don't believe a damn thing that comes out of Comey's mouth. Comey has shown his true colors and he is an American traitor.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 4 Oct 2016 @ 4:44pm

I thought the same thing when I read that Twitter was ratcheting up their account closures. It's been pretty incredible to have access to their communications in such a wide open way. Unfortunately you never beat an adversary when you just plug your ears and eyes to the messages they're sending
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Whatever, 4 Oct 2016 @ 5:42pm

James is so dreamy, I want him to "comey" all over my face. Or inside me, I'm really not picky.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
John Mayor, 4 Oct 2016 @ 10:42pm

THE FBI VS THE UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE
But Mike!... this is the same practice that got the FBI in trouble, re Playpen! In fact!... the FBI started acting as if they were the "bad guys", in order to-- supposedly!-- "sucker-in" the "real bad guys"!
.
Mike!... to paraphrase the late author Aldous Huxley:... "The ends don't justify our use of just any means... for the means we use, will determine the very nature of the ends produced!" And simply stated!... we can't be aiding crime, in order to prevent it!... to do so, is to become the criminal!
.
There are numerous ways to "tag" the "bad guys", without having to "become the bad guys", or facilitate what the "bad guys" are doing! And if the FBI can't figure out how to secure the clues they need without having to compromise a "conscionable ethos", then it's time to give the task of "clue management" to another "Security stakeholder"!
.
Please!... no emails!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Whatever, 5 Oct 2016 @ 12:24am
  
  Re: THE FBI VS THE UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE
  I know! I just love it when the FBI is being bad to be good. It's so naughty!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gunnar, 4 Oct 2016 @ 11:50pm

Different el-Baghdadi
This is completely mistaken. Iyad el-Baghdadi is not the ISIS leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, he is a human rights activist living in exile in Norway, citing ISIS-leaders, but certainly not agreeing.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-35210527
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Whatever (profile), 5 Oct 2016 @ 8:15am

Actually, I am thinking that if ISIS is harder to follow by the FBI or Homeland or whoever, then they must generally be harder to follow by the general public as well.

Anything that helps keep young people from radicalizing and joining the (insanely stupid) cause is perhaps not such a bad thing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 5 Oct 2016 @ 5:56pm
  
  Re:
  Finally decided to log back in? You sick fuck.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]