Thai Government Demands Popular Chat App Reveal Any Time Any User Insults The King
from the encrypted-chats-are-important dept
I spent some time in Asia earlier this year, and while people in the US focus on Facebook Messenger, Snapchat, Google Hangouts and a variety of other chat apps, the chat app of choice over there was Line. Basically everyone used it. A year ago, Line moved towards true end-to-end encryption. Earlier this year, the company made end-to-end encrypted chats the default, rather than as a user option (Thank you Snowden!).Good timing. The company has apparently now refused to obey a Thai government demand that it alert the government to anyone insulting the Thai royal family on the messaging app. For years, we've written about Thailand's ridiculous lese majeste laws, which make it a crime to insult the king. As we've noted, the law is used as a way to censor and crack down on political opponents. And, of course, with the death of the Thai king last month, there's been a sudden uptick in Thai officials going after people for supposed lese majeste violations.
But Line is telling the government that it just can't help out here.
"We do not monitor or block user content. User content is also encrypted, and cannot be viewed by LINE," the statement sent to DPA said.Of course, there's been some controversy in the past over this. Back in 2014, Thailand announced that it was instituting a broad surveillance program to snoop on basically all internet communications for the sake of seeking out and punishing lese majeste violators. A few months later, Thai government officials flat out claimed that this included monitoring Line messages, something that the company flat out denied (though, that may have also inspired the move to encryption). While Thai officials have, at times, even claimed the ability to read encrypted messages, it seemed like that was just idle boasting, rather than a legitimate revelation of surveillance capabilities.
There is one oddity about Line's response to the Thai government, though:
"We ask the authorities seeking to obtain user data to make official requests through diplomatic channels and have so advised the Thai authorities," LINE added.So, uh, if the messages are all end-to-end encrypted and there's no way for Line to access them to share with any government, why is it asking the Thai government to use diplomatic channels to make an official request?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: chat, encryption, insults, king, lese majeste, messaging, thailand
Companies: line
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Now, instead of every single police office, government agency, etc all making requests and threats when they don't get fulfilled, just one single agency acts as gatekeeper for requests and threats.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Spy harder...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trump's role model
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Trump's role model
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Trump's role model
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Trump's role model
There IS a difference between wanting to vote in a criminal, and NOT wanting a geopolitical time bomb of self destructive smug arrogance in office.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Trump's role model
A geopolitical time bomb of self destructive smug arrogance who is also a criminal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Trump's role model
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Trump's role model
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Trump's role model
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Trump's role model
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well-aimed spite? Knowing they did all that paperwork when you write out a guaranteed 'no' would be hilarious.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I rather like it, outside of the cutesy stuff my younger kids love.
The file sharing, gif making on PC (just slap a border down and hit record) and getting my messages on PC and phone at the same time make it quite handy, the encryption is a nice touch. Video phone has worked well too.
Easy enough that my elderly mother even figured it out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
But I finally removed it because it was the heaviest, most bloated app on my phone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Easy. To get help from their home country, and to show that they aren't a Thai company.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The ultimate irony
The punchline to the whole joke of course is that the law against 'insulting' the king is more insulting than anything it might stop, as it makes it clear that mere words are enough to grievously insult the loser on the throne(or at this point the corpse of said loser apparently).
The law itself is a greater insult to the 'dignity' and 'majesty' of the royal family by implying that they're such thin-skinned buffoons that despite being in such powerful positions they are so immature that they just can't handle mean words.
(Before someone else points it out, yes I'm aware that it's being used to crack down on dissent, that being it's actual function, my comment is based upon the lie of what it's claimed to be for.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The ultimate irony
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The ultimate irony
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Insulting the President
So given I am German and that this is writing if I were to say, in theory, and these following words are just an example of what not to say: The President of Germany is a....
Honestly, I am afraid to say what I think of him because I really don't want to end up in jail because the honored Judge Wilhelm Gerhard recently said,paraphrased, that people are not subject to be protected from harm by the German Gov when in prison and are kind of supposed to be raped.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Insulting the President
No worries, my above comment can be applied to any person in a position of power/authority who makes it illegal to insult them, meaning their own actions are the greatest insult that can be delivered to such 'delicate' children pretending to be adults.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Insulting the President
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fight me IRL, Thairants.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Perhaps because asking for data about an account (eg. names, telephone numbers, contact lists, etc.) can be answered even though messages cannot be read.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Royal Family Reunions
/s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_(application)#Censorship
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A great idea -- why didn't *my* nerds think of that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]