Magical Cop Detects Drugs Better Than Blood Tests; Continues To Lock Innocent People Up
from the let's-just-shut-down-the-crime-lab-and-save-taxpayers-some-$$$ dept
In court filings, testimony, and warrant affidavits, law enforcement officers refer constantly to their "training and expertise." Given enough time on the job and enough laser-printed certificates, any law enforcement officer can be an "expert" in anything… even detecting nonexistent drug impairment.
Atlanta's 11 Alive News has been digging into Officer T.T. Carroll's impressive run of Driving Under the Influence arrests and finding some that aren't all that impressive. [h/t PitchforksAtTheGate] T.T. Carroll is a certified "Drug Recognition Expert," having attended 160 hours of classes put on by the International Association of Chiefs of Police. Carroll is referred to by his coworkers as the "go-to guy" for impairment arrests and was given an award by the Mothers Against Drunk Driving for racking up 90 DUI arrests in one year.
Whatever the IACP is teaching in its classes must be powerful stuff. Officer Carroll's observational powers allow him to detect people impaired by drugs they've never had in their system.
Officer Carroll: "I'm going to ask you a question, okay? When was the last time you smoked marijuana?"
Katelyn Ebner: "Oh, I don't do that. I can give you a drug test right now."
Officer Carroll: "You don't smoke marijuana?"
Katelyn Ebner: "I do not, no."
Officer Carroll: "Okay. Well, you're showing me indicators that you have been smoking marijuana, okay?"
Katelyn Ebner: "I'm going to jail for marijuana?"
Officer Carroll: "No, ma'am -- not possession, unless I find any in your car. I believe you're impaired by the marijuana you've smoked."
Katelyn Ebner: "Okay, so when I do a drug test, I'll be free to go, correct?"
Officer Carroll: "You're going to jail, ma'am. Okay? I don't have a magical drug test that I can give you right now."
Ah, but Officer Carroll does have a "magical drug test." It's one he performs during stops that provides him with the probable cause for arrest, even when roadside impairment tests disagree with his PC assessment. And if his amazing drug recognition skills fail him, it's the arrestees that pay the price. In the case of Ebner, whose blood test came back clean, it cost her her job. Ebner worked for a bar but her license to serve alcohol was revoked because of the impairment arrest. Four months after her bogus arrest, she was cleared of all charges. All well and good, but being cleared of charges doesn't undo the damage done during the four months when charges were still pending.
The 11 Alive report examines two more arrests involving Officer Carroll's superhuman ability to detect drugs blood tests can't even find. In all three cases, lab tests for substances came up clean. Rather than offer to take a look at the super-productive officer's body of work, the police department has doubled down on its assertion that Officer Carroll detects drugs better than a blood test.
Complaints filed by arrestees have gone nowhere. The Cobb County PD's internal investigators responded with one highly-dubious claim…
Cobb County Investigators exonerated the officer and doubted Ebner's innocence, insisting, 'the marijuana could have already metabolized out of the blood.'
And one highly-infuriating one:
"When you brought up that you had a clean blood test when complaining to Internal Affairs, their answer was what?" Keefe asked.
"They said, 'Yeah, we see this happen all the time. Um, the test results come back wrong all the time,'" she said.
These would be the same drug tests prosecution experts would claim to be infallible if needed to secure a conviction. This lab apparently only hands out false negatives.
The consequences of Officer Carroll's "drug whispering" will never be felt by Officer Carroll. His department is already shielding him from the press and if these complaints become civil rights lawsuits, it's highly likely Carroll's "expertise" will result in a granting of qualified immunity. A little knowledge can be a dangerous thing, but no more so than in the hands of someone with a great deal of power and very little accountability.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: blood tests, drugs, police, tt carroll
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Consequences
Officer T.T. Carroll is a known serial liar.
The Cobb County police department supports and encourages serial liars.
Cobb County police department arrest records are not credible.
These points should be raised in ANY trial where Cobb County police testimony is presented, or any background check using police records.
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
If you last used Marijuana weeks or even months ago, it can still be detected in your system in some drug tests, even if you're no longer under it's influence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is there any recourse?
Let's pretend the arrestee had unlimited money and resources and wanted to put an end to this bullshit. What could be done?
Sometimes I have to stop visiting this site because ignorance is bliss and this shit scares the hell outta me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Is there any recourse?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Is there any recourse?
In which case the police department would become very rich, as it would be seized as being the proceeds of drug crimes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Is there any recourse?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Is there any recourse?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't worry Sessions will fix this
Don't worry Sessions will fix this.
Civil rights groups alarmed at Justice Department's review of local police settlements
Sessions tells DOJ to revisit Obama-era agreements with local police departments
Don’t Let Jeff Sessions Undermine Police Reform
AG Sessions Orders Review of DOJ Police Conduct Investigations — Restore, Respect Local Control
Jeff Sessions ties increase in violent crime to ‘undermined’ respect for police
This one I'll comment on by asking: who exactly has undermined the respect for police? Perhaps an investigation should be started into that.
AG Sessions’ Strong Support of Local Police Misses Key Point
I could post more, but why.
We need more law and order! (especially by the people who are supposed to give us law and order!)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Consequences
Officer T.T. Carroll is a known serial liar.
The Cobb County police department supports and encourages serial liars.
Cobb County police department arrest records are not credible.
These points should be raised in ANY trial where Cobb County police testimony is presented, or any background check using police records.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Consequences
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Consequences
When the court questions the reliability of your witness, challenge the reliability of their police testimony. When they bring evidence of good character, bring out Carroll and every single other officer who's lied about drug tests in Cobb Country, noting any contradictions between their statements and that of prosecutors.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Obviously...
Officer T. T. Carroll is a witch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Obviously...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Can we dunk him anyway, just to be sure?
Well, he's obviously channeling one of those detection dogs that always signals and ensures probable cause. But without the dog.
Otherkin?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Obviously...
(I got better)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
'The evidence disagrees with the official claims, therefore the evidence is wrong.'
The consequences of Officer Carroll's "drug whispering" will never be felt by Officer Carroll. His department is already shielding him from the press and if these complaints become civil rights lawsuits, it's highly likely Carroll's "expertise" will result in a granting of qualified immunity.
Of course, because when all you care about is convictions the fact that a few/many/majority of those charged are innocent is irrelevant, as whether or not someone is guilty or not doesn't change the number of convictions. Challenging the miraculous ability to spot drugs might be wrong would lead to a decrease in convictions, and we can't have that now can we?
Add to that it's a cop making the accusations and ruining lives, and as any police union(and many departments, and judges, and DAs...) will tell you a cop is never wrong. If the tests came out negative after he's declared that the accused has used drugs then the test must be wrong(this time, any positives are of course completely and 100% accurate).
The level of denial on display would almost be impressive if it weren't so incredibly damaging to those impacted by it, as it is it's simply yet another perfect example of why people are increasingly losing any respect they might have had for the police.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Keeping the cash flowing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Get them on perjury.
Forget the prosecution and judge - we really need JURIES to stand up and be counted here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Get them on perjury.
Another thing is, is a 'Drug Recognition Expert' certified as someone who can tell the difference between crumbs from donut frosting vs cocaine, or someone who can not only tell that someone is on drugs, but what kind, (and maybe which regional pharma plant they came from as well as the year of production), just by looking at someone?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Undercover Fed is what's needed.
Then, when he's about to make his "arrest", boom, feds swarm in, slam him into the ground, slap the cuffs on him and take him away for a one way trip to Gitmo for life.
I figure if the "police officer" can't bother to follow the law, and makes false arrests as well as falsifying police reports, then he can just get sent somewhere to sit and rot for the rest of his life.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Undercover Fed is what's needed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Reminds me of something....
/snark
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What authority?
So, I visit Mom in Colorado, inhale some legal smoke and travel back home to a non-legal-inhale-smoke state and...
Oh yoo-hoo! Yo, prison-for-profit yahoos, your karma is coming to getcha. Somehow methinks you'all will be booted off the boat in due time.
What a country. What a bad-dream dizzy (Disney) loony bin this is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So, what is this Katelyn Ebner doing now that's she's lost her job?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So, what is this Katelyn Ebner doing now that's she's lost her job?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think someone similarly trained showing up in the police station saying they are all on drugs would lead to fun. They have to arrest themselves, or admit the system is bullshit.
I suppose the only upside is they can claim it isn't the often wrong $2 field tests screwing people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The smartest guy in the room
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
or just flood them with a bunch of little lawsuits?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Can the officer explain the indicators displayed and provide details about how she failed each of them, either in his report or under oath in a court of law? If not, how does this proceed any further? Or has the legal system become so degraded that evidence is no longer needed in a case of this magnitude?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cobb county Sheriff
Deputy: Didn't you just refuse to go out with my brother? You must be on drugs I'm certified.
Deputy: Aren't you the one that sold my nephew that broken Zune? You must be on drugs I'm certified.
Deputy: You didn't make a sizable donation to my kids collage fund? You must be on drugs, I'm certified.
Deputy: Did you just look me in the eye sinner? You must be on drugs, I'm certified.
Deputy: If I make 2 more bogus arrests the week, I will get a promotion and more money. You must be on drugs, I'm certified.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The proper response to any of his bullshit is
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In a fair world I mean
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
validated by a scientific panel or, failing that, the Randi foundation.
Good catch, if he's really a magic drug detector then a few hours, maybe a day max and he could easily score a million bucks and validation for his miraculous ability. Of course I imagine he'd pull a Geller and 'just not feel it' that day, or any other day of testing...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When?
Think about it. In all but the most technical senses, it really does. And even being exonerated does not change things. It's even worse in cases like CP or rape, where the stigma *never* goes away, no matter innocence or mistaken identity or what have you. Once arrested, always tainted.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: When?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Magic drug test
BTW Does anybody remembers the tv show "lie To Me" This training appears to be closely related to the subject of the tv show, becoming a human lie detector by watching the subject rather than listening. Questions are asked, answers are given & heard, but it's the subject's body language that they are using to determine truthfulness.
Problems arise when the environment around the officer and subject is ignored. Time of day, Lighting, traffic, weather, all can influence the behavior of both officer and subject.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]