DOJ To End Operation ChokePoint; Porn Stars Free To Bank Once More!
from the strange-times dept
You may recall that in 2014 we wrote about a strange occurrence having to do with Chase Bank refusing to provide its banking services to Teagan Presley, a rather well known adult film actress. When it became clear that Presley wasn't the only performer to whom this was happening, it initially looked as though banks were engaging in a form of slut-shaming of adult film actors. It turned out, however, that it was the federal government doing the slut-shaming, with the emergence of the Department of Justice's Operation Choke Point. This DOJ policy that was developed to combat financial fraud somehow bled over the stencil lines and became a sort of banking morality police, encouraging banks to cut off services to industries like adult film, fireworks retail stores, and sellers engaged in what the DOJ deemed to be "racist materials." It's worth highlighting that all of these industries and actions, whether you like them or not, are legal, yet the DOJ was essentially attempting to extra-judiciously scuttle them through secretive federal policy. That should have terrified everyone, but didn't, and so the program went on.
Until recently. The justice department recently announced that Operation Choke Point will be ended.
The move hands a big victory to Republican lawmakers who charged that the initiative — dubbed "Operation Choke Point" — was hurting legitimate businesses. In a letter to House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd referred to the program as "a misguided initiative."
“We share your view that law abiding businesses should not be targeted simply for operating in an industry that a particular administration might disfavor,” says the letter, obtained by progressive activist group Allied Progress and later provided to POLITICO by Goodlatte's office. “Enforcement decisions should always be made based on facts and the applicable law. We reiterate that the Department will not discourage the provision of financial services to lawful industries, including businesses engaged in short-term lending and firearms-related activities,” it adds. A nearly identical letter was sent to Sens. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Mike Crapo (R-Idaho).
We tend to stay away from partisan politics here at Techdirt, but I cannot write this post without pointing out the oddity that is an Obama-era policy preventing adult film stars from getting banking services and a GOP administration then restoring them. Obviously, per Boyd's letter, there are many more industries that were persecuted that are more in the realm of typical conservative fodder, but it seems that the DOJ is ending the operation in full and is doing so as a matter of principle. Good principle, it should be noted, because attempting to punish lawful businesses through banking back-deals is an especially scummy way to do government. Several applauding members of the government rightly point out that temporary presidential administrations ought not be able to choke out (their word, not mine) legal businesses at their whim and fancy.
Goodlatte and House Financial Services Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas), along with Reps. Tom Marino (R-Pa.), Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-Mo.) and Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) praised the department in a joint statement.
“We applaud the Trump Justice Department for decisively ending Operation Choke Point," they said. "The Obama Administration created this ill-advised program to suffocate legitimate businesses to which it was ideologically opposed by intimidating financial institutions into denying banking services to those businesses."
Now, some of these industries themselves are industries we may not want to applaud. Some of us have severe issues with payday loan companies, for instance, and some of us surely don't care for the adult film business. But if they're legal, and they are, this sort of thing is no way to deal with these industries.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: banking, businesses, doj, operation choke point, porn stars
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
... I have to ask, why specify Obama-era? What about Trump-era, Bush-era, Clinton-era, etc, etc? Shouldn't all overreaches be repealed?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This was going into The Maz's just prior pro-corporate piece, but fits here:
First, I remind that fascism is merged government and corporations, EXACTLY what's done this topic: DOJ and banks in a system outside the Constitution.
Can't you guys see that if solely corporations decide what's allowed, and thereby control users, it's inherently bad, will certainly lead to tyranny through and by those platforms? Do you think that present "platforms" are good, benign, totally free of gov't interference, follow your philosophy, and always will be? (Emphasis added in revision.)
Well, even if so... Imagine if Trump, that reckless insane scourge of all that's good and liberal, just simply "nationalized" the platforms? The President has that power -- don't for the moment argue the practical problems in current "democracy" -- just muse on whether you'd want an enemy controlling "platforms". If not, then you should resist Masnick's corporatized view that hands over such power asserting that "platforms" have "First Amendment" Right. -- Show me that Right in the Constitution. You can't. It's another artificial construct by lawyers and Masnicks.
Where would you go if banned by Facebook, Google, and all other large platforms? Including BANKS? -- All at once: as "persons" they're allowed to collude against dangers. -- You can be worse than marginalized: with minor increase of the principle and a little "script", your bank accounts and indeed all of "you" that's held in electronics can be disappeared with one click. YOU'D BE AN UNPERSON, just as in the book.
Present "platforms" are just using prior and minor Nazis as excuse to inch closer to their REAL goal: GLOBAL control BY neo-Nazis.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This was going into The Maz's just prior pro-corporate piece, but fits here:
out_of_the_blue just hates it when due process is enforced.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ahem.
"That should have terrified everyone, but didn't, and so the program went on. "
Like the seizure of domains without due process? Like having Pay-pal freeze accounts and funds without due process? Like.. Well, you got my point. At least some good in a sea of bad these days eh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So when you threaten their porn, suddenly they care about overreach into perfectly legal things...Yet they continue trying to kill off planned parenthood who are doing things legally.
Hurm.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It seems to me that only because Operation Choke Point started targeting racist/Nazi groups and sites in response to Charlottesville have they decided to put a stop to it.
But at least they realized that if they just exempted "racist materials" alone that they would face the same kind of backlash that Donald did.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
And rightfully so.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
This is just the formal ending, the program unofficially ceased on January 29th, 2015.
The latest Choke Point letter is a response to a request from August 10th, predating Charlottesville. The official termination of the program has nothing to do with "Racists" -- Non-partisan groups like ACA International have been pushing for this change for years
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not the only ones
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah, some others got caught up by it, but it was originally designed as a straight up executive order-able gun control initiative to drive smaller businesses under financially by fiat instead of legislatively.
Hope this doesn't change your opinion about how bad a policy it was, because that would mean you think picking and choosing which Amendments are "legitimate" is ok.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Count your blessings
How did she get so lucky? It's like a hooker with the clap refusing to screw you unprotected.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]