King's College Football Coach Sued For Copyright Infringement For Retweeting A Book Page 2 Years Ago
from the flag-on-the-play dept
We cover many petty intellectual property lawsuits here at Techdirt. After a while, you kind of become somewhat numb to them and the only mildly ridiculous lawsuits seem sort of... meh. But every once in a while you run into a real doozy, the sort of lawsuit that really gets the anger juices flowing. The copyright infringement lawsuit brought by author Dr. Keith Bell against King's College and its football coach, Jeff Knar, is one of those lawsuits.
A timeline is required here, for reasons that will become readily apparent. In 1982, the year I happen to have been born (skypoint for myself), Bell published a 72 page book called Winning Isn't Normal. The book is supposed to be of motivational nature, prodding the reader to win at sports, games and life, or something. Fast forward to 2015, when the Twitter account for Northeastern State University's baseball team tweeted out an image of a single page from the book. Also in 2015, King's College coach Knarr retweeted that tweet. Now fast forward to late 2017, when Knarr and the school are being sued by Bell for that retweet.
Almost two years after the retweet, Knarr and his employer were sued for copyright infringement over the retweet. Seems more than petty to sue over this so there has to be something else motivating this lawsuit. Actual damages can't equate to much and will be almost impossible to prove. Knarr does have a fair use defense since he did only retweet one page of a much larger work. Bell seeks damages and his attorneys' fees associated with the lawsuit.
It should be plain that lawsuits of this kind are plainly ridiculous. It's not direct copyright infringement. It's almost certainly not contributory infringement. Regardless, Knarr and the school have all kinds of Fair Use arguments that they can make at court. That said, it's likely that Bell has no interest in actually going to court, and is instead looking for a quick settlement, which I assume is the reason for including Knarr's employer in the legal action.
Now, Bell sent a cease and desist letter to NSU in 2016, the original tweeter, which took the tweet and image down. While that likewise broke the retweet by Knarr, Bell's lawsuit says it had been available for nearly a year. On top of that, Bell holds the trademark to the phrase "Winning isn't normal", and so is suing for trademark infringement as well. Over a retweet, where the phrase appeared on the same image that is supposedly infringing his copyrights.
Describing what appears to be a casual retweet as "willful, intentional and purposeful" infringement carried out "in disregard of and with indifference to Plaintiff's rights," Bell demands damages and attorneys fees from Knarr and his employer.
It should be clear that this is nonsense. Retweeting is not the same as republishing and holding individual members of the public responsible for copyright infringement, even if they happen to work for a college that has money, over retweets of content that maybe kinda sorta is copyright infringement is the kind of legal action that practically begs for a reprimand.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, keff knarr, keith bell, retweet
Companies: king's college
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Copyright is madness.
Someone thinking a single page being seen without them being paid is worth the courts time, is insane.
Copyright no longer seems to push them to create more works, but instead to sit & wait to pounce for a payday well outside of reality.
"Winning isn't normal"™ so you should expect to have your ass handed to you & I pray the courts award your targets their costs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: That Anonymous Coward
Hugs and kisses - JustMe
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: That Anonymous Coward
I never said I was a good guy, just that I never shook down senior citizens for their medicare checks.
By all means challenge me on the things you disagree with (hell even if you approve of them), I am fallible & can adapt.
I can't always be right because "Winning isn't normal"™, but I'm usually on the right side of things.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: That Anonymous Coward
This is why I've been coming to TD, and supporting it, since well before The Streisand Effect was coined (and I was in that thread on the day!).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: That Anonymous Coward
It's hard to tell sometimes because I do not respond well to the people who attack my grammar & phrasing. That's often the only feedback I get, and I tend to eviscerate them and move on.
I've learned about things here on TD that I wasn't aware of before, and I've expanded areas I am interested in. I grew from a 1 trick pony pointing out copyright trolls, to the odd person I am today. ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So let's game the system and be coercive.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And yet we have such a mess of a system and such a sense of entitlement from a portion of the "creators" (I'm using the term loosely) that this lawsuit is actually happening.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Still...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Class (016) - Paper, cardboard and goods made from these materials, not included in other classes; printed matter; bookbinding material; photographs; stationery; adhesives for stationery or household purposes; artists' materials; paint brushes; typewriters and office requisites (except furniture); instructional and teaching material (except apparatus); plastic materials for packaging (not included in other classes); printers' type; printing blocks."
Does anyone know if that therefore applies to this case, an electronic communication?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In case you want to write a review...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: In case you want to write a review...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bell should be shot...
He's obviously been bitten by a rabid copyright lawyer, and needs medical treatment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bell should be shot...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Transformation
Bell wasn't happy with indifference, so he's turned it into utter disdain. Well done!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not his first time
He sued a high school coach:
http://www.hinsdale86.org/sb/Documents/11%2017%2014%20Regular%20Action/action%20D%20copyright. pdf
Another school district:
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/washington/wawdce/2:2013cv01620/195731/ 21/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
His lawsuits continue
[ link to this | view in chronology ]