Confluence Brewing Sues Confluence On 3rd, An Apartment Complex, For Trademark Infringement

from the i'd-like-to-rent-a-beer-please? dept

Mon, Feb 12th 2018 7:52pm — Timothy Geigner

It's been a minute since we've had to cover some trademark nonsense in the beer industry. In fact, several recent stories have actually represented what might be mistaken for a clapback on aggressive trademark protectionism in the alcohol space. But, like all great things, it just couldn't last. The specific tomfoolery that has brought reality crashing down on us once again comes out of Iowa, where Confluence Brewing has filed a trademark suit against Confluence On 3rd, which is an apartment complex that does not serve or make beer.

Confluence Brewing Company on Friday filed a trademark lawsuit and motion for an injunction in Polk County District Court seeking to stop Confluence on 3rd apartments from using the name "Confluence."

John Martin, president and co-founder of Confluence Brewing, said representatives of the company have tried to have discussions with Roers Companies, the Long Lake, Minnesota-based developer of Confluence on 3rd and several other Des Moines-area properties, but felt that their complaints were "falling on deaf ears."

Those complaints appear to have centered around both companies using the word "confluence" and the potential public confusion that could cause. Which is really dumb. Because the brewery sells beer and the apartment complex rents apartments. A greater deviation in marketplaces I dare say could not be dreamed. And, yet, Confluence Brewing appears to have taken its opponent's refusal to negotiate on these invalid complaints as some sort of personal affront. After some back and forth about whether Confluence On 3rd might add the word "apartments" to the brand, it seems communication ceased. Jeff Koch, a principal at the parent company for Confluence On 3rd, had been a part of these conversations, but communication with him too was rebuffed.

Which isn't to say that Koch won't explain to the media just how ridiculous this all is.

The two companies have distinct names and operate in different business sectors, Koch said in his email to the Register. He said Confluence on 3rd has not experienced any confusion in the marketplace.

"Confluence on 3rd was named solely on the historic relevance the city was founded at the confluence of the Des Moines and Raccoon rivers," Koch said in his email to the Register. "It is unique to Des Moines history and should be celebrated, not solely owned and dictated by one brewing company."

This is essentially the localization of the aspect of trademark law that prevents a single company from locking up language globally. The whole point of trademark law is to prevent customer confusion within a given market, so that one brewer can't pass themselves off as another by having similar names and branding. That just isn't a concern here, given the disparity in the markets in which these two companies play. So, what got us to the point of having Confluence Brewing alleging true concern about public confusion?

Beer coasters, largely.

In April 2017, court documents show, Confluence Brewing called Roers Companies asking them to cease and desist their use of blue drink coasters promoting Confluence on 3rd at Des Moines bars.

"I just think the bar coasters just seem a little bit blatant," Kerndt said. "I mean, they were being distributed at establishments that serve my clients’ beer."

Emails between Kerndt and Koch show Confluence on 3rd had distributed all their coasters by the time of the April call and have not ordered any additional coasters since then.

Which is entirely besides the point. Just because a company puts out the tchotchke of its choice doesn't suddenly put it in a competitive situation with anyone who makes those tchotchkes. If that were the case, the tchotchke market as a whole wouldn't... you know... exist. The only other type of confusion mentioned in the article for Confluence Brewing is that apparently people's Google map skills occasionally send them to the wrong Confluence company for the wrong item. Still, that isn't the type of confusion trademark law is supposed to prevent and it's easily remedied by directing the customer to another address.

I will say that Confluence Brewing comes off as very earnest on the matter, so perhaps the folks there simply aren't aware of the intricacies of trademark law. Its legal team, on the other hand, certainly should be.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: apartment, beer, brewing, confluence, trademark
Companies: confluence brewing, confluence on 3rd

35 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Christenson, 12 Feb 2018 @ 8:06pm

Confluence of...idiots
Confluence of foolish brewers and greedy lawyers?
Confluence of foolish brewere and rule 11 damages? (let's hope!)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 12 Feb 2018 @ 8:11pm

out_of_the_blue's heroes, ladies and gentlemen, glorious corporate purveyors of intellectual property law.

You'd think that if IP law was so predominant they wouldn't constantly be staffed by litigious idiots...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pixelation, 12 Feb 2018 @ 9:58pm

Confluence on 3rd? I want to know, who's on first?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Stephen T. Stone (profile), 13 Feb 2018 @ 1:15am
  
  Re:
  The Band.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- bhull242 (profile), 13 Feb 2018 @ 8:33am
  
  Re:
  Yes.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ron Currier (profile), 12 Feb 2018 @ 10:10pm

Will software be next?
So after this will they go after Confluence - Team Collaboration Software? After all, programmers drink beer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
  
  Anonymous Coward, 13 Feb 2018 @ 9:05am
  
  Re: Will software be next?
  Hey, "Ron Currier": any hope of your explaining the SIX YEAR GAP after your first comment in 2010? Inquiring minds want to inquire.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Christenson, 13 Feb 2018 @ 9:53am
    
    Inquiring minds need imagination
    So, "Ron Currier" was only moved to post on techdirt once every six years...
    
    Maybe it's not even THE SAME person...maybe Ron is a loyalist of THE REGISTER,(theregister.co.uk) or slashdot, and doesn't come here often, so he is a casual user, in which case welcome back...and maybe he feels that Confluence the software is just obscure enough but in his area of familiarity to finally need his comment.
    
    It's a reasonably insightful and funny comment, why do you need to beat up someone for being a little different?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - An Onymous Coward (profile), 13 Feb 2018 @ 10:58am
    
    Re: Re: Will software be next?
    Not really, no. Inquiring minds don't give a rat's ass. Now piss off.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - The Wanderer (profile), 13 Feb 2018 @ 8:59pm
    
    Re: Re: Will software be next?
    It is a sign of intelligence to avoid saying anything except when you have something to say.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
PaulT (profile), 13 Feb 2018 @ 12:48am

I use Confluence all the time... in the JIRA setup I administer. Are they going to go after everybody who uses this particular generic word?

https://www.atlassian.com/software/confluence

Yet again, if you're going to be so paranoid and protective over the name you choose for the your company, don't choose a word that's in the dictionary and has nothing directly to do with your product. You will have a bad time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Berenerd (profile), 13 Feb 2018 @ 4:21am

To be fair....
When you have enough beers, you can confuse anything. I mean, do you really want a drunk...I mean a loyal customer, stumbling into an apartment building demanding a beer and settling for a Sam Adams winter larger that was handed to them by a resident? They might loose business!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- PaulT (profile), 13 Feb 2018 @ 4:41am
  
  Re: To be fair....
  Larger? Loose? Have you been drinking again?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 13 Feb 2018 @ 7:20am
    
    Re: Re: To be fair....
    It could be that autocorrect is doing the drinking and not him. I sometime fight with it as well, and my browser spellcheck often tell me that correct spellings are incorrect, but that is likely because its database is too small.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 13 Feb 2018 @ 7:31am
      
      Re: Re: Re: To be fair....
      One source of spelling confusion is the difference between the various flavors of English, most notably British/American flavors.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - PaulT (profile), 13 Feb 2018 @ 7:47am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: To be fair....
        I can confirm that the difference between the words lose and loose remains the same between the two languages, and any Englishman should know how to refer correctly to lager.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - PaulT (profile), 13 Feb 2018 @ 7:46am
      
      Re: Re: Re: To be fair....
      I know, I was just poking fun :)
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
tin-foil-hat, 13 Feb 2018 @ 5:16am

Stupid
I hope the beer company (and others) lose their trademark protection. One common word as a trademark shouldn't be allowed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- NeghVar (profile), 13 Feb 2018 @ 7:48am
  
  Re: Stupid
  Common word in different industry, no. But common word in same or similar industry. I believe that could be valid. Apple never sued Apple Orthodontics for TM infringement because they are a totally different product and industry. A classic TM troll is Monster Cable.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Feb 2018 @ 6:27am

Merging rivers everywhere say WUT?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NeghVar (profile), 13 Feb 2018 @ 7:37am

When I think beer, I don't go to Confluence on 3rd apartment complex confused that they serve beer in their lobby. This is not trademark infringement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Hero, 13 Feb 2018 @ 8:10am

Suit Triangle
So, when is Atlassian going to sue Confluence Brewing over trademark infringement of their Confluence collaberation software?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

Anonymous Coward, 13 Feb 2018 @ 9:04am

HA! Same day as I pointed out the prior four ANOTHER SIX YEAR GAP ZOMBIE POPS UP! -- And who better attracts them than Geigner?
Yes, "Ron Currier", commented ONCE in 2010, SIX YEAR GAP then 4 times in 2016, ONCE in 2017, and again here!

So FIVE "accounts" having SIX YEAR GAPS. I now think that the fun for Techdirt is that the fanboys so resolutely IGNORE this inexplicable pattern.

Congratulations, Geigner. You are truly The Zombie Maker, I mean Master.

For anyone new who doesn't believe how ODD this site is, here again the prior four:

dickeyrat: 3 comments TOTAL in TEN years! Aug 17th, 2017, Jun 23rd, 2011, and Jul 10th, 2010!!! https://www.techdirt.com/user/dickeyrat

https://www.techdirt.com/user/andrewlduane On May 1st, 2017

https://www.techdirt.com/user/slowgreenturtle Dec 15th, 2016

Advocate (changed to Keisar Betancourt and back!) 5 Sep 2013 from 18 Aug 2007 https://www.techdirt.com/comments.php?start=60&u=advocate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- An Onymous Coward (profile), 13 Feb 2018 @ 11:01am
  
  Re: HA! Same day as I pointed out the prior four ANOTHER SIX YEAR GAP ZOMBIE POPS UP! -- And who better attracts them than Geigner?
  Just shut up. You're not a special snowflake.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 13 Feb 2018 @ 11:56am
  
  Re: HA! Same day as I pointed out the prior four ANOTHER SIX YEAR GAP ZOMBIE POPS UP! -- And who better attracts them than Geigner?
  I just made 20 zombie accounts, with the names taken from random words used in your posts. They will not be used again for six years, or until the next time you become extremely annoying. Be prepared!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - PaulT (profile), 14 Feb 2018 @ 12:41am
    
    Re: Re: HA! Same day as I pointed out the prior four ANOTHER SIX YEAR GAP ZOMBIE POPS UP! -- And who better attracts them than Geigner?
    "six years, or until the next time you become extremely annoying."
    
    One of those time scales seems significantly shorter than the other, for some reason...
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 13 Feb 2018 @ 6:49pm
  
  Re: HA! Same day as I pointed out the prior four ANOTHER SIX YEAR GAP ZOMBIE POPS UP! -- And who better attracts them than Geigner?
  Another trademark fuck-up, and this is the best you could come up with, of course. Any time you fail to defend your heroes in IP is a good time.
  
  Nice going, you Budweiser fellatio artist.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- PaulT (profile), 14 Feb 2018 @ 12:43am
  
  Re: HA! Same day as I pointed out the prior four ANOTHER SIX YEAR GAP ZOMBIE POPS UP! -- And who better attracts them than Geigner?
  I wonder, do you obsessively investigate other sites? If not, you actually don't know if this is a common trend among long-running sites or if it's unique to Techdirt. Your own premise falls apart on a faulty assumption straight off the bat.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
John85851 (profile), 13 Feb 2018 @ 10:08am

Koblenz, Germany
Here's a tip for Confluence Brewery:
The last time I went to Germany, I visited a city called Koblenz. Since the name means "confluence" in German and since it's located on the confluence of 2 rivers, I naturally assumed the city was either named after Confluence Brewery or had some kind of endorsement deal.
Would you please go ahead and file a trademark dispute against the city for daring to use the word "confluence"? Using a different language doesn't mean they can get around trademark infringement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- nasch (profile), 14 Feb 2018 @ 8:42am
  
  Re: Koblenz, Germany
  
  Using a different language doesn't mean they can get around trademark infringement.
  
  Just ask the site Que Pasa (sued by What's Up).
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oblate (profile), 13 Feb 2018 @ 12:19pm

This inspires a much needed grouping term
There are terms for groups of animals, such as a colony of weasels, a mischief of rats, etc. This is well known.

I propose that a number of meritless and ill-considered lawsuits be termed a confluence, for example "The judge received a confluence of lawsuits from various breweries, and after review placed them in the public restroom."

Not that anyone would need my permission to use this term, but feel free to use as needed (which may be often).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
michael, 13 Feb 2018 @ 2:25pm

It's "BESIDE the point"
It seems like every time Timothy Geigner writes an article he uses "besides the point" -- which is INCORRECT -- rather than "beside the point."

It shouldn't be hard with a modicum of thought to see which is obviously wrong and which is obviously correct.

I realize Tim doesn't read the comments (or he would have seen the other ten times I've corrected him on this), but I refuse to give up the good fight.

Use your fool head when writing, or get a damn editor.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 14 Feb 2018 @ 5:50am
  
  Re: It's "BESIDE the point"
  Maybe he means it as a plural?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Dark Helmet (profile), 14 Feb 2018 @ 6:16am
  
  Re: It's "BESIDE the point"
  You seem very fun, but that's besides the point....
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Feb 2018 @ 7:09pm

Too Drunk
If they have any customer confusion, then the customer has already located too many of their products.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]