Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
from the the-things-we-say dept
This week, our first place winner on the insightful side is an anonymous commenter with a response to the Goldman Sachs analyst asking whether curing patients is a sustainable business model:
If curing patients is not a sustainable business model then perhaps health care should not be a for profit endeavor.
Obviously, treating the symptoms will be much more profitable than curing the disease, however - what kind of an asshole verbalizes such revolting thoughts. Everyone has dumbass ideas, but most refrain from embarrassing themselves with same.
In second place, we've got a comment from That Anonymous Coward in the discussion about his own recent Twitter suspension:
The easiest solution is to make people use the tools they have been given.
Dislike a word? Filter it.
Think that users a tool? Block them.Reporting shouldn't be a weapon, it should be more like 911 when something serious is happening... not because McD's is out of fscking nuggets.
Because everyone has a different level of comfort its impossible to have a single approach, and in trying to do it you just piss both sides off a bit more each time.
For editor's choice on the insightful side, we've got a comment about the MPAA's quiet shutdown of its legal movie search engine. We noted that to succeed the company must innovate, and Personanongrata spelled out in more detail why they feel like they don't have to:
Au contraire, MPAA can continue to hire lobbyists to shape the "law" in the industries favor while using the states security agencies (eg FBI, DHS) and courts to investigate industry related violations of the "law" at tax-payer expense.
MPAA can also retain swarms of attorneys to harass/intimidate/litigate.
Next, we've got an anonymous upgrade to our suggestion that pre-1972 sound recordings need to be unified under federal copyright law:
Or how about we just put them in the public domain now? If someone hasn't made money in 46 years or more, the next 46 years are unlikely to be much more profitable.
Over on the funny side, our first place comment comes from Roger Strong in response to our post about a copyright troll accusing Google, Popehat and BoingBoing of "black hat SEO":
This guy doesn't care about his reputation. What he's desperate for is attention and relevance. Before trying to trash him via SEO, remember the old saying:
"If only our tongues were made of glass. How much more careful we would be when we speak."
- John F. Kennedy
In second place, we've got Capt ICE Enforcer with another response to the MPAA's search engine shutdown:
Not good
Great. Now I need to find a pirate site to show me where all the legal content is...
For editor's choice on the funny side, we start out with Pixelation applying some Apple branding to the company's leaked memo warning employees not to leak stuff:
Oh, the iRONY.
And finally, we've got an anonymous comment about the New Hampshire first amendment ruling that said it's okay to call a patent troll a patent troll:
Reminds me of the Brit who was haled into magistrate's court for calling a noblewoman "pig". The magistrate fined him.
"So that means I can't call a duchess "pig"?" he asked.
"No, you can't," the magistrate explained.
"But can I call a pig "duchess"?
"Yes."
So he strolled out of the courtroom, nodding to the plaintiff and saying "Good day, duchess."
That's all for this week, folks!
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Apocryphal stories
There was no British guy... hauled into court... duchess... pig... etc.
E
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Apocryphal stories
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Curing patients.....
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2015/01/05/america_s_poor_vs_the_rest_of_the_world.html
htt ps://www.americashealthrankings.org/learn/reports/2016-annual-report/comparison-with-other-nations
(v ery big article..)
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/03/12/how-do-americans-stand-out-from-the-rest-o f-the-world/
https://www.livestrong.com/article/36536-top-health-problems-america/
Good luck living here..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Oh, MISSED "TripMN" or "Trip W" as began, now
14 TOTAL comments, 3 per year, but only because RE-ACTIVATED LATELY, 7 comments in 2018! After ZOMBIE 2 year, 10 month! Begun Jan 31st, 2014.
ODD, huh?
Nope, at Techdirt, it's normal! Fanboys don't notice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
It is only odd to you. Everyone else does not care.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Never have. Never will.
I agree in principle though. Two of us agree. You've got a few billion people on this planet and five up on the ISS to go.
E
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Are you unable to express yourself other than by asking me about me?
Tell me about yourself.
Please elucidate.
E
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Oh... didn't answer your question," but come to think of it, yeah, me did?
E
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh, MISSED "TripMN" or "Trip W" as began, now
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh, MISSED "TripMN" or "Trip W" as began, now
Of course if you go look for TripMN (not logged in to my user) you will find out I have a lot more comments where I just type in my name instead of signing in... but as I said, I'm a tad bit lazy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Oh, MISSED "TripMN" or "Trip W" as began, now
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Such a missed opportunity
If I had an old account I'd be tempted to do exactly that just to watch them flip out again(which never gets old). Sadly I went straight from AC to TOG, so I lack an account to 'resurrect'.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
If you think profiles matter that much, make your own so your words will have more importance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180419/17513039676/how-twitter-suspended-account-one-our-co mmenters-offending-himself.shtml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Deflection from the original point is not an argument. And again: If you believe having an account here increases the importance of your voice, make an account of your own.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Such as this week, when 3 of the 8 winners were anonymous commenters.
But it's not like he had any way of knowing that. I mean, it's not like he could have read the article he was commenting on or some crazy thing like that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
For Some Reason ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: For Some Reason ...
Odd, it worked that time. My original comments on this article were held for moderation, but I see they have been approved now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: For Some Reason ...
waiting for the ramifications..
Legit or not...NOW we dont go there..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]