Apple Sued An Independent Norwegian Repair Shop In Bid To Monopolize Repair -- And Lost
from the high-horse dept
A few years ago, annoyance at John Deere's obnoxious tractor DRM birthed a grassroots tech movement. John Deere's decision to implement a lockdown on "unauthorized repairs" turned countless ordinary citizens into technology policy activists, after DRM and the company's EULA prohibited the lion-share of repair or modification of tractors customers thought they owned. These restrictions only worked to drive up costs for owners, who faced either paying significantly more money for "authorized" repair, or toying around with pirated firmware just to ensure the products they owned actually worked.
The John Deere fiasco resulted in the push for a new "right to repair" law in Nebraska. This push then quickly spread to multiple other states, driven in part by consumer repair monopolization efforts by other companies including Apple, Sony and Microsoft. Lobbyists for these companies quickly got to work trying to claim that by allowing consumers to repair products they own (or take them to third-party repair shops), they were endangering public safety. Apple went so far as to argue that if Nebraska passed such a law, it would become a dangerous "mecca for hackers" and other rabble rousers.
Apple's efforts in particular to monopolize repair run deep. The company has worked alongside the Department of Homeland Security and ICE to seize counterfeit parts in the United States and raid shops of independent iPhone repair professionals. FOIA efforts to obtain details on just how deeply rooted Apple is in ICE's "Operation Chain Reaction" have been rejected. The efforts to "combat counterfeit goods" often obscures what this is really about for Apple: protecting a lucrative repair monopoly and thwarting anybody that might dare repair Apple devices for less money.
And Apple's efforts on this front are a decidedly global affair. More recently, Apple has been harassing an independent repair shop owner in Norway named Henrik Huseby. After Norway customs officials seized a shipment of 63 iPhone 6 and 6S replacement screens on their way to Huseby's repair shop, Apple threatened to sue the store owner unless they agreed to stop using aftermarket screens and pay a hefty settlement:
"In order to avoid being sued, Apple asked Huseby for “copies of invoices, product lists, order forms, payment information, prints from the internet and other relevant material regarding the purchase [of screens], including copies of any correspondence with the supplier … we reserve the right to request further documentation at a later date."
The letter, sent by Frank Jorgensen, an attorney at the Njord law firm on behalf of Apple, included a settlement agreement that also notified him the screens would be destroyed. The settlement agreement said that Huseby agrees “not to manufacture, import, sell, market, or otherwise deal with any products that infringe Apple’s trademarks,” and asked required him to pay 27,700 Norwegian Krone ($3,566) to make the problem go away without a trial."
How sweet. Huseby decided to fight the case, and despite being out-manned five Apple lawyers to one, managed to win. And despite Apple's ongoing claims that it's simply engaged in a moral crusade against counterfeiters, Huseby's lawyer is quick to reiterate what Apple's methods are really all about:
"In this case, Apple indirectly proves what they really want,” Per Harald Gjerstad, Huseby’s lawyer, told me in an email. “They want monopoly on repairs so they can keep high prices. And they therefore do not want to sell spare parts to anyone other than ‘to themselves.’"
Apple's real motivation is the protection of their lucrative repair monopoly enjoyed thanks to their "Authorized Service Provider" program, which requires that repair companies become authorized by paying Apple a fee, only buy "authorized" repair parts from Apple at a fixed rate, and limits what repairs a third-party vendor can actually perform. Meanwhile, Apple continues to lobby against right to repair laws in 18 states around the United States, all of which require hardware vendors sell replacement parts and repair tools to the general public and independent repair companies.
Ironically, the harder Apple and other companies fight against this trend, the more support they drive toward these right to repair bills.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: counterfeits, homeland security, ice, norway, right to repair, trademark
Companies: apple
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Sorry Karl,
This is not a lucrative repair monopoly, it is a lucrative `buy a new one' business.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sorry Karl,
Of course making repairs expensive is good for sales of new products... so Apple has several good reasons for its anti-competitive behaviour.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sorry Karl,
It's a defective power supply or loose connector, but it's always the motherboard and it's going to cost more to repair than to replace.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
good things pass.
Apple makes some good products, but for me, I don't like to pay to be allowed to play in some manufacturer's walled garden.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: good things pass.
Their laptops are overpriced and nothing special. The only reason Apples products are viable is because they have ravenous fanboys that will buy anything if it is shiny and made by Apple. Oh, and because they have a closed platform so they can control what hardware works with their equipment.
I will give you that the design is smoother and feels less clunky than other systems but since I like playing games I would prefer to have a more powerful system for the price of an Apple system.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Apple
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Dang, out_of_the_blue's not going to like this, is he?
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140117/10562125920/copyright-week-fair-use-is-not-exceptio n-rule.shtml#c158
"out_of_the_blue" has been mentioned at least three times today! Because the fanboys need a target for ad hom, they've nothing on topic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Dang, out_of_the_blue's not going to like this, is he?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Dang, out_of_the_blue's not going to like this, is he?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Dang, out_of_the_blue's not going to like this, is he?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Replying to yourself in the third person makes you sound crazy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
but are Apple "counterfeit" parts necessarily counterfeit?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: but are Apple "counterfeit" parts necessarily counterfeit?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: but are Apple "counterfeit" parts necessarily counterfeit?
Apple screen glass breaks but display is still good. Repair shop sends these screens to china and has the glass replaced creating a refurbished part. Repair shop gets back Apple screen with Apple part numbers so phone can't be bricked by Apple latter with update like they did with fingerprint scanners.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Magic
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Magic
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
PIRATE PROXY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
General Terms.
By selecting a product or service, you agree to pay FreeMovieSite.me the one-time and/or monthly or annual subscription fees indicated ... "
It seems Free Movie Site is not a free movie site.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So, after hearing how evil Micro$oft was, I checked into Apple...and found I couldn't even do THAT? Couldn't build my own (which I did with my second and all subsequent computers for many years)? Screw that. I could deal with 'evil', didn't even have any interest in "proprietary". Screw Apple.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You...do realize that you can't do that in an MS operating system anymore either, right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Fair enough. (That was me; forgot to put my name on it. At least, I assume you're replying to my post; I've got anons blocked, so I can't actually see the post you're responding to.)
I don't know how important the distinction between booting to a command line and opening a command line inside a graphical environment is, really. I'm a Linux user, and I'm perfectly comfortable in a terminal, but if I'm actually dropping to a VT (as opposed to opening a Terminal app inside X), then it means Something Has Gone Wrong.
There are a lot of reasons I prefer not to use MacOS or Windows. But "because if I want to use a terminal I have to open it in a window" isn't one of them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You can build your own Apple-compatible machine. You just have to use specific parts because OSX doesn't carry drivers for All The Things like Windows does (or supports). It's not that their machines are a "walled garden", they just focussed on supporting specific hardware very well rather than trying to support everything poorly.
I'm no Apple fanboi (I use both Windows and OSX daily) but your talking point is flawed. Both have their pros and cons.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Apple has always let customers choose their own cover color, as long as the choice was white.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: H a C K I N T O S H ref?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Getting tired of seeing this is the only damn thing the company can do anymore.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In any of the states where Apple is fighting the law. just bring up the battery thing.
We made the machine secretly work WORSE, b/c we were getting a huge amount of money replacing a battery & it drove sales of the newest iThingy.
When this was made public, suddenly they started back peddling said they would be honest about what was happening... oh and the price to replace the battery was slashed down to about twice what you'd pay online to get one. Their costs to get the battery didn't sudden magically change, the effort to get into the iThingy didn't get easier, changing the connection didn't get easier... but somehow they were able to slash their very high price down to an almost reasonable number.
This wasn't from some heartfelt gesture, this was trying to deal with the PR nightmare that they made older phones work worse (so they would keep working!!) & they were charging a huge amount to replace the battery & nudge people towards the latest new shiny thing.... that secretly would do the same thing if not for some evil bastard opening up their phone & finding out what the hell was going on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What happened to the screens?
The the repair shop get the seized screens back, or are they still in the hands of customs?
If Apple can prevent Huseby's shop from getting supplies, it can still kill its competition with Apple's repair monopoly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
simple solution: revoke the Apple trademark (yes, really)
Your lawyer sends a snot-o-gram about not being allowed by their trademark to repair a device that i own? Their trademark should just go *poof*. Worldwide.
when the customer clearly knows that he's buying a 3rd party replacement part that conforms to all specs for that part and the manufacturer clearly markets such parts as 3rd party replacement parts and you still persist, then you don't deserve to have a trademark in the first place. What you really want/need are handcuffs.
The purpose of the trademark system is to clearly mark the source ORIGIN of a product/service for customers to make an INFORMED decision, not to prevent others from making available similar or compatible products/services when they are clearly labelled as being 3rd party ones.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trademark abuse
When governments care to protect public interests (including consumer interests) then it might create a watchdog institution to look for abuse of trademarks (or abuse of other IP laws) of which there are plenty, the current incident showing one of them.
Right now, companies have found that it's more profitable contesting laws than adjusting their services to conform to consumer protections, so they do the former.
In the US, regulatory capture is epidemic. I don't know the case in Norway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]