This Shouldn't Need Saying: Threatening To Kill Anyone Over Net Neutrality Is Idiotic
from the bring-back-civility dept
It's indisputable that Ajit Pai's attack on net neutrality was a facts-optional hatchet job of historical proportions. Pai ignored the public, the experts, ethical boundaries, and FCC guidelines as he rushed to give a sloppy wet kiss to some of the most disliked and anti-competitive companies in any American industry. Making matters worse, Pai repeatedly rubbed salt in the wound by behaving like a tone-deaf ass at numerous points during the bizarre and amateurish gambit.
That said, however terrible Ajit Pai has been (and he has been historically terrible), it should go without saying that threatening the FCC boss or his family is both idiotic and counterproductive.
You'll recall that Pai was forced to cancel his appearance at CES back in January due to death threats. And late last week, the Department of Justice announced that it had arrested a 33-year old California man for sending e-mails that threatened both Pai's and his family's lives:
"The first email accused Chairman Pai of being responsible for a child who allegedly had committed suicide because of the repeal of net neutrality regulations. The second email listed three locations in or around Arlington, and threatened to kill the Chairman’s family members. The third email had no message in its body, but included an image depicting Chairman Pai and, in the foreground and slightly out of focus, a framed photograph of Chairman Pai and his family."
The full affadavit offers a little more detail, noting that the FBI didn't have to work very hard to identify the man behind the STUBBLEMANLINESS@GMAIL.COM address, from which the threats were made:
"The next day, on or about December 20, 2017, at approximately 3:47 p.m. EST, an email was sent from STUBBLEMANLINESS@GMAIL.COM to Federal Official 1 's government and personal email addresses. The subject line of the email was "Cheers" and the body of the email listed the names and addresses of three preschools located in or around Arlington, Virginia, followed by the following sentence: "I will find your children and I will kill them."
Again, it really shouldn't need saying that threatening any government official or their family over tech policy (net neutrality or anything else) is obviously utterly terrible, obnoxious and disgusting. It's also utterly counterproductive and self-defeating. In reality, this kind of behavior comprises a tiny, tiny fraction of the massive number of folks angry about the repeal. But Pai's staff has enjoyed singling out and highlighting these folks whenever possible to try and imply that opponents to Pai's ISP-cuddly policies are generally unhinged and unreasonable.
Besides, Pai has made it easy to dismantle his policy positions in an entirely civil manner without resorting to boorish behavior. This is an agency boss who not only turned a blind eye to fraud and identity theft during the public comment period, but also apparently helped make up a DDOS attack just to try and downplay the massive, bipartisan opposition to his policies. Pai doesn't have much of a leg to stand on when it comes to the facts -- so just stick to them.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ajit pai, death threats, fcc, net neutrality
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I wonder why
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Deaf ears
Ashit Pi is an asshole but threatening his children/family is not a way to make a difference.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Tyler Barriss, the shitbag behind the Wichita SWATting murder, claimed that he was the one behind the bomb hoax that disrupted Pai's internet-killing vote.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
preschools?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
It makes sense - he would be intimate enough with Pai to have a picture of his kids.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Reap what you sow, I guess
Yeah, that’s what happens when you lie about everything, Ajit. This is no different from the DDOS you lied about. And a vile piece of garbage like you is exactly the kind of person that would implicate the safety of their own family to stifle the speech of people that point out what an idiotic, lying slimeball you are.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Reap what you sow, I guess
Now that he’s found a story that works, expect repeat performances.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Reap what you sow, I guess
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Response to: is it ajitt? on Jul 3rd, 2018 @ 9:57pm
So threatening to kill him is pointless for purely practical reasons. He cannot die. He shall endure beyond all kin, shall crisp when the Sun goes supernova, and only after the last two neurons of his dissecated, evil brain are wrenched apart in the twilight of the slow billions of years of unfurling universal heat death, shall Ajit Pai cease to be. But fret not, for this eternal fuckstain, this embarrassing product of the human genome, must endure eternity knowing that all he ever was, is, or shall be, will only be Ajit Pai.
So, reasons not to threaten Ajit Pai: (1) it won’t work, (2) it’s illegal, (3) despite everything he has done to damage the progression of rational policy, it’s still immoral.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The same arguments against apply, whatever the claimed reason for the threat. Some may seem a little more justified than this, but it's still a pointless exercise that only gets authorities interested in you - while providing your target with a reasonable argument that they're in the right and the people on the other "side" are unreasonable.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I totally agree. I'll kill anyone who threatens to kill someone over something idiotic.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That said, I can understand the feeling in this specific case and generally in cases involving blatant corruption, cronyism. I mean, the moron is harming everybody without even caring about hiding the obvious telco dick stuck deep into his mouth. If we go a little back in time heads rolled literally in France for quite similar reasons. Sometimes I honestly think a few heads need to roll to remind politicians where the power resides but alas we theoretically are in more evolved times so I can't really advocate for that. Nor I actually would condone such thing even if it comes to mind when frustration hits badly.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: net neutrality
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat!
=======================
You might also note that somehow, Pai is able to simply give the middle finger to all attempts to investigate his crimes, without the slightest repercussion.
That's some serious (corporate) protection there. I mean hell, the man is immune to the law and nobody in power seems to mind.
Good thing there's no such thing as conspiracies huh.
Otherwise, one might get the notion that there is a concerted corporate effort world-wide, to destroy the internet as a means of anonymous public communications.
Anyone wanna cover my bet that Pai walks away from this mess unscathed, once the smoke clears and the internet is reduced to a selection of politically-neutered commercial walled-gardens at thrice today's cost to consumers?
I'd love to see his offshore bank accounts afterwards too. How much would you charge to do Corporate America's fascist dirty work, at this scale? :)
---
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Response to: is it ajitt? on Jul 3rd, 2018 @ 9:57pm
Reasons to threaten Ajit Pai:
(1) It can work and sends a message to his successors not to try the same crap again.
(2) So are Ajit Pai's actions, that doesn't seem to be stopping him. Rather, he's flaunting it knowing the current administration won't enforce the laws he's broken. So, Rule of Law has already been discarded with the bathwater here.
(3) The government continues to allow his blatant disregard for his sworn duties and out right handouts to the industry he's supposed to regulate. Actions which are illegal. So given the lack of support / empathy through the normal channels, it shouldn't supprise you that some people are wanting to go through alternate means to deal with the issue. Rationalised society only works with the agreement of all parties. When one side decides to screw over everybody else and refuses to negotiate, the only available options are based on force.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Umm ..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Response to: is it ajitt? on Jul 3rd, 2018 @ 9:57pm
1) No, it will never work, and only bolster opposition to the people doing it.
2) "They're breaking the law too" is never an excuse. If you want the higher ground, you need to occupy it first.
3) He was installed by Trump, and will likely be removed when a sane and competent administration returns. The trick is to minimise the amount of irreversible damage that he can do in the meantime, and to provide the opposition with the data they need to ensure they can support a quick reversal. Death threats achieve exactly the opposite of this.
"When one side decides to screw over everybody else and refuses to negotiate, the only available options are based on force."
Not really. But, even if they were, they would take the form of actual action from an organised opposition, not threats from random individuals. If you think "i'll say I'm going to stalk and kill your children" is a reasonable response to "I refuse to take proper public input about communications regulation", you might have things a little skewed.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Why not call such behavior "wrong?"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Response to: is it ajitt? on Jul 3rd, 2018 @ 9:57pm
When one side decides to screw over everybody else and refuses to negotiate, the only available options are based on force.
That is what the courts are for. Use them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat!
Nope: http://bfy.tw/IuCE
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Why not call such behavior "wrong?"
You guys are getting desperate for something to write, aren't you?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Response to: is it ajitt? on Jul 3rd, 2018 @ 9:57pm
We have elections and courts to settle these things peacefully. In every political battle there are losers.
If the losers refuse to accept the outcome peacefully, they become outlaws and criminals.
Go lobby. Get the laws changed. Find ways to solve your problems within existing law.
If you resort to violence, or the threat of violence, you are an enemy of civilization, and far worse than Pai.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Why not call such behavior "wrong?"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
not supporting him
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: not supporting him
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: net neutrality
Ok, I think this could have been more careful, its not ok, I think maybe this wasn't the right way to protest, There's no justification to threaten anyone just like there was no justification to give up net neutrality, but we must recognize that president Ajit Pai is mocking Americans imposing unjust policies for the consumer. I just hope when another administration comes in, we go back to net neutrality for all, but without threatening anyone, thats not good, cheers.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Deaf ears
[ link to this | view in thread ]