Pompous 'International Grand Committee' Signs Useless But Equally Pompous 'Declaration On Principles Of Law Governing The Internet'
from the they're-really-going-all-in-on-this dept
So just a few weeks after a bunch of countries (and companies and organizations) signed onto a weird and mostly empty Paris Call for Trust and Safety in Cyberspace, a group of nine countries -- Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Ireland, Latvia, Singapore and the UK, have declared themselves the "International Grand Committee on Disinformation and Fake News" and signed onto a Principles of the Law Governing the Internet. If that list of countries sound familiar, that's because it's the same list of countries that put on that grandstanding inquisition of Facebook that produced fake news in its own way, by falsely claiming that Facebook had discovered Russians extracting 3 billion data points via its API back in 2014 (it wasn't Russia, it was Pinterest; it wasn't 3 billion, it was 6 million; it wasn't abuse of the API, but using it correctly).
The Declaration makes some grand pronouncements:
Noting that:— the world in which the traditional institutions of democratic government operate is changing at an unprecedented pace; it is an urgent and critical priority for legislatures and governments to ensure that the fundamental rights and safeguards of their citizens are not violated or undermined by the unchecked march of technology; the democratic world order is suffering a crisis of trust from the growth of disinformation, the proliferation of online aggression and hate speech, concerted attacks on our common democratic values of tolerance and respect for the views of others, and the widespread misuse of data belonging to citizens to enable these attempts to sabotage open and democratic processes, including elections.
Affirming that:— representative democracy is too important and too hard-won to be left undefended from online harms, in particular aggressive campaigns of disinformation launched from one country against citizens in another, and the co-ordinated activity of fake accounts using data-targeting methods to try manipulate the information that people see on social media.
Believing that:— it is incumbent on us to create a system of global internet governance that can serve to protect the fundamental rights and freedoms of generations to come, based on established codes of conduct for agencies working for nation states, and govern the major international tech platforms which have created the systems that serve online content to billions of users around the world.
Okay. So what does it all mean? Well, here are the details of the "declaration":
i. The internet is global and law relating to it must derive from globally agreed principles;
ii. The deliberate spreading of disinformation and division is a credible threat to the continuation and growth of democracy and a civilising global dialogue;
iii. Global technology firms must recognise their great power and demonstrate their readiness to accept their great responsibility as holders of influence;
iv. Social Media companies should be held liable if they fail to comply with a judicial, statutory or regulatory order to remove harmful and misleading content from their platforms, and should be regulated to ensure they comply with this requirement;
v. Technology companies must demonstrate their accountability to users by making themselves fully answerable to national legislatures and other organs of representative democracy.
Of course, in the context of the committee who created this Declaration having now been revealed to have created "fake news" itself, this kind comes off pretty... weak. But also, the whole thing is kind of meaningless. The companies do recognize their "power" and have been trying to deal with this issue. Yes, perhaps they didn't grasp the severity of the issue in the past, but they certainly have more recently. But simple declarations and pronouncements don't really do anything useful in "solving" those issues. That's because much of it is a human nature issue, and expecting tech companies to "take responsibility" for human nature is... well... nonsense.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: argentina, belgium, brazil, canada, content moderation, disinformation, fake news, france, internet regulation, ireland, latvia, prais call, singapore, uk
Companies: facebook
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
1-4
If the internet should be governed by global principles, how can it uphold every local law?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 1-4
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: 1-4
What I've never been able to understand is how, given the incredibly repetitive nature of the above process throughout human history, why it is that government officials continually fail to recognize what they are setting into motion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They should then go on to say that government need to adapt themselves to the increased democracy that the Internet enables. Instead they are determined to control it to protect their own privileges.
The privileged classes failed to control the printing press, though their efforts resulted in a century or so of conflict. Can't the politicians learn from history, it is up to them to adapt to social changes, rather than fight them to preserve their privileges.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Supergood Doublespeak
Oh, and whose notion of free speech (an underpining of democracy) are they going to use? One where the 'right to be forgotten' is a viable thing? One where 'they' decide what is good speech and which is bad? One where non-democratic governments decide which speech is good (and since this is about democracy but they address every nation and not all nations are actual democracies despite what they claim for example the Democratic People's Republic of Korea also known as North Korea)?
Ah, got it. Like Trump, anything they don't like will be vile and disinformation (aka fake news), but unlike Trump the 'democratic' nosey Fourth Estate in the various entities will not be able to bring anything other than 'their' truth to the table. Situation Normal, All Fucked Up (aka SNAFU), and by design.
And to think this is all social medias fault. Not the users, the owners. What are they going to do when they find out it is in fact the users and not the owners? The private prison industry is going to blossom like an atomic bomb. Get your stocks now while they are cheap.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Solving problems is not the goal...
Very little of anything politicians do has anything to do with solving problems.
They all have two goals.
1. More power for themselves and their buddies.
2. More money for themselves and their buddies.
Everything they do is based on doing these two things. They do not care about actually solving problems but they do care about looking like they are solving problems to whatever group will help them in their quest for more power and money.
Despite all the political rhetoric politicians of any party do not really care about us. Some of them are more open about it than others but none of them really care about anything other than their own power.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Solving problems is not the goal...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fake!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Accords-ing to whom?
I swear I've seen something like this before...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Idiots Rule*
That's because much of it is a human nature issue, and expecting tech companies to "take responsibility" for human nature is... well... nonsense.
But.... but, what about the children?
Who will keep them safe?
Without a Pompous 'International Grand Committee' to protect the children the end is nigh.
* Thank you Janes Addiciton
Idiots Rule is a Jane’s Addiction song written in 1985.
Lyrics
I got a lie A fat fuckin’ lie About a law Idiots obey They made it easy Now cheaters have their way You hi-di-ho’s You’re living on your knees Forget the rule! Oh – idiots rule! Forget the rule! Oh – idiots rule! Idiot!
Now there’s a time man… But i say non like now There’s a time… Where idiots are bound If there’s a pole Planted in your back Then you’re a fixture You ain’t a man Forget the rule! Oh – idiots rule Forget the rule! Oh – idiots rule!
What’s this you mother fucker? Fuck it! Suck it! Damn it! Ahh!
Idiots! Idiots rule! Idiots! Idiots rule! Idiots! Idiots rule!
You know that man You hate? You look more like him Every day everyday Hi-di-hos! 2 good shoes Won’t save your soul, yeah Idiots rule! Idiots rule! Idiots rule! Yeah!
https://janesaddiction.org/songs/janes-addiction/idiots-rule/
https://www.youtube.com/wa tch?v=ie3NinwlX6A&feature=related
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Idiots Rule*
Thanks to 230 Mike is safe - but Personanongrata owes $150k us dollars for the infraction!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's not like the declaration did anything about the real issues.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ii. The deliberate spreading of disinformation and division is a credible threat to the continuation and growth of democracy and a civilising global dialogue;
We certainly wouldn't want people being allowed to vote on something until they've all agreed to cast their ballots the same way on it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
'We're the bosses, it's up to you to nerd harder!'
i. The internet is global and law relating to it must derive from globally agreed principles;
How about this one: 'Governments should not be in, nor place themselves in, a position where they get to decide what is and is not allowed, barring very specific laws relating to very specific actions/crimes, involving specific instances of violations.'
ii. The deliberate spreading of disinformation and division is a credible threat to the continuation and growth of democracy and a civilising global dialogue;
Disinformation according to who is the important counter-question to that. Depending on who you ask what is and is not 'legitimate' information rather than falsehoods can vary widely, and as for offense/'division', well, good luck getting a consistent definition for that that isn't the absolute most restrictive and thereby stifling.
iii. Global technology firms must recognise their great power and demonstrate their readiness to accept their great responsibility as holders of influence;
For some reason I suspect that what they mean as responsibility' is likely significantly more expansive than what many others would mean.
Does that 'responsibility' include getting rid of trolls? If so, see above point: As defined by who?
'False' information? Again, same question.
What about parody, 'blasphemy', or The Most Important Thing Ever, Without Which Creativity And Society Itself Would Not Work, also known as 'copyright'?
iv. Social Media companies should be held liable if they fail to comply with a judicial, statutory or regulatory order to remove harmful and misleading content from their platforms, and should be regulated to ensure they comply with this requirement;
Translation: If we pass stupid laws it's on them to comply and make it work! Also we should get to decide what is and is not allowed on (theoretically) their platforms.
v. Technology companies must demonstrate their accountability to users by making themselves fully answerable to national legislatures and other organs of representative democracy.
'If we want to drag you through the coals for a PR stunt you damn well better show up and put on a good show!'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 'We're the bosses, it's up to you to nerd harder!'
What do you mean I have that backwards?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: 'We're the bosses, it's up to you to nerd harder!'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: 'We're the bosses, it's up to you to nerd harder!'
Not like the honourable members of parliment who were turned into jackasses.
What?
They were always that way?
Nevermind?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There is only one solution....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]