Techdirt Podcast Episode 217: Public Interest Tech, With Bruce Schneier
from the for-the-good-of-all dept
Bruce Schneier is a name most Techdirt readers are very familiar with — he's a famous computer security expert who most recently has taken up the mantle of Public Interest Technologist, and been exploring exactly what that means. This week, Bruce joins us on the podcast to discuss how technologists can dedicate themselves to the common good.
Follow the Techdirt Podcast on Soundcloud, subscribe via iTunes or Google Play, or grab the RSS feed. You can also keep up with all the latest episodes right here on Techdirt.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: bruce schneier, podcast, policy, public interest tech, technology
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Okay, Maz: listened to this. First, your rapping "music" is
barely intelligible, which is good because just silly crude propaganda.
Then, you like, umm, giggle a lot? And have rising tones like asking question only it's really, like, a statement? Quite annoying. But I do admit that you sound a little more confident, less NPR-ey now, so improved over several years. (Bill Gates is still a fumbly nerd: if ever improved, still abysmal.)
I transcribe a segment that turns out only too typical:
MM: What do you mean when you say, a public interest technologist?
Schneier: So it's kind of a catch-all term. Ford Foundation defines it as technology practictioners who focus on social justice, the common good, and/or the public interest. Now, that feels kinda circular, but... I think we know it when we see it.
SO. Intuitive is good enough for Schneier; Masnick giggles but doesn't object.
As for substance: there ain't none! Just talking how wonderful it would be to get the right advisors onto Congressional staff and then have the (implied stupid AND ignorant)Congress-persons take the advice without question.
That's it, 39 minutes of wishing, but only about five for me with the Dash-Here player, including to type the above segment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Dude, we get it. The "public interest" makes you break out in a rash and piss your panties.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The part I don't get: what exactly is awful and horrifying about a senator asking Mark Zuckerberg how Facebook makes its money?
Seems to me that if your inquiry involves allegations of shady business practices, getting someone to explain their business model is not only useful but something that is necessary to establish on the record. What's the counter-argument here?
Because I'm not seeing why that's a bad thing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Oddly I thought something similar...
"Wait, did he ask the question because he didn't know, or because it needed to be something put in as a matter of public record? One of those two things is okay..."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]