Thanks Blizzard: Riot Games Forced To Let Everyone Know They're Allowed To Use Hong Kong's LoL Team's Name
from the riot-riot-riot dept
The fallout from Blizzard's heavy-handed move on a professional Hearthstone player for voicing support for the ongoing Hong Kong protests on a livestream, which included ripping away prize money and issuing a 1 year ban on competing, continues to blaze. But while most of the backlash has been directed solely at Blizzard, the company's actions are having a ripple effect across the eSports landscape.
Depressingly, plenty of folks in the eSports industry are clearly frightened that they might accidentally cross some undefined line with gaming companies and find themselves on the losing end of an international public relations argument. One lovely example of this is Riot Games' League of Legends competitions and streams. There appear to be plenty of folks out there that are self-censoring mentions of Hong Kong to ridiculous levels, including attempts to avoid saying the name of a LoL team, the Hong Kong Attitude.
With all the protests going on in Hong Kong, League of Legends casters appear to be avoiding saying the team name “Hong Kong Attitude” and seem to even be catching themselves when they do. Riot Games, however, says that it has not banned casters from saying “Hong Kong.”
Chinese conglomerate Tencent owns Riot and has a stake in Blizzard.
It may be that last detail that has so many streamers spooked. Still, this all reached enough of a fever pitch that Riot Games decided to put out several statements clarifying that its streamers can in fact refer to a League of Legends team and, tangentially, use the name of one of the more populous cities on the planet. The fact that it had to do this at all is fairly crazy, but the detail here really drives that point home.
To make this as explicit as possible, we aren't telling anyone to avoid saying "hong kong." We'd just rather the team be referred to by its full name. There's been some confusion internally about this as well and we're working to correct it.
— Ryan Rigney (@RKRigney) October 9, 2019
Again, this is crazy. A sentence that consists of "We aren't telling anyone to avoid saying 'Hong Kong'" shows just how effective Beijing's campaign of weaponized offense-taking has become. The entire point of the Chinese government's actions is to keep the Hong Kong protests out of the mouths of those that might be listened to. For this to morph into some of those people censoring themselves into not even mentioning the city's name for a competition that has an entrant from that city must feel like all of Xi Jinping's birthdays and Christmases came at once.
It is now long, long past time for these gaming companies, regardless of minority ownership stakes, to come out in support for the free expression of their employees and affiliates.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: chilling effects, china, esports, free speech, heathstone, hong kong, hong kong attitude, league of legends
Companies: blizzard, riot games, tencent
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Relevant:
“You can't have an apolitical response to a political statement. … Companies love to have their cake and fuck it, too. This is why so many game developers say that their games aren't political, even while exploiting political imagery and messaging. This is why so many corporations want to ‘leave politics at the door’ while making money from despotic regimes — why WWE will gladly take blood money from Saudi Arabia to perform shows for the benefit of murderous despots, but no longer has the fucking spine to even say ‘Saudi Arabia’ on its western broadcasts. Companies are terrified of making statements, without realizing that that terror is, itself, a statement.” — “Thank God For” Jim Sterling
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So it's fine to mention Hong Kong but notice how they implicitly said nothing about the protests. They're effectively saying not to mention the protests without actually saying it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Time to create a LoL team called "Hong Kong Protests" Whether they win or lose in competition, it'll make a statement.
If LoL won't allow anyone to create a team by that name... call it the Masked Umbrella Carriers instead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You either have freedom of speech or you don't. If you "self censor" because of the "damage" you might do to your Chinese business aspirations, you are part of the fucking problem. Grow a spine, say "FUCK YOU, CHINA" and stand behind the protesters in Hong Kong! If you allow "business" to dictate what you can and cannot say in AMERICA, then we have already lost!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
A fine sentiment. What do you personally have to lose if the Chinese government censors you?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is Capitalism at it's finest. When money says it's profitable to bow to a "communist" regime they'll likely do it. And people worshiping this broken system are the same that foam through the mouth when people like Ocasio-Cortez and Sanders try to level the playing field.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Except it is a false hope of market share.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Can you say "Riot?"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Great job!
Although there is a large number of people standing against the nomenclature of this game, but I think everybody has freedom to speak and other should respect it positively whether it would be right or wrong it does not matter! I am a professional expert at this great site ladbrokes and help the people with accurate tips, guidelines and ideas for playing casino game. Every body believes that gaming is a matter of luck where loss or win both could be happened! By the way, I like this Riot game and its name too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]