Cops Arrest 12-Year-Old For Pointing 'Finger Guns' At Classmates
from the finally-the-gov't-is-getting-serious-on-gun-control dept
If we keep insisting on putting cops in schools, things like this are never going to stop happening:
A 12-year-old Overland Park girl formed a gun with her fingers, pointed at four of her Westridge Middle School classmates one at a time, and then turned the pretend weapon toward herself.
Police hauled her out of school in handcuffs, arrested her and charged the child with a felony for threatening.
No one wants to talk about this case. Not the police. Not the school. And not the district. But the arrest no one wants to discuss is only the latest arrest of a minor over something extremely minor. Not that you'd assume it was minor if you read the court documents.
[A]ccording to Johnson County District Court documents, on Sept. 18, the girl “unlawfully and feloniously communicated a threat to commit violence, with the intent to place another, in fear, or with the intent to cause the evacuation, lock down or disruption in regular, ongoing activities …” or created just the risk of causing such fear.
This arrest over finger guns follows similar arrests of minors over things no one in their right mind would consider to be criminal acts. But the combination of zero tolerance policies and actual cops roaming school halls, this is what students have been subjected to in the recent past:
- A ten-year-old student arrested for a finger gun-based "threat"
- A seven-year-old suspended for bringing a "weapon" -- a pen that "buzzed" when touched -- to school
- A seven-year-old suspended for brandishing a "gun" he made by taking a strategic bite out of his Pop Tart
- A student suspended for taking a hand-drawn picture of a bomb to school with him [actual drawing posted below]
The school's only statement is that it had nothing to do with the arrest -- that the arrest was entirely law enforcement's decisions. But that assumes school administrators are incapable of exercising discretion. The arrest was made in the principal's office and a school resource officer recommended the student be arrested. No one in the office even attempted to prevent this from happening, apparently. What the SRO recommended is what happened and the school is now trying to distance itself from its complicity in this debacle.
Even assuming the anecdotal background is true, this arrest is still overkill.
A person familiar with a more detailed incident report spoke to The Star on condition of anonymity. The person said that during a class discussion, another student asked the girl, if she could kill five people in the class, who would they be? In response, the girl allegedly pointed her finger pistol — like the ones many children use playing cops and robbers.
This might make the incident a bit more disturbing, but it should not elevate it to the level of a crime -- especially not a felony. But that's what happened. The school may have felt compelled to accept the officer's arrest recommendation. The school may have felt bound by policy to pursue disciplinary action. But this is a 12-year-old surrounded by fully-functioning adults -- none of whom felt compelled to exercise their discretion or common sense. Finger guns on a schoolyard shouldn't result in felony charges. There's a lot of middle ground that no one's exploring and it's going to ruin the lives of students who have no idea their classroom jokes are running headlong into people who let their policies and protocols do all of their thinking for them.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: finger gun, kids, police, school police
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
PicardFacepalm.jpg
And they wonder why that clownworld meme just won't go away.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: floatingzoftoilet.jpg
“And they wonder why that clownworld meme just won't go away.”
Why are you still here bro?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So, they took the girls actions as a "true threat" under the Supreme Court's exception to free speech rights (or fighting words maybe). This seems like something they could just keep suing law enforcement for false arrest for. Those are obviously not true threats or fighting words.
The kid who drew the picture of the bomb has a REALLY great case against the officer/police station. They can't arrest people for distributing the anarchists cookbook or real atom bomb instructions unless the provider knows it will be used in an illegal act.
What a bunch of assholes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Well, yes I agree in part to absolutely what you say, but at 12 years old kids are fully aware of the tragic consequences of shootings today, especially keen on how uptight everyone is in schools also. This could be a wake up call for this young girl. This might be a positive action if she can make it one. To see the inside of a jail cell and to feel the sturdiness of the bars may very well convince her she does not want to go down that destructive road. I hope for her sake she can get a grip on something positive out of this experience.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Or it may convince her that she does want to go down that destructive road once she has access to a proper gun. It's sufficient to have 1% of those approached in that manner feel justified to escalate on an injust society to significantly increase the number of school shootings.
This is just not an age where you want to force contemplating life and death decisions on a child.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Which child? The 12 year old, or the supposed 'adults' that reacted so strangely?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Force contemplating life or death decisions on a child..
She is threatening her classmates chosing those life or death decisions already on her classmates! Someone needs to sit her in front of a large tv and show her about eight hours worth of murdered and tortured humans until she just can't stand herself. Like Malcom McDowell in the movie Clockwork Orange.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Good 'ol fashioned law 'n order, fire 'n brimstone, blah, blah.
Is it strange how we expect so much more out of our adolescent children than we do out of our elected officials,law enforcement, religious leaders?
Funny how most law 'n order types actually believe the law is enforced equally, and if you can't do the time don't do the crime and they probably think everyone in prison is guilty.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
"First fit" is a decent way to run a memory allocator, but it is certainly no way to run a cop shop!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
The truth is they don't care whether or not you are guilty. That is not in their job description.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
What in the FUCK are you smoking?
A wake up call????? The one who needs to be woken up is you. If you are truly that terrorized by someone pointing a finger at another, you may as well start screaming "alalalalalalalahhhhh!" because you have capitulated to the terrorists' every desire. You have implemented the very thing that Osama Bin Laden was hoping for not only in the 9/11 attacks, but also in his death. Congratulations, you sir are the reason the terrorists have won. You've made pointing a finger at someone a felony offense, and desire the stripping of a 12 year old's innocence through imprisonment, out of pure fear.
Seek help. You desperately need it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Easy Billy, the reason you can sit and accuse me of letting terrorists win when I was really hoping this 12 year old girl doesn't become one with support from idiots like you is because we still live in a free society in part because of people like me who joined the military to help keep America free. What have you done? You twist logic around in your demented brain and regurgitate it up for all the world to see. Bravo bravo.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
You are young, someday if you live long enough you may become wise, but I wouldn't hold my breath. It is a fact that the index finger was used to imitate a gun, but how does anyone know if she has access to firearms for one, and how seriously does she actually want to kill the people she pointed to and for what reason? It wasn't until she was questioned by the arresting officer that she was arrested. We don't have that conversation here. Apparently she was hostile enough with her answers, so he arrested her. Will it stick? Probably not. But maybe she needs the wake up call and that officer wasn't going to take a chance. You are not a very nice person to attack my character from what I wrote. So GO FUCK YOURSELF sounds like you won't have a problem Dick.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I don’t believe 12-year-olds should be arrested for expressing disturbing thoughts about wanting to kill her classmates or for being hostile to an officer. Period. If she had weapons on her, that would have been made public. Otherwise, any threat she posed was not immediate enough to justify an arrest. There were other options available that would not endanger others at the school and did not involve arresting a 12-year-old girl.
I also have my doubts about whether kids actually get “scared straight” by spending time in jail or juvenile detention.
Whatever fears there may have been about the kid, the only actions taken was pointing a finger gun. I don’t believe either that or any words spoken are sufficient to justify an arrest. That should be a last resort when dealing with children.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I read that she ended her "hit list" with herself. We can only pray that her parents get her help to cope with her feelings and whatever gave her reason to put those kids on a hit list, and then change her school. Arresting and charging this girl is only going to make her more likely to act out violently, whether it's towards others or herself. She needed compassion and she got handcuffs. It's plain wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
OR -- mad idea -- she might just have been playing a rather macabre game, and not intended any harm to anyone at all. There's a reason why 'orrible murder shows dissecting the killer(s) are popular.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I would agree that it was just a shade darker than typical twisted talk of preteens if she didn't supposedly end it with herself, that's what I find worrying. Otherwise, a simple conversation with the child to explain that such games can be frightening to other kids and misconstrued as threatening by others not in on the game would be sufficient. And I don't see any harm in the adults taking a moment to check in the girl and give her an ear or a shoulder if she needs it. Those preteen and early teen years are tough.
Oh, and those damn school resource officers need to go. They are just cops by another name and like dog shit, stink just the same.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Good points, well made. Mind you, it's possible that she naively thought that pretending to end the pretend massacre with herself was just an effort at being fair and equal. After all, she pretended to kill her classmates, that would have made them wonder if she actually liked them. By pretending to kill herself as well, it's possible she meant to indicate that she felt she would deserve death too if she really did such a thing. Kid logic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
The whole thing is meaningless without context, anyway. Why did the other student ask her that question to begin with? What was the tone of the question and what was it in response to? Nobody can say anything about what the action signifies without knowing what prompted the question she was answering.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
True. We can only speculate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
She is past the point of needing compassion. There is something wrong with her. Hopefully someone will get to the root of her anger. Too many people are lollycoddling their kids today. It does not prepare them for harsh reality.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
It’s not past the point of needing compassion until someone actually gets hurt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
not obviously true threats?? That seems like you don't know. If someone did that to me in school at a young age, I would have beat the shit out of him after school.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Saying that, if you had a gun and were to kill someone with a gun, you would kill these specific classmates, is not a true threat if the kid did not have a firearm on her person or on school grounds. Also, it’s not a “true threat” when the victim of the violence is the speaker. The fact that, if you were twelve and were one of the people this girl indicated as a potential target, you would beat her up, doesn’t make her words or actions any more of an obviously true threat.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
No I wouldn't beat her up, there would have been someone there to do that. If you are going to make threats like that, you can expect immediate backlash. Its not this pussified generation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Again, how does that make what she said an “obviously true threat” or an arrestable offense?
While I do find the idea that you (or someone else) would beat her up disturbing, I wasn’t actually criticizing you for saying that; only that it doesn’t refute the point the other person was trying to make like you suggested. How other kids would respond is not part of the “true threat” analysis, and we don’t throw people in jail for saying things that provoke retaliation because of the retaliation.
We aren’t talking about how kids would or should respond to such a threat but how adults should. I could see disciplinary measures like suspension, talking with the parents, or mandatory counseling, but an arrest seems rather excessive.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
She will now be filtered through the system where her parent or parents are also filtered through and definitely warned if nothing else about why adults have to take all potential threats seriously, especially in a school setting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
You’re completely missing my point here. Let’s recap.
Someone said that this 12-year-old girl’s words and actions don’t constitute an “obviously true threat” in the legal sense.
You responded to that with incredulity, saying that if you were one of the kids threatened, you would “beat the shit out of him after school.” (sic)
I have no idea how what you said has any bearing on the thing you were responding to, so I ask you to clarify.
You respond by saying that, no, you wouldn’t beat her up, but someone would.
I note that that doesn’t actually answer my question, and ask for you to explain what that has to do with whether what the girl did and said constituted an “obviously true threat”. I also note that the topic isn’t about how kids respond but how the adults did or should respond.
You are now explaining how being arrested will teach the girl and/or her parents about how what she did was wrong and why it was taken seriously.
You still haven’t answered the question I actually asked here: why does it matter if other kids will beat up the girl for threatening her when the discussion is about whether or not an arrest is appropriate, specifically by talking about whether or not what she said and did constituted an “obviously true threat” in a legal sense.
To be clear, for the purposes of this particular conversation, I am not asking you to explain why an arrest was appropriate here or what it’s supposed to accomplish. I already do that in several other parts of the thread. I’m also not asking you to explain why beating the girl up would be justified or inevitable. Here, I specifically want you to explain the relevance of the comment about kids beating up someone who threatened them to the comment about the “obviously true threat” analysis which you were responding to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
obviously true threat
Apparently it is within the arresting officer's discretion to determine if she intended to carry out her fingergun play. I said if someone back in the day before all the current lollycodding of this generation had someone threatened me like that, I would have beat the shit out of him. I then said someone would have beat the crap out of a girl who threatened us in class like that. I have never hit a girl in my life, though I have been accused once. People have to be aware of the consequences of their actions before they act. Otherwise they will have to live with the sometime harsh reality that not everyone is going to see things the same way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
And we’re saying he failed to properly exercise that discretion, and that, constitutionally speaking, he did not have the proper probable cause to believe this was a “true threat” that can be used to justify an arrest. What is your opinion?
Again, none of that is relevant at all. What point is that supposed to prove?
Also, is it lollycoddling to want to avoid having kids commit or be victims of violence? Or to care about their mental health in ways that previous generations didn’t know were even problems?
For that matter, when you were a kid, did kids at your school get arrested for threats?
I never said you did, nor did I ask you if you had. You did express an interest in doing so in a hypothetical situation where both you and the girl are the same age, which as an advocate for nonviolent solutions I have a problem with, but I never suggested you actually had.
Sure. However, when it comes to an authority figure enforcing a consequence, especially under color of law, the consequence should be proportional to the seriousness of the offense and the age/maturity of the offender. That’s very different from how the offenders’ peers will likely react on their own to such an offense.
If this was supposed to be the reason why you brought up 12-year-olds beating each other up for threatening them, I’m afraid that doesn’t add any relevance to your story.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I can't help but crack up at adults who make negative claims about the younger generations. On one hand you have people claiming the kids are so much worse and dangerous today. Really, when hazing freshmen involved whipping them with paddles and different forms of public humiliation just a generation or two before mine. ( I'm 38, but considered a millennial; I reject that and call myself and those born before 1990 generation Y because we don't have the millennial experience). And because there are claims that kids are so bad nowadays, we stick cops in schools, even at elementary level. We create zero tolerance policies that don't allow for discretion when a little kid brings a knife to cut their birthday cake even when they hand it directly over to their teacher. Or a kid brings some Advil to school and keeps it in their bag instead of handing it over to the nurse like they are incapable of taking it without supervision. Kids can't even exclude a another kid, even if there is good reason, like the kid is a bully, because that makes them the bully and there is zero tolerance for that.
And then after we demand constant supervision, refuse to allow kids (or parents and teachers) some leeway for their own discretion, disallow them from making independent decisions, outlaw anything that one could imagine is some how dangerous or a distraction- like lip balm or sun block or butter knives, or open toed shoes, which have zero tolerance consequences, and then we claim these younger generations are just snowflakes with no sense of the real world. Which is it? Are they dangerous thugs or helpless babies?
And let's not forget how expectations of parents have changed. When stay at home moms began entering the workforce and divorce became more acceptable, we started trying to frighten them into the traditional roles with stranger danger; you couldn't take your eye of your children for even a second because killers were lurking around every corner. But don't dare think it's ok to collect welfare so that you can provide your kids with proper supervision. Stay in an abusive marriage for the kids, but your a bad mother for letting those kids witness or experience the abuse. Whenever a kid gets in trouble, we all want to know where were the parents, the parents don't pay any attention and leave kids to be babysat by the TV. Then it's oh no, the parents are hovering of their kids and coddling them from the real world. Make up your mind. .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
So you would respond to pretend violence with real violence, that makes you the the person who would actually resort to violence over hurt feelings.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Every time you call the cops, expect an arrest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Not true.
Often you can instead expect the cop to murder someone because they were "afraid for thier safety" from 12 year old girls with finger guns.
Best to view cops as equivalent to the crips or bloods, but without any legal ramifications when they break the law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shouldn't a finger gun be covered by the 2nd Amendment?
I mean, just imagine a well-regulated militia of Americans wielding finger guns to strike fear into the Russians and make them afraid of meddling with elections.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Shouldn't a finger gun be covered by the 2nd Amendment?
When it's a crime to make finger-guns, only criminals will make finger-guns.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Shouldn't a finger gun be covered by the 2nd Amendment?
They are turning us all into criminals, see?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Shouldn't a finger gun be covered by the 2nd Amendment?
EVERYONE HOPES AND prays their children will be born with fingerguns! One on each hand.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Shouldn't a finger gun be covered by the 2nd Amendment?
Well, it's certainly true that if we lose the right to bear arms, we won't be able to wield finger guns anymore. When the arms come off, the hands and fingers go with them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Shouldn't a finger gun be covered by the 2nd Amendment?
"Well, it's certainly true that if we lose the right to bear arms, we won't be able to wield finger guns anymore."
Somewhat irrelevant. According to the OP having fingers in school is already skirting the legal boundary.
It's just a matter of time before trigger-happy cops gun down the first pedestrian they see pointing his index finger at another.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Shouldn't a finger gun be covered by the 2nd Amendme
Only thing that stops a bad guy with a finger is a good guy with a finger.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Shouldn't a finger gun be covered by the 2nd Ame
Which is better? A BIG Finger or a Straight Finger?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Shouldn't a finger gun be covered by the 2nd Ame
So where was the good guy with a finger gun? Why couldn't he have stopped this tragedy before it escalated?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Shouldn't a finger gun be covered by the 2nd Amendme
I was going to mark this as funny, but sadly it's actually insightful, not funny. We have police gunning down people holding video game controllers and cell phones, so finger guns are closer than you might think.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Shouldn't a finger gun be covered by the 2nd Ame
Well, I am confident that there is the possibility of someone having surgery to implant a gun within one of their fingers. Better just shoot everyone first and look at fingers later. This could lead to the planting of fingers on the perp, especially ones who have lost a finger or two.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Shouldn't a finger gun be covered by the 2nd
More likely a new trend in gun tattoos on the back of the hand incorporating the index finger as a barrel!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Shouldn't a finger gun be covered by the 2nd Amendme
Well, isn't it constitutionally legal to point the middle finger at cops? It is probably a good idea to keep your index finger holstered until we can get a SCOTUS ruling!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Shouldn't a finger gun be covered by the 2nd Ame
I certainly would not pull it out at a Trump rally. You will almost certainly be shot by Secret Service.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Shouldn't a finger gun be covered by the 2nd
At Trump rallies, I think most attendees keep their finger guns safely in their nasal holsters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Shouldn't a finger gun be covered by the
Yuk yuk!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Shouldn't a finger gun be covered by the 2nd Ame
I am not aware that SCOTUS has anything going on at the moment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Shouldn't a finger gun be covered by the 2nd Amendment?
So if they come for our guns, we should not give them the finger?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Shouldn't a finger gun be covered by the 2nd Amendment?
Great, I'll need a conceal carry permit just to walk around with my hands in my pocket.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Proof needed, but I won't hold my breath.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good Grief, I don't care what your political affiliation is, can we all agree that this is ridiculous? How do normal intelligent adults let this happen? It is a bit creepy, I give you that, but this is clearly something that the school counselor and the child's parents should be handling not the fucking police.
The police, the prosecutor, the school, everyone involved should be ashamed of themselves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
how is it creepy?
It's a 12 year old. children do shit like like this all the time. If people reacted this way to the antics of children when i was a kid we would have had class in prison yards.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I think it's a little creepy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Back then before all the intentional hysteria from doj and government, it was 'get this kind of crap out of your system before you turn eighteen!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"But this is a 12-year-old surrounded by fully-functioning adults -- none of whom felt compelled to exercise their discretion or common sense."
I dare say it's the opposite - they were compelled not to use it. Usually at the root of these kinds of events is that administrators have decided to put in zero tolerance policies to fend off the risk of lawsuits. Zero tolerance = zero thought, and someone daring to use common sense might find their job at risk.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The problem with that is that Zero Tolerance Policies virtually guarantee you'll be hit with a lawsuit sooner or later. This arrest will certainly result in one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The lawsuit will target the school, not any of the individuals following school policy to the letter and thus not having to defend themselves in court. The teacher that does not employ school policy is the one that is getting sued personally and/or removed from their job when a school shooting happens. The courts will not likely convict the teacher, but the court system in the U.S. does not really care whether you win or lose unless you are rich: you'll be bankrupted either way.
Taking the least amount of personal rather than institutional responsibility is a tremendous financial risk in the U.S.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Usually the lawsuit targets everyone involved, but some people get off because they were only following orders. Apparently that makes it okay.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
What was the line on King of the Hill? Something like "It's zero tolerance, Hank. If we show even a little bit of tolerance, then we can't call it zero tolerance."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thanks for proving (yet again) how stupid our government is. The problem is that anyone smart enough to be in government is too smart to want to be in government. This leaves us with idiots.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"The problem is that anyone smart enough to be in government is too smart to want to be in government. This leaves us with idiots."
Plato.
It's somehow very disheartening that a 2500 year old greek philosopher still reads as if he's describing the world of 2020.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And criminals! Don't forget the criminals. Government work is one of the best places to be a criminal in modern society.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
problem is anyone intelligent enough to be in government is too smart to want to be in government.. That is the very heart of the matter! And we entrust our once beautiful nation to these losers!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I would be more concerned that when asked which five people in the class she pointed at herself also. To me, that is a bigger red flag. Maybe a school counselor could intervene before any arrest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I was thinking the same thing. What the hell was the teacher thinking when they allowed that question to be asked? What was done to discipline the student asking that question, I mean what the hell was that discussion about that made that question pertinent? What was done to the teacher who allowed that question to be answered?
Then, there is the potential for the epitome of the Reasonably Scared Cop Rule, where the cop appears to have thought that the 'finger gun' might be used on themselves. 'I gots to get home for dinner tonight and no 'finger gun' wielding 12 year old is gonna prevent that!'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Its pretty safe assumption to see the cop believed the girl has some real issues and filtering her through the system would bring everyone to the table to disscuss her welfare.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If the police are smart, they will completely debrief this girl with why it is so terrible as to what she did and all the ramifications. Because it really looks as though the school is failing in their ability to reach this person.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Bro for the last time she’s 12.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
You seem to think 12 year olds don't have access to every seedy, dirty, horrible, mentally sick and deranged act on video, on tv and in books. How is she being raised could be a factor as well. Maybe she gets beat at home and doesn't give a shit anymore. Whats this "oh but she's just a twelve year old kid" crap? 12 year olds have a way of turning into 15 year olds and some pretty sick and horrifying acts have come from some kids. These people at the school just aren't taking any kind of risk.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Quite frankly, I don’t have an inherent problem with what the 12-year-old did. I don’t see what’s so terrible about it. I don’t understand what “ramifications” could come from it. I highly doubt it was anything but pure bluster or a game for her. And if that’s the case, it shouldn’t be treated like such a big deal.
Also, given the actions of this police officer, you’ll have to forgive me if I don’t expect the police to be smart.
We don’t have any indication of this kid’s past displinary problems, if any, so for all we know, this could be her first offense. As such, I have no reason to blame the school for “failing to reach her” if they had no reason to give her particular attention.
I don’t know about every one, but I absolutely believe that 12-year-olds have access to a lot of horrific things in videos or books. I also believe that kids are able to separate fiction from reality, and that merely seeing horrible things on TV or reading about them in books has any substantial likelihood of having any observable effect on their behavior. I base this belief on a number of studies into this sort of thing.
Also, I have no particular reason to believe that this girl had access to such things.
Oh, absolutely. I’ve known a lot of kids who acted out in school because of problems at home like that. I fail to see how that could justify an arrest, though.
Believe it or not, but most people don’t treat 12-year-olds the same way they do 15-year-olds. We don’t expect them to have the same level of maturity, responsibility, or experience, and so we modify our expectations and level of punishment for them accordingly. Furthermore, excessive punishment of a kid can be counterproductive or traumatizing for them, so we need to be extra careful to make the punishment scale with the seriousness of the crime as well as the age of the perpetrator.
But until then, they are not 15-year-olds, and we should not treat them like they are 15-year-olds. While they are 12-year-olds, they are 12-year-olds, and they should be treated like 12-year-olds. Actions they take at 12 may not reflect how they will act at 15, and we certainly should discipline them for what may happen three years later.
Absolutely. I just don’t think this is that high on the sick-and-horrifying scale, or that an arrest was an appropriate response to it.
And in doing so, they could be traumatizing kids unnecessarily. I’m sorry, but what you’re saying just doesn’t justify what the school did. I could see them enacting some sort of discipline, but an arrest was too far.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I boarded a jet for Florida once but passing through security they saw that I had a little 1"x 2" hand gun toy attached to my keychain. They all freaked and grabbed it away from me as another stood and pressed his palm against my chest until they had confiscated the toy gun. Its no joke to them in any degree. That was a new one on me. Since then, I am never surprised when something like this happens. They will make that young girl cry if they can. And she will probably get scolded in court by a sympathetic judge. The cops may look into the situation with her home life and investigate the parents. Expect it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Hell, I used to get paddled by teachers and faculty from my first day of kindergarten on through high school almost every week for stupid things. I could have owned that city now adays with a ballsy team of lawyers. That school is all concerned that this doesn't turn into something far worse than finger pointing. Turning this over to the discretion of the police is a win win for them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
She didn't just point to the classmates and herself when asked who she would kill if she could, she turned her hand into the fingergun, imitating a firearm, and pretends to shoot each classmate and then herself in a mock mass murder suicide. That is a little more troubling than just answering the stupid question. She has probably seen it acted out on tv a thousand times. She is only twelve. That is a sad testament to our society today.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
That's one interpretation. There are many others, and we don't have enough information to say what's the right one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Maybe it is a sad commentary on our society, but how does that justify an arrest?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
If the police are smart, they will completely debrief this girl with why it is so terrible as to what she did and all the ramifications.
But what about her second amendment rights?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Kids have a way of spiraling out of control these days, being under a lot of pressure from a world gone crazy, faster than you can speed home from work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
BOO!
Halloween is coming, be afraid, very afraid.
Out of controll kids coming to your door in the scary darkness under pressure to get as many treats as they can so they can boast ASAP online to show who is the best.
Is that bloodied axe real? The zombies are real & they can't be stopped :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Figurative threats become real lawsuits
If my child was arrested over a figurative action like finger guns, I would literally be able to finance the school system with the settlement they would be forced to give us for violated our rights and not acting as the parent when a parent isn't present. The "officer" would never be allowed to arrest another person since their job would now be guarding the local unemployment office since he lost immunity for arresting someone over a none crime
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Figurative threats become real lawsuits
Warning: internet tough guy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Figurative threats become real lawsuits
Hey! Don't be pointing that finger at me!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Figurative threats become real lawsuits
I think most people here are missing the bigger picture and that is that she was arrested and not shot. No one knows if she has access to firearms or not. And to use her finger in such an irresponsible way to threaten her classmates with murder/ suicide, she needs to be rigorously educated that that shit won't fly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Figurative threats become real lawsuits
That rather sounds like reckless endangerment. The officer failing to shoot a clearly deranged person that could have finger-gunned the whole department has probably been placed under supervision.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Figurative threats become real lawsuits
Kids being picked on repeatedly in school have come back to school armed and firing at will. Remember, "I don't like Mondays shooter?"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Figurative threats become real lawsuits
Okay. Good on the police for not shooting a 12-year-old armed only with a finger gun. Seriously, though, we know that the kid was arrested and not shot. We just think that an arrest was itself excessive and potentially damaging for the kid’s mental well-being.
If she had them on school grounds, then that absolutely would’ve been disclosed to the public. If she had access to them from outside the school, then the parents should be consulted and the girl should be clearly told not to play with guns, but that still doesn’t justify an arrest.
Again, coming from a 12-year-old, I wouldn’t take it that seriously if she did not actually have the means right there to execute on her threats. Also, I’m not expecting a 12-year-old to use her finger responsibly.
Absolutely. She should be told that what she did was wrong. Maybe even some counseling or discipline. An arrest, though, is too much.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Figurative threats become real lawsuits
We don't know anything about this 12 year old girl other than what we've read in this story. Maybe she is a bully or maybe the class clown. We can deduce that at least four classmates have crossed her somehow enough to be placed on a hypothetical hitlist by her answer if she could shoot them who would they be. And lastly she aims at herself. That is a telling tragic tale of something way out of wack with this girl. Don't protect her in a way that could prevent her from getting help.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Figurative threats become real lawsuits
A jury will most likely side with the arresting officer in this case. They would not want their kid to be traumatized by someone threatening them like this. So you may have to get your money the old fashion way.. EARN IT.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Figurative threats become real lawsuits
FTFY
(why doesn't the site support strikethrough?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Figurative threats become real lawsuits
I guess the old commercial was before your time!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Figurative threats become real lawsuits
I remember that commercial just fine. I marked his post as funny. But I felt I had to mod it to be more accurate. But it reminds me of another old spoof on those ads, where the old fashioned way is to steal it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Figurative threats become real lawsuits
That's funny, steal it! So true!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Figurative threats become real lawsuits
Somebody came up with this "markdown" stuff. It does not support real quotes or decent mark-up, but someone invented their own triangular wheel and views it as better than the standard round wheels.
The triangular wheel guy managed to reach the site owners on a good (for him) / bad (for everyone else) day and made a sale. Once that is done, site management is likely reluctant to admit mistakes.
This triangular wheel is better than those old-fashioned round wheels because it packs better.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Figurative threats become real lawsuits
Markdown is easier to type and doesn't leave the site users vulnerable to scripting attacks. If they implemented markdown properly, then HTML code and java-script entered from a site commenter won't run on other users machine when they load the website.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Figurative threats become real lawsuits
It’d still be nice if 1) bold and italics in block quotes and 2) strikethrough were supported.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Figurative threats become real lawsuits
John Housman I believe.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Figurative threats become real lawsuits
But enough about the cops arresting her..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You look at the world today and wonder what the heck has happened to it. Here is a fine example of why it's so messed up. You have snowflakes that the slightest improper phrasing means offense. Wonder where all that came from with the fine examples they get at home and at school.
I see no better way to wreck a young life than to do something like this. It's stupid on the face of it. No one seems to have an inkling of what common sense is.
Sadly missing in all this, is the free range kid. The ability to go out make a mistake and learn from it. Here what the kid learns isn't going to be good. Worse it will be a life time thing this child will carry with her the rest of her life.
The crime here rests with the adults.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You have it all wrong. She may learn a great deal of positive applications she may take home with this. I was four years old when my Uncle Johnny told me to draw my cap gun from my cowboy holster on a cop sitting next to him in a dark tavern. "Stick em up," I hollered. To which came the reply as he pulled his gun out and shouted, "You stick em up!" scaring the b'jeezus out of me and sent me crying out of that joint!
I haven't ever used a gun unlawfully or committed any crime since that day.. I am happy to say.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
So this is your excuse for being a bootlicker?
You think good things come from being frightened and abused by authority? That kids learn positive lessons from juvenile detention centers and therefore many never return? That this child will think the teachers, principal, and other staff give a shit about her interests and she should trust them if she feels she is in crisis? You are a moron. And a bootlicker.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
^This. I'm with the Free Range Kid guy, being that I was a free range kid. I went out, made mistakes, and "killed" all my schoolmates with my trusty finger gun over and over again. I did not grow up to be a sociopathic spree killer.
I'm a sensible shoes and trousers, no makeup kind of woman who is gainfully employed and stays out of trouble.
Do any of the "Teach 'em a lesson" types here in the comments wonder how it was that I'm a functioning, working person with a clean record? Let's stop getting over-excited about kids being a bit nasty when they play; we were all like that when we were young.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I worked for all my life give or take and where'd it git me? Commenting about losers at Techdirt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
thanks for calling me a moron. catress? techdirt aught to censor people who attack the good spirited hopeful people who don't want such kind of harm to come to us big kids.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
If people don't have a Masters degree, they should have to wait to post their sophmoric comments until we who do are finished commenting!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
We got a masters degree over here everyone, watch out.
Dude if you are going to act like a prideful jerk, here's your door.
| |\
| | \
|__ | |
|
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Now I wish I had used plain text. Lol.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Did you learn that in first grade? How about a C-?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
You did use plain text.. you got me good. I appreciate it. Techdirt feels better than flagellating with my roofing nailer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I’m so sorry! I had no idea you had a Master’s degree in commenting! I also had no idea you weren’t finished commenting! You absolutely shouldn’t have to put up with such sophomoric comments until the you’ve finished writing, and the rest of us who may only have a mere Bachelor’s degree should just shut up and wait for you to finish.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Thank you. Maybe I was premature to judge you. Nah..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I’m just saying that of all the arguments and complaints you could have had, that was not a good one. If you’re rude and absurd, you’ll get snark.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Oh yes. I’m absolutely traumatized from that time someone shot me with a finger gun.
And being called a moron is such a horrible insult! I hope your feelings weren’t hurt too bad. Do you need a Band-Aid for your wounded pride?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I just have to stop laughing long enough to scratch my ass.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
No band-aid, but it is disappointing to see the level of intellect drop beneath that of a fifth grade game of killball hurling derogatory defamatory screams in what I thought was a truly significant and bright technical forum. It just does not feel like the brightest minds have shown up when all the horrible insults start flying around. No respect here. And I feel a certain amount of sympathy for the staff and writers who have to constantly babysit
the brouhaha.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Weren't you calling us, or specifically me, "losers" a few lines up? And just because you're insults in this comment weren't directed to a particular person doesn't make it any less the insulting commentary that you are whining about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
That's not how Techdirt's comment policy works, and you aren't being good spirited. But you are right that I should not attack the person, but rather the ideas. I apologise for the name calling. However, your ideas are moronic and cast the obviously corrupt police system in an undeserved heroic light. You are advocating for the permanent psychological damage of a child by forcing her to face the consequences designed for adults who commit crimes which actually hurt another person, all because she exercised her first amendment right in a way that you don't like. And you repeatedly argue that this is not just an acceptable way to treat a child, but that it's the appropriate way to treat a child, supporting your argument with a claim that abusive authority figures didn't do you any permanent harm and in fact, straightened you out. That's not just a poor argument, but it's statistically unsupported. Having a master's degree or a doctorate doesn't make your argument any less moronic. And advocating for the full power of the state, the militarized police, to swoop in and arrest a child for what amounts to speech you don't like and finger pointing is the kind of thing a bootlicker says.
There are effective ways to respond to questionable behavior, or even violent behavior, in children that don't include bringing armed guards to terrorize them. As a 30+ year old adult I had to present myself to be arrested and wasn't handcuffed nor did I have to wait in a holding cell; that experience was so frightening and upsetting that a significant amount of my hair started coming in grey. (Long story short, I went to the police for help, instead of investigating my complaint they interrogated me and coerced me into saying I lied. I didn't do anything wrong, the only lie I told was the one they coerced me into. I fought back and got the prosecutor to drop the case) I can't imagine what that would have done to me as a child. And for the adults that I trusted to simply wash their hands of me, that would have easily triggered a lot of self destructive behavior. I don't know if this girl is a goodie goodie like I was, or a defiant troublemaker. But girls and boys are socialized differently; boys will be boys, but girls who violate social norms are marked forever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Your longwindedness precedes you. I don't like you and won't read your blather. So save it honey. You don't matter.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Seriously?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
When you ARE abused and frightened by authority sometimes repeatedly, you can make any choice you want, but if you still love life and respect it, you don't have to be bootlickers because you choose to keep on keeping on the best way you know to. Once you get a few scars from the roadrash, you will understand that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Go fuck yourself by the way asshole.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Common sense
This is invoked so many times yet each and every time the writer gets it wrong.
For the cops and school administrators this IS common sense.
One should never ever assume that common sense is the same as good sense.
There is a difference and this is a good example of one not being the other.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Common sense
From the dictionary:
So, no, they are not practicing common sense.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Common sense
Sorry but that wasn't "common sense" ... not by definition anyways. "Good sense and sound judgement" doesn't describe those actions.
com·mon sense
/ˌkämən ˈsens/
noun
noun: common sense; noun: commonsense; modifier noun: common-sense
good sense and sound judgment in practical matters. "a common-sense approach" synonyms: good sense, sense, sensibleness, native wit, native intelligence, mother wit, wit, judgment, sound judgment, level-headedness, prudence, discernment, acumen, sharpness, sharp-wittedness, canniness, astuteness, shrewdness, judiciousness, wisdom, insight, intuition, intuitiveness, perceptiveness, perspicacity, vision, understanding, intelligence, reason, powers of reasoning;[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Common sense
Jurisprudence is going to win every time over this common sense definition.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The pendulum
The pendulum swinging too far the other way in reaction to violence in schools. Back when I was in school, we all would have gone to jail if this was how things were handled.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The pendulum
Ain't that the truth. Just one verse of "On Top of Spaghetti" would get you tried as an adult, and one verse of "Glory Glory Hallelujah" would have the in-school cop gunning you down where you stood.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The pendulum
Don't forget "row row row your boat" where you toss your teacher overboard.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe someone who understands the law better than I do (which is probably most of you) could explain this to me. She was interrogated by a police officer and on the basis of what she said, arrested. Aren't parents supposed to be present? Was she read her Miranda rights first?
And couldn't a no to either of those questions pierce the officer's qualified immunity?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
They don't have to read you Miranda rights, just get you to sign a paper that waives your rights
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Not quite. The waiver cannot be offered until after they read you your rights.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
They don't have to read Miranda rights any more.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The police state
This is more training, the future population must be trained from a young age to accept the presence and compliance with the DHS imposed police state. Total lockdown and constitution abandonment is only about 20 minutes in the future.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I wonder ... do I need a concealed carry permit before putting my hands in my pockets?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
In Arizona you can have only five dildos in your possession. If you are caught playing with a sixth, presumably from your pants pocket, you could get busted! I got the first part of that off a Frank Zappa cd. 🤩
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
iirc, those are illegal in Louisiana
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The girl chose herself as the last person to kill if she could. In a non-dysfunctional country she could have received psychological care. But this is 'Murica.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Murica goes the extra mile. She received psychopathological care.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Who would I rather marry? A psychopath or a pathological liar? Hmm.. I'm still thinking.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
If she had pointed to herself first, and then her classmates, would anyone have taken her serious?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Ninja, it's unlikely that she needs psychological care. She was probably just messing around. Good grief, why is everyone having a meltdown over this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is a 12-year-old's signature valid for anything?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
finger pointing
This is the most absurd thing I can imagine. Adults making such poor decisions are teaching our children. They need to get rid of these automatons who have been programmed to make kids lives miserable.
Seems the first thing they need to prove is that children were taught that this was not allowed in school, and have a class hour by a teacher to explain to all the kids, and have the kids sign a document that they have been told there is a limit to having fun. We used to love cowboy movies when I was a kid, and kids had toy guns they wore on belts, and no one got shot. Toy guns would be illegal there.
I do not especially like guns but they do serve a purpose and many people depend on them for their safety. That said any picture on paper or a motion with a hand should not even be a crime, let alone a felony.
The school needs to prove that they have instructed the kids what is not allowed before they can call the cops and not get prosecuted because this is malicious. These people do not like children, and lack common sense. Replace them. Cops are not needed in schools. We are becoming a over control fascist country and people need to start speaking out as this is gonna get a whole lot worse. Remember prisons make profits adn courts adn cops get rewards for convictions. Court have their own bank number with Dunn adn Bradstreet and bonds are put together with the money from fines. The money is going to the IMF. It is profitable for them too for children to be put in foster homes making up small matters into a major case adn that is where 75% of the children in the sex trade come from, foster homes. Too dang much oversight, and control and over judgement. New psych diagnostic codes for "diagnoses for which have no test to support". It is subjective and an abuse of authority. Too many kis on psychotropics. Bring back recess.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: finger pointing
'Cops are not needed in schools.'
Welcome to the world where you will have to suffer freedoms lost because of a single idiot just like the rest of us have to. Especially when anything to do with guns are involved or potential threats neccessitates by someone's logic police intervention.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We home school our children on finger gun safety.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
No one taught this girl its not polite to point or maybe she disregarded it. But to pull out a finger gun and point.. that violates one rule in gun safety to "never point a gun at someone unless you intend to shoot." Maybe she will get educated in the slammer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Insanity
I find it instructive that a cop can literally film himself having sex with a 15 year old that be goes on to show to follow cops and friends and be aquitted of everything but the misdemeanor of official misconduct
https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/ny-cop-acquitted-of-sex-with-teenage-girl- 20191002-7cwx4o2s4jfv3p3cuc7b5azf2i-story.html
but a 12 year old with a finger gun is sent to jail and charged with a felony and there there is an idiot in this threat arguing that this will teach her a lesson. Given how many underage girls are raped by cops in custody, exactly what type of "lesson" does he expect this girl to learn?
What a disgusting country this has become.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Insanity
That's statutory rape! He should have gone to jail!
Lesson for Fingergun Girl: You live in an authoritarian regime. Conform.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Insanity
No one else seems to be teaching this girl what someone with a small brain should know by now. School shootings have made the entire world extremely nervous. The charges will most likely be dropped, and if anyone is paying attention to this episode, they will think before they do something SO FUCKING STUPID. Some of you techdirters are extremely rebellious against common sense and want to blame it on someone who knows better than to imitate a mass murder and suicide even with a simple God given index finger. Ok, ball's in your court!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Insanity
Again, this is a lesson that could have been taught without an arrest. Also, you’re assuming that a 12-year-old girl has common sense.
We’ve also been highly critical about some of the oversensitivity that has resulted from the nervousness over mass school shootings. How many 12-year-olds (give or take a year) have been responsible for mass shootings?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Insanity
Apparently, while it's perfectly fine to give grown ass men working firearms, put them in a group of like-minded jocks and tell them to escalate any confrontation, assure them that they can shoot unarmed citizens who appear at the window of the homes they live in... We're also behooved to police our twelve year olds and throw the book at them for pointing their index finger in a way that offends certain sensibilities.
We give adults every possible concession to excuse their poor judgement, refuse the same for our kids and expect them to be adults, then wonder why society is so fucked in the head.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Insanity
It is fucked in the head in part because the State thinks it owns our children. Centuries old doctrine of Parens Patriae..
https://libertarianinstitute.org/everything-will/the-perils-of-parens-patriae-or-when-the- state-becomes-daddy/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Insanity
Eight year old kids have murdered and maimed before. 12 year olds are definitely capable of horrible shit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Insanity
That is true, but this kid only pretended.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Insanity
We don't have the conversation she had with the arresting officer that got her arrested. We don't know 'the rest of the story.' Kids with bad attitudes suck.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Insanity
The story is that cops were called in the first place...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Insanity
"A guy in uniform who's given a gun and taught to escalate every possible situation and will escape serious punishment if something goes wrong, and comes with a bunch of buddies who will do the exact same thing... not threatening at all! But a kid with a bad attitude, fuck that noise and smash it with a hamma!"
Yeah, #copsuckerlogic is pretty fucked up...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Insanity
I don’t think her attitude would change anything. It really doesn’t matter how bad her attitude was; it doesn’t justify arresting a 12-year-old.
I would have understood detention, suspension, calling the parents, mandatory counseling, or some other disciplinary measure by the school. I don’t see why a cop had to get involved at the start, and I certainly don’t understand why an arrest was necessary.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Insanity
Sure, but they are incredibly rare, and we have no reason to believe that to be the case here. There were other ways the school could have handled a potential threat like this, including counseling or a call to the parents. I’m just not sure that an arrest was the proper response. If no one was actually harmed, and the girl was not armed right then, which would make the threat imminent, I don’t understand why an arrest was necessary.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Insanity
Arresting someone is a form of state violence whether they are ultimately charged or not. Before the State commits violence against 12 year old girls, they better have a damn good excuse beyond "she pointed her finger gun at someone!"
Your pandering to police brutality is exactly why people increasingly don't trust our out of control police Barney Fife driven police force.
Ironically, if the resource officer (cop) had pulled out his gun and returned real fire to match her imaginary bullets, thus killing her, they would likely get off under qualified immunity.
Meanwhile, guys like you would be calling the little girls police execution "a valuable lesson for other 12 year old girls with finger guns."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Insanity
You are an extremist. You have a completely soured vision. Cops don't always get it wrong. The bad apples in the law enforcement field have turned the entire profession into shit. But there are a lot of good people who got into this with honest intentions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Insanity
Ya, I'm calling bullshit on the "a few bad apples" shtick.
Policing in America is a toxic environment that rewards sadists and sociopaths. It's irrelevant if "good people with honest intentions" go into law enforcement, which is an unproven assumption on your part. The culture rewards criminals and those who at a minimum turn a blind eye to all the criminality around them.
This is not even where someone starts. It's a simple rule of human nature that if you create positions with no oversight, not accountability and a monopoly on violence in any society, then the least evolved members of society will be drawn to that work and those who are not will be drummed out.
Police unions, cooperative prosecutors and judges, rules like qualified immunity guarantee you will create a culture of monsters and that is exactly what he have done as every police state before us has done.
This is a very incomplete list, but USA today has recently started pulling together reports of misconduct by police around the US and we are at 85,000 over the last decade alone. Mind you, reporting is optional and most police departments work hard to cover up police corruption within their department. The state of California law enforcement, which is LA shows literally no distinction between themselves and the gangs they cooperate with more than fight refuses to report at all.
It appears we have a situation where an awful lot of bad apples are ruining things for the small handful of cops we have out there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Insanity
Correction:
"It appears we have a situation where an awful lot of bad apples are ruining things for the small handful of honest cops we have out there."
https://news.yahoo.com/found-85-000-cops-ve-012000534.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Insanity
FTR, I don’t think the AC was saying there were only a few bad apples, and they seem to concede that, however many there are, they are ruining the entire profession for any good, honest cops there may be.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Insanity
" Cops don't always get it wrong. The bad apples in the law enforcement field have turned the entire profession into shit"
The saying is that bad apples spoil the whole barrel. It doesn't matter how many "good" cops there are, if they stay silent the whole barrel is rotten.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"But this is a 12-year-old surrounded by fully-functioning adults..."
Apparently not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]