Stone Brewing, One-Time Battlers Of 'Big Beer', Out Here Trying To Cancel Non-Confusing Trademarks

from the stone-cold dept

In the past few years, as the craft brewing industry exploded, it became something of a regular thing for us to write about one craft beer trademark dispute or another. The idea is that as the industry has grown, it's become corporatized. The once congenial atmosphere of the industry, one which saw breweries heavily borrow from one another, or skirt the line of potential confusion, devolved into suited lawyers arguing about beer brands. And if that doesn't make you sad, you simply have no soul.

Stone Brewing was once one of the smaller craft breweries out there and built a reputation for itself for taking on "big beer." That stance morphed in 2018 into a lawsuit against MillerCoors over the latter's rebranding of Keystone beer into "Stone" on its can labels.

In March 2020, a federal court rejected both sides’ motions for summary judgment and the case will now move to trial in October 2020. Stone Brewing is seeking to recover $1 billion in damages in regard to infringing sales. Coincidentally, in the lawsuit, MillerCoors argues that the San Diego-based craft brewery’s trademark of the word “stone” f is “conceptually weak because at least 10 other craft breweries actively use the word ‘Stone’ in their name."

And that pushback from MillerCoors appears to have been the catalyst for Stone morphing, just like its industry has, into one of corporate lawyering and aggressive trademark enforcement. Since March, it appears that Stone has gone hunting for other breweries that have been using the word "stone" in their names and, in several cases, is attempting to have that trademark cancelled.

First reported by Kindsey Bernhard of Kentucky Sports Radio, who uncovered a series of tweets stemming from Patrick Fannin of Dreaming Creek Brewery in Richmond, KY, Fannin explains that Stone Brewing has issued a trademark cancellation request against Sawstone Brewing for their use of the word “stone” in the brewery’s name. Stone Brewing first filed for their mark of the word in 1997.

Upon further investigation of the US Patent and Trademark Office, the Sawstone Brewing team discovered that Stone Brewing has also issued similar trademark cancellation requests in approximately 100 instances this year where entities have used the word “stone” or “bastard” in either their alcohol-related business or products. Stone Brewing is also the creator and trademark holder for Arrogant Bastard Ales.

And so here we are. The once-little-guy brewery that took on MillerCoors, and in some circles was applauded as a David taking on Goliath, is now just a Junior Goliath taking swats at all kinds of Davids.

And, as should be obvious, this sort of shotgun approach to trademark cancellation is complete horseshit. If Stone were so concerned and injured by these uses of the word "stone" by other breweries, or if there were any actual customer confusion to have here, why now? Where is the evidence of harm and confusion? If it exists, why hasn't Stone sued before?

Or, to take the least charitable view, is Stone simply going after its fellow craft breweries to bolster its seven-figure claims lawsuit against MillerCoors?

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: beer, brewing, stone, trademark
Companies: stone brewing


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    That One Guy (profile), 22 Jul 2020 @ 7:21pm

    How very fitting

    Stone Brewing is also the creator and trademark holder for Arrogant Bastard Ales.

    Well at least they've got one drink that perfectly suits their company's character and behavior.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2020 @ 4:08pm

      Re: How very fitting

      I would swear there was some Something Bastard Something Ale prior to theirs.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Aaron Walkhouse (profile), 23 Jul 2020 @ 3:30am

    Why hasn't Stone sued before?

    Umm… "One BILLION dollars!" ‌ ‌ (Muahahaaaah!) ‌ ‌ ; ]

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2020 @ 4:38am

    Sounds like "Stone" need a lesson in the perils of trademarking commonly-used words...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2020 @ 5:30am

    They should get laughed out of court over the Stone part.
    I can see "Stone Brewery" being trademarked but to take on anybody that just happens to have "stone" in the name is ridiculous.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Thad (profile), 23 Jul 2020 @ 7:49am

    I think changing Keystone to just Stone probably is a case of a big brewer trying to trade on confusion with a smaller but more-respected brand, and I'd have probably been on Stone Brewing's side if they'd just left it at going after MillerCoors.

    Going after smaller breweries with names that aren't confusing at all is where they lose me.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2020 @ 8:28am

    Don't love the use of AAVE in this title. It's kind of unnecessary and jarring to see on here, to be blunt.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Tanner Andrews (profile), 23 Jul 2020 @ 8:33am

    No Risk of Confusion

    There was little risk of confusion between Stone and Keystone. One made beer, the other made pale yellow fizzy water. I enjoy the Arrogant, but would not be much interested in the pale yellow fizzy water.

    Stone Brewing was just someone getting to the name first. The particular beers do stand out.

    If Keystone changed their name to Stone, then there is a clear infringement. Risk of confusion, dilution of a good brand with cheap fizzy fluid, and consumers being cheated will all be present.

    The Arrogant Bastard works well for a humble counsellor. I remember first encountering it out on the coast. It is good stuff on draft. I have also enjoyed the ``enjoy by'' series of beers.

    That said, as the kind of customer who would be interested in the Stone Brewing beers, I am very unlikely to be confused by Keystone, Sandstone, Sawstone, Soapstone, Limestone, Talcumstone, Whetstone, Rockmart, or See-Rock-City branding.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Mononymous Tim (profile), 23 Jul 2020 @ 9:06pm

    Risk of confusion?

    Another company calling their fans morons.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.