Unofficial Amiibo Guidebook That Was Essentially Advertising Nintendo Products Gets Nintendo'd

from the nintendon't dept

Nintendo really can't help itself. With the company's storied reputation for valuing strict control of all things intellectual property over literally everything else, we have detailed plenty of occasions where this restrictive attitude seems to work directly against the company actually selling things. From DMCAing fan-made ports of Nintendo's games to antiquated game systems, to getting fan-made expressions of Nintendo fandom taken down from 3rd party creation games like Dreams, to just DMCA carpet-bombing a wide range of fan-made games that serve as homages to Nintendo properties, the company has made it very clear that it will choose strict control over being good to its fans at every opportunity. Even, as is so often the case, when that means getting content taken down that essentially serves as an advertisement for Nintendo products.

Perhaps this has never been more evident than when Nintendo recently got a Kickstarter project shut down, as that project was for a guidebook to Nintendo Amiibo products.

Made by Ninty Media, the unofficial amiibo handbook was designed as a guidebook that catalogued every single amiibo available at the time of the book’s release. Not only does this compendium show off every amiibo, it also gives fun facts about each character listed, and even has estimated prices to help those trying to purchase these desired figures today. The Kickstarter for the book launched last month and has long surpassed its initial goal of £3,000 with £36,172 at the time of its being taken down.

However, that Kickstarter has now come to a halt thanks to this new dispute from Nintendo. Viewing the copyright notification on the Kickstarter page reveals that it is under dispute due to the use of the amiibo logo on the cover of the book, along with some of Nintendo’s other design marks. Paul Murphy, the man behind the amiibo handbook, along with other projects from Ninty Media, has posted on Twitter that he would respond shortly to this claim, demonstrating that the book isn’t cancelled yet. But he did offer refunds to anyone who contributed to the Kickstarter in the event that he loses the dispute.

Now, a couple of things I should stipulate right up front. First, Nintendo is well within its rights to take this action. Use of Nintendo's branding and imagery certainly runs afoul of copyright and trademark laws. Second, it was fairly silly of the makers of this book to use that branding and imagery, including font-types, without ever having reached out to Nintendo for any kind of approval. That would be the case if this were a book about the products of "Company X", but when it's Nintendo? C'mon, guys.

So, with those stipulations out of the way, we can now get into just how stupid this all is on Nintendo's part as well. First, again, Nintendo doesn't have to spit directly in the faces of its fans.

Given Nintendo’s history, it’s unsurprising that what have been dubbed by many as the “Nintendo Ninjas” are at it again. Similar to Nintendo’s past cases, it’s a dispute where Nintendo is legally in the right, but dubious in its morality. The more of these projects Nintendo cancels, the clearer the message that Nintendo is against these types of fan projects. It’s not a good message to send to the community, and it harms the relationship Nintendo has with its consumers.

And then let's add to all of that that this book would essentially serve as a giant advertisement for Nintendo's Amiibo products. There are a zillion ways the company could have worked amicably with this Kickstarter project so as to both protect its IP, say with a cheap or free license to use the assets in question, while also ensuring that a book for Amiibo enthusiasts still got released. By all accounts, such possibilities were never even explored by Nintendo.

That's not surprising any longer, but it remains quite disappointing. If we acknowledge that this book generally didn't serve any real threat to the monetary income of Nintendo, and likely would have been a boon instead, there was literally nothing to lose and everything to gain if Nintendo had chosen to be human and cool in this instance.

Instead, it takes a hit on the relationship front with its fans and loses out on the free advertising for Amiibo products. Great job.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: amiibo, copyright, trademark, unofficial amiibo handbook
Companies: kickstarter, nintendo, ninty media


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 20 May 2021 @ 9:03pm

    Thank you sir, may I have another?

    The problem isn't with Nintendo. It's the fans (a.k.a. consumers) who keep buying.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      That One Guy (profile), 20 May 2021 @ 9:32pm

      Re: Thank you sir, may I have another?

      It's both, if fans had even a shred of self-respect Nintendo would only be able to engage in such behavior for a short amount of time before it became a literal 'knock it off or go out of business' scenario, however that doesn't stop Nintendo from being responsible for their actions in showing such contempt.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    That One Guy (profile), 20 May 2021 @ 9:35pm

    Nintendo: 'Because We Hate You'

    Ah Nintendo, never letting an opportunity to show how much they enjoy slapping around their biggest fans pass them by, and in so doing reminding people on a regular basis why it's a good idea to avoid them.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Lee Litter, 20 May 2021 @ 9:37pm

    Your writing is atrociating.

    With the company's storied reputation

    "storied" implies false or exaggerated: you no doubt intended "famed", but your internal thesaurus is malapropped.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
      identicon
      Lee Litter, 20 May 2021 @ 9:38pm

      Re: Your writing is atrociating.

      for valuing strict control of all things intellectual property

      AH. Used too many words and accidentally admitted "intellectual property" is part of "all things", REAL and DEFINE-ABLE. -- Should have omitted "all things" for both better writing and in line with Techdirt's notions.

      over literally everything else, we have detailed plenty of

      "literally" is nearly always a bad choice. No one uses it correctly, not even me, and it's useless or wrong as an intensifier; definitely "literally" wrong when put with "everything", so you just falsified the whole sentence.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
      identicon
      Lee Litter, 20 May 2021 @ 9:38pm

      Re: Your writing is atrociating.

      occasions

      This usage is not right either, the word is best skipped, worn out; "times" would serve.

      where this restrictive attitude seems to work directly against the company actually selling things.

      AH AGAIN, since part of what Nintendo sells is "intellectual property", you again support the notion is an identifiable "thing".

      You falsify that last clause by listing items that are all "fan-made", which by definition aren't likely to be sales for Nintendo, definitely not "directly".

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
      identicon
      Lee Litter, 20 May 2021 @ 9:39pm

      Re: Your writing is atrociating.

      Later you toss in "stipulate" which you (like the once-verbose now-vanished "Gary") picked up from being around lawyers who don't know where to click, and think verbosity enhances your credibility. Here's the ACTUAL definition; to "stipulate" is not as you mis-use to set up an argument, but to SETTLE one:

      stipulate = vt. -lated, -lating 1. to include specifically in the terms of an agreement, contract, etc.; arrange definitely 2. to specify as an essential condition of or requisite in an agreement vi. to make a specific demand or arrangement (for something) as a condition of or requisite in an agreement

      I could go on about your illiteration (it's intentional nonce-word for humor, kids, like a couple above), but skip to pointing out that Nintendo is doing just fine without least attention to your whiny little attacks, and so I wonder WHY you do them? Does Masnick pay you enough to be worthwhile, or do you still think that "writing" here will result in exposure? -- If so, any editor will be put off by your errors, and you've even dropped the wild verbiage of prior years, so don't even provide hoots!

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Rocky, 21 May 2021 @ 12:47am

        Re: Re: Your writing is atrociating.

        It's amazing that you can rant about one word and how it's used wrongly while actually not knowing that you can use it as a transitive verb to concede for the purposes of an argument.

        You are one stupid fucker that has no better argument for attacking someone than the words they use. Are you regressing perhaps? Are diapers and drooling on the list of things for you in the near future?

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Stephen T. Stone (profile), 21 May 2021 @ 4:18am

          Brainy, having run out of actual arguments or facsimiles thereof, has resorted to mocking words and letters that other people use. He attacked me as being “un-American” or some shit because I use vowels with diaresises in words like “coöperate” instead of setting off the prefix with a dash (“co-operate”). It’s sad, is what it is.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 21 May 2021 @ 4:36am

            Re:

            It’s sad, is what it is.

            Yeah, but some times little it's funny to watch little creatures fail miserably.

            It's almost adorable how they've fallen to such petty comments... in the "haha... now throw that in the fire so the rest of us can get on with life" sort of way.

            link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Toom1275 (profile), 21 May 2021 @ 11:38am

          Re: Re: Re: Your writing is atrociating.

          It's not like Kitty Litter here has ever showed any level of literacy ever before.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 21 May 2021 @ 5:39am

        Re: Re:

        There once was an out of the blue
        Who hated the process of due
        Each post that he made
        Was DMCAed
        And shoved up his ass with a screw

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      wereisjessicahyde (profile), 20 May 2021 @ 11:57pm

      Re: Your writing is atrociating.

      storied: adjective. often spoken of or written about.

      Cambridge Dictionary

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      PatrickH, 21 May 2021 @ 12:38am

      Re: Your writing is atrociating.

      Malapropped, sorry but in world do stored and famed sound remotely the same? Also they're synonymous.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      nasch (profile), 21 May 2021 @ 10:51am

      Re: Your writing is atrociating.

      "storied" implies false or exaggerated

      storied: celebrated in or associated with stories or legends.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        PatrickH, 21 May 2021 @ 12:58pm

        Re: Re: Your writing is atrociating.

        It also means well known and has synonyms like notable, famous, and renowned.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    fairuse (profile), 20 May 2021 @ 10:17pm

    Grammar Nanny

    Run for youre life a Grammar Nanny is victims. Nintendo must be the new "name that does not get spoken".

    Alcohol and music next on a game channel near U.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Krolis (profile), 21 May 2021 @ 7:22am

    Coming next week the Official Amiibo Guidebook from Nintendo.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 21 May 2021 @ 8:50am

    They might want to protect their mark against claims they didn't.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Crafty Coyote, 21 May 2021 @ 9:20am

    NINTENDO is CONFUSED.

    It hurt itself in its confusion.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 21 May 2021 @ 9:33am

    nintendo do not understand fair use, they are more agressive about taking down video game videos than anyone else.
    they dont license content to fans.
    they are like the record companys before steve jobs invented the ipod,
    they want total control of all their ip.
    Even if it means they have to remove fan content and take down videos that act as free advertising for their games

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Christenson, 21 May 2021 @ 10:53am

    How *would* you use Nintendo TMs nominatively??

    Heya Tim:

    So suppose I want to write an illustrated guide like the one being discussed -- what would I need to do to make it clear that my guide was not from Nintendo, while showing pictures and other TM material? What about Copyrights on some of those character images?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    nasch (profile), 21 May 2021 @ 10:54am

    Copyright?

    Use of Nintendo's branding and imagery certainly runs afoul of copyright and trademark laws.

    Trademark, yes, but where's the copyright issue? And if there's no copyright issue, the DMCA does not apply.

    Description of copyrighted material: Brand design mark

    Description of infringing material: "The Campaign offers for sale its “Unofficial Amiibo Handbook,” which prominently displays Nintendo’s AMIIBO Design mark on the cover and also displays throughout the handbook Nintendo’s other design marks and elements of Nintendo’s AMIIBO Design mark"

    Is Nintendo's "brand design mark" even copyrighted? Or copyrightable?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 26 May 2021 @ 2:03am

    very helpfull post for me..https://provistechnologies.com/

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.