Cop Who Killed A Suicidal Man Less Than 11 Seconds After Entering His House Convicted Of Murder
from the officers-express-concern-over-disturbing-frequency-of-lightning-strikes dept
It's rare enough to see a law enforcement officer convicted of murder. It's even rarer to see it happen twice in one year.
In June, Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin was convicted of murdering George Floyd. Chauvin placed his knee on the neck of the unarmed, unresisting Floyd for more than nine minutes -- and for two minutes after another officer said he couldn't detect a pulse. For this brutal act -- one that prompted months of heated protests around the nation -- Chauvin was sentenced to twenty-two years in prison.
It has happened again. A Huntsville, Alabama police officer has been convicted on murder charges and sentenced to 25 years in prison.
William Ben Darby, the Huntsville police officer convicted of murder for shooting and killing Jeff Parker, was sentenced today to 25 years in prison.
[...]
A Madison County jury on May 7 found Darby guilty of murder for shooting and killing Parker, a 49-year-old man threatening suicide, three years ago.
Officer Darby was not the only officer to respond to the call about the suicidal man. He wasn't even the first to arrive. Officer Genisha Pegues was already there, trying to de-escalate the situation. The suicidal Parker had already told Pegues he had no interest in hurting her. He was holding a gun, but it was pointed at his own head.
Darby arrived, and within 30 seconds had retrieved a shotgun from his cruiser and killed Parker by shooting him in the face. Darby's entire interaction with the suicidal man consisted of him shouting four times for Parker to drop the gun and yelling at Officer Pegues to point her gun at Parker. All of this -- Darby's entry and his murder of Parker -- took only eleven seconds.
In another rarity, one of the witnesses testifying against Darby was Officer Pegues, who had the situation at least partially under control before Officer Darby burst into the house and decided the only way to help the suicidal man was to kill him.
Pegues, testifying for the prosecution, told the jury that she never felt threatened by Parker and that she didn’t need Darby to save her life. She testified that Parker told her he didn’t want to hurt her.
Robert Tuten, Darby’s lead defense attorney, went after Pegues.
Tuten asked whether Pegues put herself and other officers in danger by standing in front of an armed man with her gun pointed down, rather than at Parker.
“Dangerous is the job,” Pegues, who was a police officer for six years, replied. She said tensions rose during the encounter when Darby arrived.
Pegues, who violated one of the many unwritten rules of policing by testifying against a fellow cop, has since left the Huntsville Police Department. She applied for a job with the FBI. She's probably better off anywhere else. The PD's internal investigation cleared Darby of wrongdoing. Obviously, the jury of his peers disagreed with PD's assessment.
And she's probably better off being out of Huntsville altogether. The PD tried to get Darby off the hook. So did the city itself, which decided it would spend taxpayer money defending the cop from criminal charges. The city council passed a resolution to pay up to $75,000 of Darby's legal expenses. And it did this without viewing body cam footage of the shooting, despite the fact the city had access to the recordings.
Two powerful figures backed Darby throughout the case.
Huntsville Mayor Tommy Battle and Police Chief Mark McMurray say Officer William Darby did nothing wrong and isn't a murderer.
And continued to support the officer even after Darby was convicted.
Mayor Tommy Battle and Police Chief Mark McMurray even questioned the guilty verdict after the trial.
Once again, they're at odds with a jury that decided the officer did do something wrong and handed down a conviction that says he's a murderer.
And even after the conviction and sentencing, the city continued to support Darby, at least indirectly. The city refused to release footage of the shooting, despite these recordings being entered as evidence in a trial that had reached its conclusion. Journalists from several news outlets (led by AL.com) had to get a court order to obtain copies of the recordings.
AL.com has published the recordings. This is what the jury saw: a cop enter a house and decide -- within 11 seconds -- to kill someone who posed only a threat to himself. The jury also saw another cop already on the scene, one that felt this situation needed to be handled with care and concern, rather than with bullets and violence. Her decision was overridden by Officer Darby, who had had no interaction with the suicidal man other than shouting at him.
Officer Darby didn't spend much time mulling things over before deciding to shoot a fellow human being in the face with a shotgun. He'll have plenty of time to think about it now.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: alabama, huntsville, jeff parker, mark mcmurray, murder, police, tommy battle, william darby
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Why bother with evidence when you've already decided?
The city council passed a resolution to pay up to $75,000 of Darby's legal expenses. And it did this without viewing body cam footage of the shooting, despite the fact the city had access to the recordings.
When you've already decided that cops are never wrong(well, unless they're 'not a team player') then there's no need to view any evidence since unless it aligns with that it's just going to be dismissed immediately anyway. They decided that a cop couldn't be a murderer and they were damned if they were going to decide otherwise, thankfully it looks like the jury wasn't as corrupt.
That aside it's nice to see a nearly mythical 'good cop' show up even if she's now a former cop, something which is sadly not at all surprising given both the department and city were not only willing to give a pass to someone who was at best a cold-blooded killer but their active support and she had the audacity to disagree.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Play stupid games...win 25 years in sentencing for taking another human beings' life.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This will be overturned.
It's not up to the police to exist at the whim of a suicidal person with nothing to lose and a gun.
The cop gave four warnings to drop the gun and the person didn't.
Mental illness is not a get-out-of-jail-free card.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"Mayor Tommy Battle and Police Chief Mark McMurray even questioned the guilty verdict after the trial. "
Citizens should be very concerned that these 2 leaders who represent the concept of law & order in the town seem to think their beliefs trump the legal systems findings.
The city couldn't even be bothered to look at the 11 seconds of video before pledging public funds to defend a murderer. It is one thing to question is the charges fit the crime, it is quite another to ignore all available evidence & make decisions based on not wanting to piss off the union.
One has to wonder is someone might want to take a peek at similar cases here, I mean the internal review found nothing wrong with a cop executing someone after 11 seconds of gathering "information", anyone have any doubt there are other findings that ignore reality?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
At least they didn't shoot the dog when it charged.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A Pail of Cold Water
Newsflash: Chauvin killed no one. As was proved in court. So that nonsense at the beginning of the article makes suspect this other cop. When the Chief of Police think he wasn't guilty? We should go with that. Hindsight is always wrong. The lady cop thought she had the suicidal man with the gun under control? Is that the same as sending a social worker out?
I have got a hot tip: don't walk around with a loaded gun if you don't want to get shot. And here's the obvious fact: the guy wanted to commit suicide by cop. He got his wish. The lady cop had to leave town as she should have left. She's a terrible cop and should go back to waiting tables.
Meanwhile, just another step in destroying any form of law enforcement in the United States. What cop is going to do anything to any violent lunatic with a gun if it means he will suffer the insane hatred of cop haters (like those on Tech Dirt)?
Answer: few. Meaning kiss any law enforcement at all good bye. This is the weirdest experiment in social engineering of all times. Let's just see how it goes, shall we? All the cops are in prison and all the criminals run free (Sympathy for the Devil --Rolling Stones).
Keep going with this lunacy. Hope you have a gun or two.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A Pail of Cold Water
Must be why he got 22.5 years in jail. He was found guilty restless. That means he did kill Floyd and that is what got proved in court.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Well since I'm a constantly negative person, this just goes to show that an officer being convicted of murder accomplishes nothing in the way of systemic change. The good cop leaves town, The shitbag Chief and mayor take bo responsibility. And I won't take a victory lap until every last appeal is exhausted.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Well, you know...
the Good Cop will be a lot harder to replace than the Bad Cop.
It's not that there aren't any good cops, it's that they're in a system where they have to manage as best they can, wherever they have any say in how things go down, quit (or be driven out) when that just gets too damn hard, or go bad themselves.
Let's leave the unhelpfully simplistic, black and white characterizations to the bad cops -- and they've got that down, already.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A Pail of Cold Water
[Hallucinates facts not in evidence]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Well at least Darby found a way to end the ongoing problem. Now he gets to sleep with Bubba and Leroy for a few years. I hear he's gonna play Wide Receiver on the team!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
White cops
It will never fail, white cops who KNOW they can do whatever they want and NEVER be held accountable unless someone actually says something who can do something.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
As I understand it, this site prefers to avoid such humor?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: BAD cops
Sam (and everyone else for that matter), stop it with the racist trolling. Dude. WTF. Makes you no better than any other racist.
This attitude isn’t remotely insightful and your snark isn’t even original. Knock it off.
Not all bad cops are white and not all white cops are bad. You know it too. But you choose to post hate because what? Feels? Hate is hate and you just contributed. Good job adulting and being as bad as they are.
Be a better person and post something other than more hate; it’s not that hard.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The kind of cop trained to “do anything to any violent lunatic with a gun” by people who think cops should treat everyone on the street as a potential “enemy combatant” and the streets themselves as a war zone.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not as a hard rule, but several regular commenters (including myself) do take issue with someone who uses the sexual assault of others as a foundation for a joke.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The best outcome...
...would be for Darby to die in prison. Hopefully by violent actions. Sic Semper Tyrannis.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A Pail of Cold Water
I have got a hot tip: don't walk around with a loaded gun if you don't want to get shot.
You're not keen on the 2nd amendment?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: A Pail of Cold Water
"...don't walk around with a loaded gun..." in your own home "...if you don't want to get shot..." in your own home. There, added a few facts for ya... Also, "you" might not want to have a pet (with protective instincts), a spouse, children, or friends visiting, in case police enter the wrong dwelling and start shooting because they're so afraid...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
She's got balls to say that in court.
Also too bad their aren't more police like her (instead of hallucinating that their job is to be abusive sadists, or silent accomplices)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Why bother with evidence when you've already decided?
The sad part (ANOTHER sad part) is the example now set for other, potentially good cops. Do I speak up... or do I lose my job?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: BAD cops
BUT...he was bald.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A Pail of Cold Water
I'm grateful you will never serve on a jury.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: A Pail of Cold Water
Oh I suspect they are when they or someone they agree with feels like going around armed, though who knows maybe they are in fact arguing that carrying a gun should warrant an immediate on-site execution, something that while homicidally deranged would certainly shut down the NRA and it's members, along with the police and military real quick.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Wipe the copcum off your face, bro, nobody needs to see that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: White cops
As far as I'm concerned there is one color of cop and that is blue.
But NWA did bring up a good point:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The best outcome...
I really want to say they should throw him in solitary confinement for the entire sentence. But I suppose that I should remain somewhat consistent in my belief that prisoners shouldn't be subject to that kind of psychological torture. He'll suffer plenty no matter where he ends up.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A Pail of Cold Water
Aren't you a good little jackboot.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
The cop didn't have to shoot either. I don't think it will be overturned. The face of policing in America is changing.
For the better I think.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
'How dare you threaten to kill yourself, that's the cops' job!'
Nice of you to make clear your belief that the proper response to a suicidal person is on the spot execution, I mean sure it makes you look all sorts of sociopathic and/or homicidal and shows you to be the sort of person I hope never holds any sort of real power as I wouldn't trust you to so much as hand out parking tickets without doing something ahborent but at least you're an honest horrible person and it's always refreshing to see terrible people drop the pretense and just own it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
This is so remarkable as to be almost unbelievable. I believe it, mind you. I am simpme incredulous that she said it. It's obvious and jaw-dropping at the same time.
As noted above, this case will probably be overturned by the Alabama Supreme Court. They are jackbooted cop-lovers. It will NOT be overturned on insufficiency of evidence, though. I predict it will be overturned on some minor matter such as jury instructions. I suspect that they might find portions of Officer Pegues' testimony irrelevant. "Defense of others" is a subjective defense. In other words, it doesn't matter whether Office Pegues felt threatened; it only matters whether Darby perceived her as being threatened. I can see how the AL SC will find her testimony irrelevant and more unfairly prejudicial than probative and reverse the conviction. Disclaimer for all non-legal-nerds: sorry about this last paragraph. It gets deep into the legal minutiae and obscures the true meaning of this story: Darby is a piece of shit.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
First off, which cop gave the warning? I doubt it was the pig with the shotgun.
Secondly, as some who WAS suicidal, I am relieved people like you are not in Singapore.
Lastly, while mental illness isn't a get out of jail free card, cops DO handle mental health cases and should have protocol as to how to handle a suicidal case.
By your twisted logic I should have flung myself off a high building, preferably without informing anyone.
You fucking jackboot.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Murder
The shooting officer was hell bent on firing that gun. He stepped in front of two officers . I’m sure that’s against protocol . Also in that state
Just about every one has a gun. So I guess just holding a legal gun is grounds to get shot in the face . Even if the victim did attempt to lower the gun he still would have been shot by that trigger shoot cop if he did move the gun away from his head
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The best outcome...
Getting murdered by fellow prisoners is not supposed to be part of the sentence. If he is deserving of death, he should be sentenced to death by the justice system*, otherwise that isn't really a justice system.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I agree, but probably not in the way you want. The officer is a disturbed individual, and he will NOT be getting out of jail.
The suicidal victim was also not well, but that's hardly worthy of a death sentence, especially without a judge and jury making that determination. Fortunately for the (ex-)cop, he was afforded that right he so flippantly denied others.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
US cops do handle mental health cases, sadly the same way they handle most other cases.
[ link to this | view in thread ]