MLB In Talks To Offer Streaming For All Teams' Home Games In-Market Even Without A Cable Subscription
from the home-run dept
Streaming options for professional and major college sports has long been a fascination of mine. That is in part because I'm both a fairly big fan of major sports and a fan of streaming over the wire instead of having cable television. My family cut the cord a couple of years back and hasn't looked back since, almost entirely satisfied with our decision. The one area of concern here continues to be being able to stream our local sports teams, as most of the pro sports leagues still have stupid local blackout rules. MLB.TV, the league's fantastic streaming service, has these rules too. While using a DNS proxy is trivially easy, easier would be the league coming to terms with modernity and ending the blackout rules. Notably, MLB did this in 2015 when it came specifically to Fox Sports broadcasts for 15 teams, but as I noted at the time:
But don't think for a single moment that that's where it ends. Even if MLB can't get similar deals in place for the other half of teams in the league, which would fully free up the fantastic MLB.TV product for local streaming, any modicum of success that Fox has with this program will be immediately adopted by the other broadcasters. They really don't have a choice. Cord-cutting isn't going away and it's been professional and college sports that have long kept subscribers tethered.
It took longer than I expected, but it's finally happening. Reports indicate that MLB is currently planning to rollout an all-league streaming option that would end local blackout rules entirely, even for cord-cutters. And, in case you thought this was going to be an MLB-only thing, its bringing the other major leagues along for the ride.
The web-based service — which could address a decades-old annoyance for baseball fans that some have partly blamed for the league’s steadily declining viewership — could launch as early as the 2023 season, a person with direct knowledge of the negotiations said.
The National Basketball Association and the National Hockey League are also considering partnering with MLB on the new streaming service, sources said. Insiders say subscription rates would vary by geographic market and could be between $10 and $20 a month — well below the monthly cost of most cable-TV packages, which can easily stretch past $100.
As you might imagine, the cable companies are not thrilled with this. After all, while cord-cutting has been a steady force in the American media landscape, the dam has yet to burst and that is almost certainly due to the appetite for live sports broadcasts that still sit behind complicated cable television deals these leagues have with broadcast partners. So how is this going to work?
Well, MLB is doing what I suggested almost a decade ago: making the streaming broadcast identical to the television broadcast and giving broadcast partners some of the revenue, while also giving the broadcast commercial advertisements the additional reach of the stream.
Sources said MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred could end up offering cable-TV giants a piece of the streaming revenue to compensate for potential subscriber losses. Manfred’s pitch is that cable TV won’t lose many subscribers, as MLB is mainly targeting younger customers who have already cut the cord, sources said. The cable companies don’t have streaming rights but could retaliate by paying less to broadcast games if they don’t like the bargain, sources said.
As for the teams, MLB’s streaming service would pay them based on viewership in their local markets. One MLB owner said the league has kept its owners appraised, and believes it has general support though no vote has been taken. Indeed, the MLB and team owners are concerned over dire forecasts for viewership. Roughly half of Americans will not be watching cable or satellite TV within a few years, according to Pew Research Center annual surveys.
There is no firm deal yet, as MLB is currently working with broadcast partners and its teams to finalize the plan. Sinclair Broadcasting is a major piece of gum in the works, because of course it is. Sinclair has the broadcast rights for nearly half the league's teams and is putting up a stink, though MLB's strategy appears to be repeatedly pointing out that Sinclair may be in such dire financial trouble such that it can't be trusted to continue operating far into the future.
At first, sources said Sinclair tried to persuade MLB to allow it to control the service for several years before handing the reins to MLB. But the league wasn’t having it, citing Sinclair’s financial condition and raising concerns that the company won’t be able to spend the money that’s needed for high-quality broadcasts, sources said.
In 2019, Sinclair’s Diamond Sports subsidiary paid $9.6 billion for the Fox Regional Sports Networks, since rebranded to Bally’s, giving it exclusive rights to the 14 MLB teams, 16 NBA teams, and 12 NHL teams. It borrowed a staggering $8 billion to fund the deal, sources said. Since then, Dish, Hulu and YouTube TV have stopped carrying the Bally’s RSNs, even as revenue from existing distribution deals has been slammed by cord cutting and subscriber declines. An August Moody’s Investors Service report found that Sinclair “now has an unsustainable capital structure given its very high leverage and weak liquidity.”
Don't threaten me with a good time, Sinclair.
Regardless, everything about these plans represents a massive step in the right direction. Sports leagues will be eyeing how this goes with great interest. When it goes well, as it almost certainly will, this could be the start of a massive change in how sporting events are consumed by the public.
And the end of cable television as we know it.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: baseball, blackouts, cable tv, cord cutting, sports, streaming
Companies: mlb
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
🥺🥺🥺
Really? You mean it? 🥺🥺🥺 *is hopeful*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
just the start
Let's see the NFL, NHL and NBA do the same. Let's see all four big sports band together for a single sports platform. Let's see this go global and include cricket, soccer, any sport popular across the world. This could be the start of something very big.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: just the start
They will NEVER build a unified platform, it might mean making 50 cents less.
Each of them will reinvent the streaming wheel & website, often with really stupid decisions (UltraViolet anyone?) being made to keep control & actually punish the people who want to pay them.
That thing where the sportsball streaming service could include having to ride a sandpaper dildo while watching it & consumers wouldn't even flinch because its not as bad as having Comcast & no stupid commercials (or 90% screen take overs) threatening blackouts of channels you didn't even know you had.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I wouldn’t be too sure about the “reinvent streaming every time” thing; when WWE initially decided to start its own streaming service, they turned to MLB Advanced Media for the infrastructure. No, the biggest issue with a “unified sportsball streaming service” is—as you alluded to—all the different sporting leagues wanting their own piece of the pie. The NBA, the NFL, and the NHL will not want to split revenue with MLB (or each other), and that’s even before you get into leagues for sporting events such as car racing (e.g., NASCAR).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And each one of them will want $20 a month (immediately subject to ratcheting up). So much cheaper than cable for sportsfans!
The MLB move is only good and smart as they are the only one's really going for it right now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't care about baseball, but Sinclair's woes are wonderful, karma for the sneaky merger nonsense and the right wing disinformation 'must run' segments forced on local stations.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If sports teams offered the option to stream every game of an individual team, INCLUDING post season games for a flat fee, I would likely pay for two or three. Two things are likely to happen to kill it for me, no post season included and stupidly high price.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You think Sinclair is a major roadblock in this? Wait until Rogers steps in. Either this will never come to Canada or Rogers will ruin it for everyone. Broadcast rights of Toronto Blue Jays games makes up most of their gross income.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The blackouts never made sense. They are just collective punishment for not enough people turning up at their forcibly-paid-for-by-the-public stadiums.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Local Blackouts
Local blackouts are not necessarily even a good idea for baseball. Many years ago, before a lot of the readers were born, there was a baseball team in Atlanta. It had a fairly large ballpark, Fulton County Stadium, but fairly small crowds of about 5000-7000 per game.
There was also a local businessman named Turner, who owned a UHF TV station. Back then, UHF was considered sort of second-class: some older TV sets did not have tuners for that. The ones which had tuners generally had less-satisfactory continuous-tune knobs rather than ``click'' tuning for each channel. Propagation was a little dodgy as well, probably due as much to poor antennas in the homes as to lousy tower placement. Echos were common, too. However, chan 17 was fairly low UHF, and Turner had good tower location, so reception in the area was pretty good.
Back then, and probably now, TV station owners had to have something to show on their stations around the adverts. Worse, usually the owners had to pay for the content, even if it was mostly reruns and very old re-runs.
Fortunately for Mr. Turner, he also owned a baseball team. Idea: content for his TV station. He started showing pretty much every home game (and road games, too) on his TV station, no doubt paying himself something for the privilege of doing so. I expect that was some of the TV station's most popular programming.
Those games on the TV had a major effect on attendance at the ball park, too. People watched the games on TV, and then started showing up at the ball park as well. I guess they had gotten in the habit of enjoying the games and perhaps rooting for the team.
I think the UHF TV station also eventually became nationally distributed on cable as well. Since I have no cable and generally do not watch TV, and am hundreds of miles from Atlanta, I cannot be sure of the situation there. But the baseball team did very well after it starting showing the home games on local TV.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Purduepharm Buy BEST Products with Overnight Delivery
Purduepharm is the Best place to Buy Adderall, Xanax, Soma, Methadone, Hydrocodone, Norco with Cash on Delivery, We sell top-quality medicines. order and get cash on delivery service, Buy with overnight delivery in the USA at a discounted price from best online pharmacy and best online medical store - Purduepharm
VISIT NOW - https://purduepharm.weebly.com/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]