sophisticatedjanedoe (profile), 11 May 2015 @ 3:04pm
Re: Re: Re:
Rightscorp has a First Amendment right to petition courts for subpoenas to ISPs.
Yet according to another today's news about Rightscorp, ISPs have a First Amendment right to petition their middle finger for replying to said subpoenas by compulsively extending towards Rightscorp.
Tim, this is a very good research and an excellent summary, yet IMO you missed one interesting development involving this "plaintiff" — Leaverson v Killer Joe Nevada appeal pending in the 8th Circuit (see DieTrollDie's post).
What's interesting about this appeal is that the Darren Griffin fraud is brought up, and this issue will hopefully get more deserved traction.
(For those who are not aware, in 2012/2013 Guardaley/Voltage filed around 200 declarations signed by some Darren Griffin, a person who most certainly never existed — on behalf of a fake "Crystal Bay Corporation." This is a Prenda grade shit...)
In addition to gravitational, electromagnetic, strong nuclear, and weak nuclear forces there is one even stronger: the one that draws the three stooges (Hansmeier, Steele, Duffy) together.
John Steele is about to start the same line of "business" in Chicago. He setup a firm "The Accessibility Law Group" and solicits disabled people to become instruments in his get-rich-quick scheme. The website clearly violates the IARDC Rule 7.2(c).
I already tipped Steele that Old Neighborhood Italian American Club doesn't have proper wheelchair access. You may want to add your two cents too.
Duffy is rumored to be involved in The Accessibility Law Group too: this information is currently being verified.
The following day, Friday, March 13, 2015, was my birthday. I was distracted and in a hurry and filed the documents erroneously.
(While I say "he," the text is most like written in Miami: I don't believe the Troll Center would let an inexperienced stooge handle such a serious situation unsupervised.)
Beside attacking Jason Sweet ("Defense counsel is a well-known anti-copyright lawyer" — this is funny!), our drama queen claims that it was him who notified the clerk. I would take it with a grain of salt given the way how he described a similar "mistake" in the Bellwether case:
Once Plaintiff and its counsel were made aware of the mistake, the clerk was immediately contacted and the problem was resolved
I know the circumstances of that event: it wasn't plaintiff's counsel who contacted the clerk.
While I don't claim that the defendant's name exposure was a deliberate action and not a blooper, the results of the poll above are telling: even given that the sample is admittedly biased, it's obvious that there is zero trust in what copyright extortionists say. And plenty of disgust of what they do.
sophisticatedjanedoe (profile), 18 Mar 2015 @ 7:32am
Re: Error in headline?
Also: XArt apparently became hexadecimal :)
(On a serious note, I'm please that the real plaintiff — not "Malibu Media" shell — is mentioned in a headline: Malibu Media was created with the purpose to shield the studio from bad publicity.)
sophisticatedjanedoe (profile), 26 Jan 2015 @ 12:50pm
Copyright troll Evan Stone said in 2012:
There is no commercially available service that can even take advantage of the top-tier bandwidth. You don't need 50Mbps down to use Hulu, Netflix, iTunes or anything. Who the hell pays for 50Mbps down? P2P file-sharers. That's who pays. That's on the Internet side, they're making profits from those who want to file-share.
sophisticatedjanedoe (profile), 16 Jan 2015 @ 5:09pm
What if this is a sophisticated conspiracy?
1. Chartier pisses off crew workers, including those who have access to pre-releases. 2. Pissed off workers leak pre-releases to the torrents as a revenge. 3. Chartier and his German friends shake down file-sharers. 4. Profit.
On the post: Cox Claims Rightscorp's 'Extortionate' Lawsuit Really A Backdoor Way To Get Subscribers' Info
On the post: There Aren't Many Ways To Do Online Reputation Management Right, And This Isn't One Of Them
Therefore, the appropriate title should be "Notice of Theft of Defamation."
On the post: Rightscorp Wins Anti-SLAPP Claim Against Guy Who Sued After Being Bullied With Robocalls
Re: Copyright Theft
On the post: Rightscorp Wins Anti-SLAPP Claim Against Guy Who Sued After Being Bullied With Robocalls
Re: Re: Re:
Yet according to another today's news about Rightscorp, ISPs have a First Amendment right to petition their middle finger for replying to said subpoenas by compulsively extending towards Rightscorp.
All fair.
On the post: Copyright Troll Gets Fed; Resumes Torrent Lawsuits After Multiple Dismissals Led To A 19-Month Pause In Filings
What's interesting about this appeal is that the Darren Griffin fraud is brought up, and this issue will hopefully get more deserved traction.
(For those who are not aware, in 2012/2013 Guardaley/Voltage filed around 200 declarations signed by some Darren Griffin, a person who most certainly never existed — on behalf of a fake "Crystal Bay Corporation." This is a Prenda grade shit...)
On the post: Estate Of Joseph Goebbels Using Copyright To Demand Cash From New Biographer
On the post: Former Prenda Lawyer Hit With A $50,000 Counterclaim In ADA Shakedown Lawsuit
Re: John Steele
On the post: Former Prenda Lawyer Hit With A $50,000 Counterclaim In ADA Shakedown Lawsuit
John Steele
John Steele is about to start the same line of "business" in Chicago. He setup a firm "The Accessibility Law Group" and solicits disabled people to become instruments in his get-rich-quick scheme. The website clearly violates the IARDC Rule 7.2(c).
I already tipped Steele that Old Neighborhood Italian American Club doesn't have proper wheelchair access. You may want to add your two cents too.
Duffy is rumored to be involved in The Accessibility Law Group too: this information is currently being verified.
On the post: Massive Copyright Troll Malibu Media/xArt Defies Court Order To Publicly Name Defendant
Young Yousef replied to the order to show cause. Of course he said it was a mistake.
(While I say "he," the text is most like written in Miami: I don't believe the Troll Center would let an inexperienced stooge handle such a serious situation unsupervised.)
Beside attacking Jason Sweet ("Defense counsel is a well-known anti-copyright lawyer" — this is funny!), our drama queen claims that it was him who notified the clerk. I would take it with a grain of salt given the way how he described a similar "mistake" in the Bellwether case:
I know the circumstances of that event: it wasn't plaintiff's counsel who contacted the clerk.
While I don't claim that the defendant's name exposure was a deliberate action and not a blooper, the results of the poll above are telling: even given that the sample is admittedly biased, it's obvious that there is zero trust in what copyright extortionists say. And plenty of disgust of what they do.
On the post: Massive Copyright Troll Malibu Media/xArt Defies Court Order To Publicly Name Defendant
Re: Error in headline?
(On a serious note, I'm please that the real plaintiff — not "Malibu Media" shell — is mentioned in a headline: Malibu Media was created with the purpose to shield the studio from bad publicity.)
On the post: Massive Copyright Troll Malibu Media/xArt Defies Court Order To Publicly Name Defendant
On the post: More Copyright Trolls Rushing In To Take Advantage Of Canadian Copyright Notice System Loopholes
Re:
On the post: Jury Says Robin Thicke And Pharrell Infringed... Even If They Didn't Mean To: Told To Pay $7.3 Million
On the post: Former Revenge Pornster Chance Trahan Reinvents Himself... As Shark Tank's Daymond John
On the post: Chubby Vs. Fat: The Pointless Noodle Trademark War
Re: Coming soon!
On the post: Chubby Vs. Fat: The Pointless Noodle Trademark War
On the post: Cable Industry Fights New 25 Mbps Broadband Definition Because The Need For Those Speeds Is 'Hypothetical'
Different people, same song.
On the post: MPAA Boss Chris Dodd Talks About Sony Hack & Free Speech... Ignoring How It Revealed MPAA's Plan To Undermine Free Speech
On the post: Copyright Troll And Famed Movie Producer Nicolas Chartier Debunks Entire Hollywood Talking Point About Protecting The 'Little Guy'
On the post: Copyright Troll And Famed Movie Producer Nicolas Chartier Debunks Entire Hollywood Talking Point About Protecting The 'Little Guy'
1. Chartier pisses off crew workers, including those who have access to pre-releases.
2. Pissed off workers leak pre-releases to the torrents as a revenge.
3. Chartier and his German friends shake down file-sharers.
4. Profit.
Next >>