...'cause we have been exposed to propaganda about eye-ran for so long...
like so many other 'issues' which were mini-false-flags, achminawhateverthefuckhisnamewas (yes, the irony...) did not have the views ascribed to him as reported in our media...
it was generally a lot more subtle than that...
but, since eye-ran were teh evil, NOTHING they said could be construed as 'positive'/good, and EVERYTHING they said was spun as threatening...
same ole same ole: unka sam bullhorning everyone else down, so truth was perverted, and lies were promulgated...
just another day in Empire...
Re: Re: Requires a moral and legal fix, NOT more technical.
actually, they literally -as in 'literally', not 'figuratively'- abandoned that as their operative motto a while back...
i'm guessing right about the first time the nsa bent them over and lubed up...
sorry, guiliani *CREATED* MANY of the problems with the radio systems and emergency command post, etc, which came to light BEFORE nine one one, but were NOT addressed, because...
well...
because MOTHERFUCKIN' EAGLES ! ! !
is why, bitchez...
i will bang the drum for my new meme:
reporters, etc should have no rights SUPERIOR to all of us nobodies: they are acting as OUR proxies, therefore, they have the SAME rights as each of us as individuals have, and vice versa...
in effect, we are ALL 'reporters' as citizens, only: there are some people (AND corporations) who act (supposedly) on OUR BEHALF as proxies for getting/disseminating information, attending meetings/pressers/ etc, that is IMPOSSIBLE for all of us regular citizens to make time to do...
we ALL have the same rights The They (tm) are trying to eliminate for both citizens AND citizens-as-reporters; it is of a piece...
as far as i'm concerned, there is NO RIGHT/mechanism THE STATE has to dissuade, discourage, or criminalize the gathering and reporting of facts WE ALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO... it is only because we live in a specialized society, that we have some citizens doing the work for us which we ALL would ordinarily have the right to do, period, period, period...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
WE ALL get access to public documents, NOT JUST reporters; WE ALL get access to public meetings, etc, NOT JUST reporters; WE ALL enjoy 'shield laws', 'protecting sources', etc 'rights', NOT JUST reporters...
*ouch*
i *wish* that would leave a mark, but i'm thinking saint obama is just as sociopathic as the rest of them...
only, obama/et al are WORSE than j edna hoover: he only targeted a relative few high-profile loudmouths and dissenters; while choco jesu is 'targeting' EVERYONE...
where are today's welch that says, 'at long last, have you no shame...'
unfortunately, i know the answer to that one: no, they don't have any shame...
...in wondering why the wapo released this during the normal 'bury the story' time frame...
as the wapo has LONG been working hand-in-glove with the -in general- powers that be, and -in particular- with the alphabet soup spooks...
limited hangouts, and all that...
they can't avoid ALL the slime that is being revealed, so they might as well control some portion of it from being presented in too revelatory fashion...
(oh, and -once again, for the umpteenth time- revelatory is TOO a fucking word, you useless spel czech crapware)
also, completely agree with the poster who talked about how this DECREASES computer security for EVERYONE (including the attackers!): you make a tool, someone is going to turn it against you, sure as night follows day...
for a BUNCH of reasons, which include: i used to (not so much anymore, but occasionally) get text message (and voice mail) that was delayed by hours to days (sometime as much as a week), for no fathomable reason (nsa delay ?)...
HOW is someone to be held liable for that kind of situation, EVEN IF you stipulated the illogic of it all ? ? ?
(as an aside, it is weird that my TABLET set up with google voice, gets my text message BEFORE they arrive on my phone; i'm not even sure how that is possible... the google voice on the tablet gets text messages a good 5-10-15 seconds before my phone jingles that i have a text message... weird but true...)
usually, scumbag spook in country A, gets scumbag spook in country B to spy on someone back in country A that they are not 'allowed' (i know, i know, i make a funny!) to spy on; then scumbag spook in country A will return the favor and spy on someone in country B for their scumbag spooks...
the mafia had a term for this: one hand washes the other...
and that is about all you need to know: 'our' (sic) countries are nothing more than loosely affiliated criminal enterprises to do the bidding of the billionaire puppetmasters...
the worst part is, he -as a bunch already are- would be elected as a kongresskritter, in the vast wasteland of ignorant amerika that is the bible belt...
(see: bachman, michelle; cruz, ted; etc ad nauseum...)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I wonder if I will read articles here again
bwa ha ha ha haaaaa
not only no true scotsman, but no true scotsman xtians ! ! !
what a joke, for someone who disdains 'logic' and 'rational thinking' in the context of religion, you sure do use your fatally flawed version of it (albeit in a closed system) to attempt to 'convince' others of their flawed thinking...
yep, any xtian (which begs the question: there is no defining rules for claiming to be a xtian: YOU JUST SAY YOU ARE... you're bullshit 'definition' of whoever you don't think is a good xtian, is therefore not a xtian, is a sort of arrogance you are unable to see...
self-awareness is not a strongpoint of religionists...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I wonder if I will read articles here again
so, you're not armed ? ? ?
'cause, if you have a gun, a person will 'believe' whatever you want them to believe...
that is *generally* how a lot of religionists have gotten people to 'believe' *their* Big Sky Daddy stories...
another favorite tactic, is to take unformed children and indoctrinate them in the cult their parents are in, they are powerless to resist, and don't know any better...
On the post: Twitter Diplomacy? New Iranian Officials Use Twitter To Make Surprising Moves To Cool Tensions Over Israel And Nukes
well, just *seems* like a big deal...
like so many other 'issues' which were mini-false-flags, achminawhateverthefuckhisnamewas (yes, the irony...) did not have the views ascribed to him as reported in our media...
it was generally a lot more subtle than that...
but, since eye-ran were teh evil, NOTHING they said could be construed as 'positive'/good, and EVERYTHING they said was spun as threatening...
same ole same ole: unka sam bullhorning everyone else down, so truth was perverted, and lies were promulgated...
just another day in Empire...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
On the post: The US Government Has Betrayed The Internet; It's Time To Fix That Now
Re: Re: Requires a moral and legal fix, NOT more technical.
i'm guessing right about the first time the nsa bent them over and lubed up...
On the post: NSA & GCHQ Covertly Took Over Security Standards, Recruited Telco Employees To Insert Backdoors
Re: This may not be the popular opinion here...
ANY and ALL secret institutions WILL become corrupted...
repeat:
ANY and ALL secret institutions WILL become corrupted...
you don't need to go any further than that...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
On the post: Petulant Billionaire NY Mayor Continues To Insist He's Never Wrong; Sues City Council Over Stop-And-Frisk Legislation
Re: Re: Re:
well...
because MOTHERFUCKIN' EAGLES ! ! !
is why, bitchez...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
On the post: Court Tells Journalist Barrett Brown He And His Lawyers Can't Talk To The Press Any More
Re: Definition of Media
reporters, etc should have no rights SUPERIOR to all of us nobodies: they are acting as OUR proxies, therefore, they have the SAME rights as each of us as individuals have, and vice versa...
in effect, we are ALL 'reporters' as citizens, only: there are some people (AND corporations) who act (supposedly) on OUR BEHALF as proxies for getting/disseminating information, attending meetings/pressers/ etc, that is IMPOSSIBLE for all of us regular citizens to make time to do...
we ALL have the same rights The They (tm) are trying to eliminate for both citizens AND citizens-as-reporters; it is of a piece...
as far as i'm concerned, there is NO RIGHT/mechanism THE STATE has to dissuade, discourage, or criminalize the gathering and reporting of facts WE ALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO... it is only because we live in a specialized society, that we have some citizens doing the work for us which we ALL would ordinarily have the right to do, period, period, period...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
WE ALL get access to public documents, NOT JUST reporters; WE ALL get access to public meetings, etc, NOT JUST reporters; WE ALL enjoy 'shield laws', 'protecting sources', etc 'rights', NOT JUST reporters...
On the post: Canada's Copyright Board Shuts Down Industry's Request For 'You Must Be A Criminal Tax' On MicroSD Cards
Re:
makes more sense than THEIR scheme...
...and would give better results for society ! ! !
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
On the post: Canada's Copyright Board Shuts Down Industry's Request For 'You Must Be A Criminal Tax' On MicroSD Cards
Re:
signed,
the inernet
On the post: MLK Jr.'s Sons Celebrate 50th Anniversary Of 'I Have A Dream' By Suing His Daughter
Re:
i *wish* that would leave a mark, but i'm thinking saint obama is just as sociopathic as the rest of them...
only, obama/et al are WORSE than j edna hoover: he only targeted a relative few high-profile loudmouths and dissenters; while choco jesu is 'targeting' EVERYONE...
where are today's welch that says, 'at long last, have you no shame...'
unfortunately, i know the answer to that one: no, they don't have any shame...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
On the post: Feds Waged Hundreds Of Cyberattacks On Other Countries; Spent $25 Million Buying Vulnerabilities
i presume you were being droll...
as the wapo has LONG been working hand-in-glove with the -in general- powers that be, and -in particular- with the alphabet soup spooks...
limited hangouts, and all that...
they can't avoid ALL the slime that is being revealed, so they might as well control some portion of it from being presented in too revelatory fashion...
(oh, and -once again, for the umpteenth time- revelatory is TOO a fucking word, you useless spel czech crapware)
also, completely agree with the poster who talked about how this DECREASES computer security for EVERYONE (including the attackers!): you make a tool, someone is going to turn it against you, sure as night follows day...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
On the post: Court Says Feds Don't Have To Reveal Secret Evidence It Gathered Against 'Terror' Suspect Using FISA
Re:
its slime all the way down, mr feynman ! ! !
On the post: Court Says You Can Be Liable For Merely Sending A Text Message To Someone Who's Driving
Re: Re:
for a BUNCH of reasons, which include: i used to (not so much anymore, but occasionally) get text message (and voice mail) that was delayed by hours to days (sometime as much as a week), for no fathomable reason (nsa delay ?)...
HOW is someone to be held liable for that kind of situation, EVEN IF you stipulated the illogic of it all ? ? ?
(as an aside, it is weird that my TABLET set up with google voice, gets my text message BEFORE they arrive on my phone; i'm not even sure how that is possible... the google voice on the tablet gets text messages a good 5-10-15 seconds before my phone jingles that i have a text message... weird but true...)
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
On the post: Best Response To A Copyright Threat Ever? Lawyers Explain Why ABA Is Full Of S**t In Claiming Copyright On Routing Numbers
Re: Re:
a semi-honest parasite, er, lawyer ! ! !
didn't think i'd live to see the day...
On the post: Police Admit That NZ Spy Agency Illegally Spied On Kim Dotcom, But Aren't Going To Do Anything About It
well, this *is* highly unusual...
the mafia had a term for this: one hand washes the other...
and that is about all you need to know: 'our' (sic) countries are nothing more than loosely affiliated criminal enterprises to do the bidding of the billionaire puppetmasters...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
On the post: DailyDirt: This Is Your Brain On Caffeine. Any Questions?
caffeine factoid...
(ie is MORE 'deadly')
just sayin'...
On the post: Evangelist Adorns Biblical Child Rearing Book With 'Modern Family' Portrait He Found Via Google
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: and now we come to religion...
was it the father, the son or the holy ghost ? ? ?
(*where* did this 'holy ghost' crap come from ? ? ? do you have a reference for that ? ? ?) *snort*
as an aside, i have yet to see an explanation where this tri-partite god thing came from... which one is the biggest god, god i presume ? ? ?
On the post: Evangelist Adorns Biblical Child Rearing Book With 'Modern Family' Portrait He Found Via Google
Re:
(see: bachman, michelle; cruz, ted; etc ad nauseum...)
On the post: Evangelist Adorns Biblical Child Rearing Book With 'Modern Family' Portrait He Found Via Google
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I wonder if I will read articles here again
On the post: Evangelist Adorns Biblical Child Rearing Book With 'Modern Family' Portrait He Found Via Google
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I wonder if I will read articles here again
not only no true scotsman, but no true scotsman xtians ! ! !
what a joke, for someone who disdains 'logic' and 'rational thinking' in the context of religion, you sure do use your fatally flawed version of it (albeit in a closed system) to attempt to 'convince' others of their flawed thinking...
yep, any xtian (which begs the question: there is no defining rules for claiming to be a xtian: YOU JUST SAY YOU ARE... you're bullshit 'definition' of whoever you don't think is a good xtian, is therefore not a xtian, is a sort of arrogance you are unable to see...
self-awareness is not a strongpoint of religionists...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof
On the post: Evangelist Adorns Biblical Child Rearing Book With 'Modern Family' Portrait He Found Via Google
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I wonder if I will read articles here again
reference: none so blind...
On the post: Evangelist Adorns Biblical Child Rearing Book With 'Modern Family' Portrait He Found Via Google
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I wonder if I will read articles here again
'cause, if you have a gun, a person will 'believe' whatever you want them to believe...
that is *generally* how a lot of religionists have gotten people to 'believe' *their* Big Sky Daddy stories...
another favorite tactic, is to take unformed children and indoctrinate them in the cult their parents are in, they are powerless to resist, and don't know any better...
Next >>