How about something to make people more responsible for what they say period?? Would that go over well with any particular segment of the population, like maybe politicians?
You might want to re-educate yourself about the US. Our natural resources are nowhere near depleted. Not to mention that a significant portion of the anti-IP comments you read here are from Americans, as is the whole blog. Yes we do have a rather large military, are we using it to try to take over the world?
You obviously haven't used google to search for anything along with the word torrent. The number of hits you get makes the pirate bay look very small time.
Unfortunately, encryption while a temporary solution, doesn't fix the problem. Remember, if it can be encrypted by man, with enough computer assistance, it can be broken by man.
Then perhaps you should do a little research on Hugo Chavez. He has essentially set himself up as the President for life. Until of course people like these are successful in calling for a coup d'etat.
And you're an idiot, because no matter what Mike may personally think of your post, he doesn't erase them. Once again, this blog is about the discussions. Even you outburst classifies and so it will be left here for the rest of us to see.
When discussing the Federal Government of the United States, anything the government owns the copyright on, is automatically in the public domain. In this instance, apparently the contract issued when the work was commissioned left out the fact that the government should get full copyright on the work. Personally, I believe that it should be a given that any work done on commission, should be classified as a work for hire and the paying entity should receive the full copyright, but what do I know?
I believe in this instance they are probably referring to medications made by a company who doesn't license a particular formula from the patent owner.
While I won't argue your point, if the klutz I hand the hard drive to can't hold onto it and it hits the floor with a significant impact, I didn't destroy evidence, the numb nuts obtaining it did.
On the post: ACS:Law Now Using Dubious Legal Theories To Threaten Slyck.com
On the post: Ad Age Explains How Copyright Is The Buggy Whip Of The Digital Age
Re: Re:
On the post: California Court Says Online Bullying Is Not Protected Free Speech
Re:
On the post: EU Proposes Criminalizing Inducing Infringement In ACTA Draft; Could Outlaw Google
Re:
On the post: EU Proposes Criminalizing Inducing Infringement In ACTA Draft; Could Outlaw Google
Re:
On the post: Court Effectively Says No 4th Amendment Protection To Copies Of Emails
Re: Infinite goods
On the post: Dan Bull Recaps How Home Taping Killed Music With His Latest Song
On the post: Venezuela Next Up To Try To Censor The Internet
Re: Re:
On the post: Venezuela Next Up To Try To Censor The Internet
On the post: When You Try To Figure Out Who Owns Imaginary 'Property,' Things Get Confusing Fast
Re:
On the post: Brazil Moves Forward With Plan To Ignore US Patents And Copyrights After US Refuses To Abide By WTO Ruling
Re: Re: Impact to US citizens
On the post: Is Amazon Blocking Reviews Of Assassin's Creed Over DRM Issues? [Update]
On the post: Topeka (Sorta) Changes Its Name To Google, In Blatant Suck Up For Fiber
On the post: US Postage Stamp Found To Be Infringing On Copyright Over Statues In US Korean War Memorial
On the post: Confused Musician Threatens Google, Blog Because Her Works Are Found Elsewhere On The Internet
Re: Re: Except...
On the post: Confused Musician Threatens Google, Blog Because Her Works Are Found Elsewhere On The Internet
Re: Re:
On the post: Administration Asks For Public Input On Intellectual Property Enforcement
Re: Re:
On the post: Olympics: Thou Shalt Not Tweet (Without Paying Up)
Re: In defense of the IOC
On the post: ACTA's Internet Chapter Leaks; And, Now We See How Sneaky The Negotiators Have Been
Re: Re:
On the post: School District Says It Only Turned Spy Cameras On 42 Times; FBI Now Investigating
Re: Re: Life, the universe and everything
Next >>