no, godaddy was supporting taking away people's rights. Theirs were never taken away. You know why? They had an exemption from the bill they were in support of.
In reality, it's too little too late - you know they already support it, so the danger is there whether they change their view or not.
yep, but they'll have 3 or 4 years of DOJ/DHS cowboy policing of the entire country (and rampant censorship) before a judge finally gets to review it and make such a determination.
That's not even a stretch of logic from what MPAA is saying, to imply that they want censorship. They do, and they don't realize what it would do and break and screw up.
At it's core, MPAA is saying you can't fight copyright infringement without censorship. So guess what?
the pirate party requires minimal funding at best, so trying to kill them off won't do much. Young people want to support the pirate party because it represents their interests much more than anything the green party can show for, even if they are recognizing necessary change.
this is exactly how they could subpoena *anyone*. Saying that a TOS violation is a reason to be able to subpoena for more information, in stating that it's possible a federal crime is committed.
Just because you state this, doesn't mean it's fact. Quite the opposite. also, hello bieber lawyer and/or someone on that legal team! we know how this works.
"keep bieber free from copyright" doesn't mean bieber has anything to do with the cause other than being affected by it.
oh high, rightshaven employee! sucks to be you (or a lawyer on their team), doesn't it?
You know, techdirt has these little gravatar things, you might want to look into what they are, as we can see the last 6-8 spam comments you've made in a row(and every comment like it on other articles).
you lost me at freetard, in the first sentence. Honestly, troll better please. At least on fark people put a little more effort in it than your trolling than "herpa derp".
0/10. No definition of successful troll involves failing that hard.
On the post: GoDaddy Says It Doesn't Support PIPA Either, As Domains Keep Transferring Away
Re:
no, godaddy was supporting taking away people's rights. Theirs were never taken away. You know why? They had an exemption from the bill they were in support of.
In reality, it's too little too late - you know they already support it, so the danger is there whether they change their view or not.
On the post: Righthaven.com Domain Auction Has Begun
Re:
On the post: Justice Department Hanging Onto Torrent-Finder Because It Doesn't Like How Search Engines Work
Re: Re: On what grounds?
On the post: MPAA Boss: If The Chinese Censor The Internet Without A Problem, Why Can't The US?
he didn't stretch it
At it's core, MPAA is saying you can't fight copyright infringement without censorship. So guess what?
On the post: RIAA Doesn't Apologize For Year-Long Blog Censorship; Just Stands By Its Claim That The Site Broke The Law
site operator never objected = they never read our emails
how about "the RIAA never once put in effort into reaching the site operator of Dajaz1"
On the post: Court Dismisses Puerto 80 Rojadirecta Case (For Now)... But Doesn't Give Back The Domain
let's get back to the basics of the subject line - what piracy?
nothing they have done falls under either category.
On the post: The Pirate Party Effect: German Greens Scramble To Draw Up Digital Policies To Hold On To Voters
it won't work here
On the post: Just Because New Artist Platforms Aren't Minting Millionaires Doesn't Mean These Platforms Have Failed
digital music news seems very pro RIAA to me
did anyone notice the very suspicious slant of anti-indie, pro big label from them that I did?
Spotify coverage, grooveshark, wyclef, sopa, minimum wage and rihanna as the "featured artist" so to speak.
On the post: Sen. Joe Lieberman Asks Google For A 'Report Blog As Terrorist' Button
can we report the white house?
On the post: Why Does The Government Fear Free Speech?
Re: Re: Works for privacy to
On the post: Why Does The Government Fear Free Speech?
Re: Works for privacy to
On the post: Microsoft 'Anti-Piracy' Campaign Explains Why It's Bad For Businesses To Pay For Microsoft Software
I agree
I noticed they added brazil. Guess they're not happy after the JTC huh!
On the post: DOJ Two Step: It Should Be A Criminal Offense To Lie About Your Age On Facebook... But We Probably Won't Go After You For It
makes perfect sense
sad, but unsurprising.
On the post: A Look At The Testimony Given At Today's SOPA Lovefest Congressional Hearings... With A Surprise From MasterCard
Re: Re: Re:
not that you couldn't figure out which is which.
On the post: Ron Paul Comes Out Against SOPA; Joins Other Elected Officials Saying No To The Great Firewall Of America
Re: OK, It's official
On the post: Justin Bieber Sends Cease & Desist To FreeBieber Campaign
Re:
"keep bieber free from copyright" doesn't mean bieber has anything to do with the cause other than being affected by it.
On the post: Another Court Makes Righthaven Pay Up For Its Trolling Ways
Re:
You know, techdirt has these little gravatar things, you might want to look into what they are, as we can see the last 6-8 spam comments you've made in a row(and every comment like it on other articles).
On the post: Louisiana Makes It Illegal To Use Cash For Secondhand Sales
Re: Re:
On the post: Wyden: PROTECT IP Act Is About Letting The Content Sector Attack The Innovation Sector
Re:
0/10. No definition of successful troll involves failing that hard.
On the post: Confused Indian Anti-Piracy Group Asks Us To Remove Article It Doesn't Like From Some Other Blog
Aiplexx = MPAA, don't forget
Next >>