well, well Mr. Recording Industry Exec "It's Not Censorship To Block Sits You Don't Like, that's like saying, if someone steals every penny you have then it's not theft because your rich.
the court is just going to have to admit that they can not remove any request involving the erasing of criminal or civil charges. honestly the court should have known the sheer amount of criminals who would try to use this to wipe their crimes from the internet.
does this mean the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation can't be a charity because it uses proprietary software from Microsoft which is a for profit entity? do all charity's get exempted from not profit status if a for profit entity uses the charity's name or logo on promotional materials to drum up business by pointing out how much of a "philanthropist" the corporation is.
why is the old guard so deadset, knowing they have maybe ten years left before the entire old guard is ushered out for the generations after 1980 have to do everything they can to screw up the government bureaucracy just like they did with the economy/jobs/environment/law/copyright system/ insert anything you can think of/
wikipedia should just make it so that in the TOS for signing up you have to disclose your job in PR and then if you don't they have the legal right to make you pay them 500,000 dollars and you agree to binding arbitration and give up all rights to seek redress in a jurisdiction that you live in.
the police more than likely had the permission of the homeowner who paid for the wifi. a criminal should never be allowed to claim evidence was improperly collected from OTHER PEOPLES PROPERTY. if someone breaks into my home and the police investigates finding fingerprints which eventually find the thief. the thief has no right to contest the arrest on the grounds that taking his fingerprints from my home violated his rights.
the criminal should have never had a leg to stand on simply because the wifi was not his and therefore he didn't have the legal right to deny the police to run the "moocherhunter" software. if you access other peoples wifi or home without permission and leave behind evidence they can use against you then expect that it WILL BE USED AGAINST YOU.
UPS’ long-standing policy is to require a legal court-ordered process, such as a subpoena, before responding to any third-party requests,” UPS spokeswoman Kara Ross wrote in an e-mail to TheBlot Magazine. “UPS is not aware of any court orders from the NSA seeking to inspect technology-related shipments.”
translation: we do allow the government to do it, because a NSL or document from the FISA court is a valid legal order. however, other than those instances no subpena have ever been served to us.
the responding officer should have arrested the principal for conspiracy to commit child abuse, destruction of evidence, and intimating a witness. it's time these petty little dictators are taught that letting kids be bullied because they aren't on the "Favorites" list is a crime.
what the supreme court fails to understand here is that there aren't many reasonable people in the law enforcement field anymore. i mean they expect officers who think that killing unarmed men on tape is no big deal, or prosecutors who hide evidence and see no problem with people spending decades in prison they should not have had to as "reasonable people." this situation is worsened by politicians who think their town needs an armored assault victim for an epidemic of "cop killings" that amounts to two offers in 30 years. reasonable people left the law side of the government years ago.
"Do you really want the owner of a flower shop to be personally liable if someone pricks their finger?"
someone pricking their finger is not a crime. i love how you come up with a civil matter that would be laughed out of the court as a reason to exclude executives from being forced to confront their criminal actions.
for example, a CEO ordering a private security officer to beat someone half to death, as a coercion tactic is something they get away with all the time. These CEO's came closer every day to bringing this country down than the hijackers on Sept 11 and not one of them is facing criminal charges. all the while the government is destroying the foundations of this country to bring "criminals and terrorists" to justice.
the only way to fix capitalism is to remove corporate person hood, and to update the laws so that when CEO's and other corporate executives that commit, allow or order crimes to be committed they can be prosecuted up to and including capital offenses.
the Republican started the programs, the democrats just got unlucky that it was revealed that these programs existed during the administration of a democratic president.
i'm no legal scholar but since microsoft found the leaker through violating The Electronic Communications Privacy Act or the Wiretap Act can the leaker be prosecuted since all evidence is fruit of a posionious tree
if this ruling goes in Smokey's favor then it's only a matter of time before the sony bono copyright act is ruled unconstitutional since it expands copyright beyond the life of the only party who legally has claim to the copyright.
the laws should ban distracted driving. they should however make you guilty of capital murder if anyone is hurt because your to much of a idiot to stop playing angry birds or watching hulu to pay attention to driving. and any accident that doesn't involve fatalities is automatically and fully your fault.
I've always suspected Huawei , being backed by the a secretive communist government, might be spying on me which is why i avoided their products, what made me scream at the top of my lungs in rage was the discovery that Cisco was doing it.
if they find the wiretap illegal everything is gone. there is nothing to prove he did anything it's all fruit of the poisonous tree. double jeopardy does attach
On the post: Recording Industry Exec Says It's Not Censorship To Block Sites He Doesn't Like
On the post: Another Right To Be Forgotten Request Backfires Completely
On the post: IRS Rejects Non-Profit Status For Open Source Organization, Because Private Companies Might Use The Software
why is the old guard so deadset, knowing they have maybe ten years left before the entire old guard is ushered out for the generations after 1980 have to do everything they can to screw up the government bureaucracy just like they did with the economy/jobs/environment/law/copyright system/ insert anything you can think of/
On the post: Group Of Major PR Firms Pledge To Play Nice On Wikipedia
teach them to screw around with the site.
On the post: Appeals Court Says Using Open WiFi May Be A Crime
the police more than likely had the permission of the homeowner who paid for the wifi. a criminal should never be allowed to claim evidence was improperly collected from OTHER PEOPLES PROPERTY. if someone breaks into my home and the police investigates finding fingerprints which eventually find the thief. the thief has no right to contest the arrest on the grounds that taking his fingerprints from my home violated his rights.
the criminal should have never had a leg to stand on simply because the wifi was not his and therefore he didn't have the legal right to deny the police to run the "moocherhunter" software. if you access other peoples wifi or home without permission and leave behind evidence they can use against you then expect that it WILL BE USED AGAINST YOU.
On the post: UPS Insists That It Is Not Helping The NSA 'Interdict' Packages To Install Backdoors
translation: we do allow the government to do it, because a NSL or document from the FISA court is a valid legal order. however, other than those instances no subpena have ever been served to us.
On the post: Georgia To Protect Execution Pharmacists From Transparency So They Can Execute Disabled Man
"what are you hiding Georgia, if you have done nothing wrong then there's no need for secrecy or privacy."
On the post: Finally, Someone Acts Like An Adult: District Attorney Drops Charges Against Bullied Teen Who Recorded His Tormentors
On the post: Supreme Court May Take A Shot At Defining The Point At Which Protected Speech Becomes An Unprotectable 'Threat'
On the post: Is The Zero Marginal Cost Society The End Of Capitalism... Or A Way To Fix Capitalism?
someone pricking their finger is not a crime. i love how you come up with a civil matter that would be laughed out of the court as a reason to exclude executives from being forced to confront their criminal actions.
for example, a CEO ordering a private security officer to beat someone half to death, as a coercion tactic is something they get away with all the time. These CEO's came closer every day to bringing this country down than the hijackers on Sept 11 and not one of them is facing criminal charges. all the while the government is destroying the foundations of this country to bring "criminals and terrorists" to justice.
On the post: Is The Zero Marginal Cost Society The End Of Capitalism... Or A Way To Fix Capitalism?
On the post: Senator Leahy: If President Obama Is Serious About Ending Bulk Collection, He Can Just End It This Friday
On the post: Microsoft Looked Through Reporter's Hotmail And MSN Chat Accounts To Identify Windows 8 Leaker
On the post: Smokey Robinson Sues Ex-Wife To Prevent Her From Claiming 50% Of His Recaptured Motown Hits
On the post: Google's Fight Against Distracted Driving Laws Might Not Be A Bad Thing For The Inevitable, Glorious Transhumanist Future
Re:
On the post: Google's Fight Against Distracted Driving Laws Might Not Be A Bad Thing For The Inevitable, Glorious Transhumanist Future
On the post: U.S.: We Have No Evidence Or Credibility On This Whatsoever, But Don't Use Huawei Because China Might Spy On You
On the post: New Zealand Spy Agency Deleted Evidence About Its Illegal Spying On Kim Dotcom
On the post: NSA Surveillance Faces First Constitutional Challenge From Guy Arrested With Secret NSA Evidence
Re:
On the post: DOJ Says Company That Vetted Snowden Faked 665,000 Background Checks
Next >>