Easily broken, easily played, easily reviewed, easily modded. All behaviors of your fan-base that in the majority restricts new users and the non-tech savvy people from fully enjoying your game.
You tell someone not to do something it's the first dam thing there going to do. Freedom doesn't come from prohibition, or have we learned nothing in 200 years?
"...but what if LulzSec (or a similar group, now that LulzSec says it's going away) makes a unilateral decision on something you disagree with?..."
You want to get in the grit of it Mike? A great man once said you cannot have freedom without civil disobedience. Next time the hypothetical comes to mind such as if = dislike of something first ask the end result. Was it intended? Is this what this group set out to do?
If you so dam worried about when the results are finished what happens to this group of skills. How about government (or those sponsoring it) fearing the people as any freedom based culture requires.
Lulzsec, in my opinion, is needed in this day and age. Need an example? Ever realize you've writ cognitive dissonance more this past month then I care to recall in 8 odd years.
Hello old friend your back again. This issue is why I started reading TechDirt in the first place. I knew it be back with, as you said it plainly, cognitive dissonance.
Wonder if it this will get traction again in the world of copyright though. As the world turns.
Aka any cam user that a)uses music in there act b)uses it to make a living c)Legislation that the dollar damage figure is based on what exactly? What harm are they doing to another? You think your fellow man, attempting to make a HONEST dollar with there own work is criminal? Who's misleading who here?
Here's a thought. They are after all senators and part of there duty is to uphold the constitution. Yet, in the course of there duties they are to listen to there constituents in there respective states and vote accordingly. Furthermore to actually read the bill they are voting on for said constituents. Conclusion is how the hell is in the best interest of the People.
Not corruption? I'd buy sea side property here in Utah on that. Incompetence you can draw your own conclusion on your respective representatives. So the problem may be neither corruption or incompetence and in one word in your conclusion, the blind. Will-full ignorance on the part of the electorate that is supposed to covering our asses is a dam sure fire way to burn the country around you as well.
Apparently looking up for answers and not doing what we've done for the past hundred years with civil disobedience and going hand in hand (with prayers mind you) solves nothing. /sarc
That or act(s) of civil disobedience to said kings ends up in a declaration of independence. Laws be damned, a great man once said, "You can not have a democracy without civil disobedience."
On the post: Capcom's Resident Evil DRM Is Evil: You Get To Play The Game Once And That's It
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
You tell someone not to do something it's the first dam thing there going to do. Freedom doesn't come from prohibition, or have we learned nothing in 200 years?
On the post: Can Google+ Succeed Merely By Being Not Facebook?
On the post: District Attorney Dismisses Charges Against Woman Who Filmed Cops
On the post: Two Reporters Arrested For Daring To Photograph/Videotape Public DC Taxi Commission Meeting
On the post: Capcom's Resident Evil DRM Is Evil: You Get To Play The Game Once And That's It
Oh and before I get a reply on laziness. Nah, If i go I wont return.
On the post: Telstra Having Second Thoughts Over Censorship Plan; Fears Reprisals From Hactivists
Mike?
You want to get in the grit of it Mike? A great man once said you cannot have freedom without civil disobedience. Next time the hypothetical comes to mind such as if = dislike of something first ask the end result. Was it intended? Is this what this group set out to do?
If you so dam worried about when the results are finished what happens to this group of skills. How about government (or those sponsoring it) fearing the people as any freedom based culture requires.
Lulzsec, in my opinion, is needed in this day and age. Need an example? Ever realize you've writ cognitive dissonance more this past month then I care to recall in 8 odd years.
On the post: Supreme Court Says Anti-Violent Video Game Law Violates The First Amendment
Wonder if it this will get traction again in the world of copyright though. As the world turns.
On the post: Woman Charged With 'Obstructing Governmental Administration' For Filming Police From Her Front Yard
On the post: Collateral Damage: In The Hunt For LulzSec, FBI Takes Down A Bunch Of Websites
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: MPAA Directly Lobbies Law Enforcement To Be Its Own Private Police Force
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Senators Want To Put People In Jail For Embedding YouTube Videos
Re: Mike's irresponsible, outrageous falsehoods
On the post: Return To The Days Of Hoover's Enemy List? FBI Raiding Activists As Terrorists
Re: Re: Re: Re: New word, same treatment
On the post: Return To The Days Of Hoover's Enemy List? FBI Raiding Activists As Terrorists
Re: Re: Re: Re: New word, same treatment
On the post: Peanuts Rights Holder Shuts Down Peanutweeter, Pisses Off Fans For No Reason At All
On the post: Senators Unconcerned About Massive Unintended Consequences Of Criminalizing People For Embedding YouTube Videos
Re: Not corruption or incompetence
Not corruption? I'd buy sea side property here in Utah on that. Incompetence you can draw your own conclusion on your respective representatives. So the problem may be neither corruption or incompetence and in one word in your conclusion, the blind. Will-full ignorance on the part of the electorate that is supposed to covering our asses is a dam sure fire way to burn the country around you as well.
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Typical
On the post: Senators Unconcerned About Massive Unintended Consequences Of Criminalizing People For Embedding YouTube Videos
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Senators Want To Put People In Jail For Embedding YouTube Videos
Re:
Apparently looking up for answers and not doing what we've done for the past hundred years with civil disobedience and going hand in hand (with prayers mind you) solves nothing. /sarc
The hiding under a rock is just classic lulz.
On the post: Senators Unconcerned About Massive Unintended Consequences Of Criminalizing People For Embedding YouTube Videos
Re: Re: Re: Quick and Easy Fix
On the post: Senators Unconcerned About Massive Unintended Consequences Of Criminalizing People For Embedding YouTube Videos
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Next >>