That implies they actually still have evidence that might be useful in discovery motions.. If they keep saying it was stolen they can deny knowing what was in it and that they have it still.
Denial.. It's the first step in becoming a politician/idiot/shrill
Also Id be very hard pressed to acknowledge the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of State and Office of Foreign Asset Control when you are dealing with Coursera MOOCs run by NON US Universities and Educational Institutions..
I'm ABSOLUTELY positive the Australian, Hong Kong, UK, Israel (maybe), German, and other worldwide Uni's would be very concerned and would basically be willing (if not mandated) too supplying these Free short courses to these countries.. Especially Cuba where no-one other than the idiot USA actually sanctions them.
An easy fix for this is for someone NOT in the USA to copy every single item on the coursera MOOCs in question and allow them to be assessed by Cuba et.al outside of the USA..
I think I'll do that for every one Ive done and am currently doing.. for example the current "Constitutional Law" MOOC by by Akhil Reed Amar of Yale Uni
I mean how dare these foreigners (Myself included) elarn about American law and doctrines.. The horror, the fear of actual democratic principles being adopted outside of the Undemocratic USA...
Prostitution and more importantly Escort agencies that are fully regulated by the Government are quite legal in a LOT of EU countries as well as Australia and New Zealand..
But hey it's unlawful in the USofA so it must be STOPPED!!! with force and much banging of drums etc etc yadda yadda by idiot American buffoons whenever they get their sexually repressed knickers in a twist
Becasue most recruitment companies (and by extension Big firms) use the MS certification as a way to thin the herd of applicants.
The MS certification has no meaning in the grand scheme of things at all and is basically next to useless, especially since it has to be renewed often (read as "pay MS more money for a piece of useless paper")
A better example of certification though (and ones that would probably suffice for both John and mason) would be CISCO certifications on networking (Generic for networks) and/or SANS certifications for Security protocols etc.
otherwise it's going to be read as just a load of blargha flargha... wait on second reading of your dribble it is just a load of Blargha flargha derpness.
Seeing as how Google also admits and states unequivocally how it adheres to numerous Self-Regulatory frameworks ( https://www.google.co.uk/intl/en/policies/privacy/frameworks/ ) as well as doing actual commerce in trade within the member countries of these agreements (ie: UK in this instance) then Google Inc like any other organisation can and always will be liable to any statutory regulations, laws, etc within that jurisdiction.
The USA requires it for companies doing business with it's citizens, as does every other country for the last 100 yrs under reciprocity and specific consumer, trade, privacy, tax, etc laws.
As Apple, IBM, and even McDonalds (to name a few) have found out within places like Australia (and the UK is no different) ... the courts have always stated that if you do not want to abide by the laws of the country you are within (and being on the Internet is irrelevant) DO NOT DO BUSINESS THERE!
Their lawyer, Karen Vernon, has argued that five of the seven charges against her clients should be thrown out because the evidence does not support the allegations against them.
Does this mean that the other two charges they are making admissions too? *snorts*
Actually this is pure theater on behalf of Ms Vernon who is a standard Local Court Solicitor.
Also it's not actually a Judge in charge here but instead is a Magistrate and most likely is NOT in front of a standard jury. Only in District and Above courts are there Judges in Aust. In fact this is most likely a committal mention to see if it should be sent up to the District Court (or higher in Western Australia) for trial in front of a Jury.
Also it's of note to know that Tasers are classified as "less-lethal weapons" and not Non-lethal weapons in Western Australia, which is highly significant for this case where the LEO's have also been stripped of their Qualified Immunity.
it's not ENFORCING a law since it is NOT an officially authorised devise for law enforcement purposes. And I am using authorised in the full legal definition and interpretation.
You are conflating "law enforcement" with "civil enforcement of property and/or personal rights" they are TOTALLY different.
If there was any doubt to what 'authorised' means then yes there might be ambiguities you could deal with within court, but as the law states there is absolutely no ambiguity with what is and what is not authorised. That's the whole problem with the thing.
So you are saying that it is entirely incidental that you filmed a criminal act on the camera thats dual purpose is 1 - to have evidence of any untoward acts happening where the camera is facing; 2 - for the psychological deterrence of those acts by the physical presence of the camera in the first place.
On the post: Judge Slams Prenda And Paul Duffy; Calls Them Out For Lying And 'Duplicitous Behavior'
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l82ajkXpht1qzufnjo1_500.jpg
On the post: Canadian Gov't Responds To Spying Revelations By Saying It's All A Lie And Calling Glenn Greenwald A 'Porn Spy'
Re:
That implies they actually still have evidence that might be useful in discovery motions.. If they keep saying it was stolen they can deny knowing what was in it and that they have it still.
Denial.. It's the first step in becoming a politician/idiot/shrill
On the post: Canadian Gov't Responds To Spying Revelations By Saying It's All A Lie And Calling Glenn Greenwald A 'Porn Spy'
Re: ♫ ♩ ♬ ♪
On the post: Canadian Gov't Responds To Spying Revelations By Saying It's All A Lie And Calling Glenn Greenwald A 'Porn Spy'
Re: Re:
All I'm getting from your statement is "Flargga blargha.. I'm a honmophobic idiot of massive proportions.. Blarghha Flarggha"
YMMV
On the post: United States Sanctions On Exporting Open Online Learning Courses Are Completely Backwards
I'm ABSOLUTELY positive the Australian, Hong Kong, UK, Israel (maybe), German, and other worldwide Uni's would be very concerned and would basically be willing (if not mandated) too supplying these Free short courses to these countries.. Especially Cuba where no-one other than the idiot USA actually sanctions them.
On the post: United States Sanctions On Exporting Open Online Learning Courses Are Completely Backwards
I think I'll do that for every one Ive done and am currently doing.. for example the current "Constitutional Law" MOOC by by Akhil Reed Amar of Yale Uni
I mean how dare these foreigners (Myself included) elarn about American law and doctrines.. The horror, the fear of actual democratic principles being adopted outside of the Undemocratic USA...
Fuck EM!
On the post: Congressional Moral Panic Over The Fact That Prostitutes Now Use Twitter
Re: Hang on a mo...
But hey it's unlawful in the USofA so it must be STOPPED!!! with force and much banging of drums etc etc yadda yadda by idiot American buffoons whenever they get their sexually repressed knickers in a twist
On the post: California Cracking Down On Coding Bootcamps For Teaching Coding Without A License
Re: Re: A better idea
The MS certification has no meaning in the grand scheme of things at all and is basically next to useless, especially since it has to be renewed often (read as "pay MS more money for a piece of useless paper")
A better example of certification though (and ones that would probably suffice for both John and mason) would be CISCO certifications on networking (Generic for networks) and/or SANS certifications for Security protocols etc.
On the post: T-Mobile Writes The Best Press Release You'll Ever See From A Phone Company
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Newcastle Might Win The S**** B*** Ad Championship With An Ad It Didn't Make And Can't Afford To Buy
Re: Re: Re:
And I think of said it here before too.
oh yeah
Here
and my best by far boput the nancy boy game is Here
o_O
On the post: Prince Sues 22 Fans For $1 Million Each For Linking To Bootlegs In Laughably Confused Complaint
Personally I'd pay good money to see Prince (or whatever he's calling himself these days) slapped senseless
On the post: NSA Interception In Action? Tor Developer's Computer Gets Mysteriously Re-Routed To Virginia
Re: Re: Solution: Burn the computer and get another from a safe vendor
Use them.
otherwise it's going to be read as just a load of blargha flargha... wait on second reading of your dribble it is just a load of Blargha flargha derpness.
On the post: British Judge Rules Google Can Be Sued In UK Over Privacy Case
The USA requires it for companies doing business with it's citizens, as does every other country for the last 100 yrs under reciprocity and specific consumer, trade, privacy, tax, etc laws.
As Apple, IBM, and even McDonalds (to name a few) have found out within places like Australia (and the UK is no different) ... the courts have always stated that if you do not want to abide by the laws of the country you are within (and being on the Internet is irrelevant) DO NOT DO BUSINESS THERE!
On the post: Candy Crush Goes Trademark Legal; Candy Crush Gets Trolled
Re: Ever notice that anomalies never end? So long as are lawyers...
Very true and I'm impressed since its a great self reflection on your part..
Why?
Because your an anomaly that keeps going and going and going with all the provable bogus crap and never learns!
Kudos to you for taking the first step towards intelligent discourse
On the post: Police Officers' Lawyer Claims Being Tased Is Hilarious
Smokes and Mirrors
Does this mean that the other two charges they are making admissions too? *snorts*
Actually this is pure theater on behalf of Ms Vernon who is a standard Local Court Solicitor.
Also it's not actually a Judge in charge here but instead is a Magistrate and most likely is NOT in front of a standard jury. Only in District and Above courts are there Judges in Aust. In fact this is most likely a committal mention to see if it should be sent up to the District Court (or higher in Western Australia) for trial in front of a Jury.
Also it's of note to know that Tasers are classified as "less-lethal weapons" and not Non-lethal weapons in Western Australia, which is highly significant for this case where the LEO's have also been stripped of their Qualified Immunity.
On the post: Man Subjected To Multiple Rectal Searches And Enemas By Police Officers Receives $1.6 Million Settlement
Re: Re: Re:
at least give him 2 lollipops ;)
On the post: Empire State Building Supposedly Sues Photographer Over Photograph Of Topless Woman
Re:
Hands you a pinch/grain of salt
On the post: Empire State Building Supposedly Sues Photographer Over Photograph Of Topless Woman
Nowadays it's just a place for Gorilla's, RomCom Movies and Boobs...
Wouldn't you be a bit pissed? people are mistaking you for California
;)
On the post: South Carolina Senator Aims To Criminalize The Recording Of Criminal Activity
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
You are conflating "law enforcement" with "civil enforcement of property and/or personal rights" they are TOTALLY different.
If there was any doubt to what 'authorised' means then yes there might be ambiguities you could deal with within court, but as the law states there is absolutely no ambiguity with what is and what is not authorised. That's the whole problem with the thing.
On the post: South Carolina Senator Aims To Criminalize The Recording Of Criminal Activity
Re: Re: Re: Re:
uhuh
Next >>