Once I purchase your MP3 you believe you can come get it back just because you have decided you don't want me to have it anymore?
ans : no I said agreed tp before purchase. Read carefully before you click here OR before downloading my song. I can say LIMITED USe.
Software does it all the time. Free to use for 30 days , after you got to buy or give back.
=====================
You need to learn to give people a reason to buy, not rent.
ans : Again my choice. You can and often do rent art. Song used in adv for example. It is not lifetime use , if you use my song in a an adv.
===============================
By the way how much are you giving the Beatles from licensing Revolution (free download no less).
ANS: The key word is FREE. If I have been charging $$, paul and Yoko could Sue me.
I have been meaning to write Paul, Yoko, Oliva and Ringo about that, and get permission, but I am too busy here.
But I once played "I shall Be Released" for Rick Danko , many moons ago, in a bar gig of mine .
Rick did not ask for his 25 cents.
He instead gave a fist pump , went "whooo-- whooo", and drank some more beer.
===============================================
You did legally license it right? Oh yeah, 10 years have gone by, how about putting up some new music.
Once I purchase your MP3 you believe you can come get it back just because you have decided you don't want me to have it anymore?
ans : no I said agreed tp before purchase. Read carefully brefore tou click here of before downloading my song. I can say LIMITED USe. Software does it all the time. Free to use for 30 days , after you got to buy or give back.
You need to learn to give people a reason to buy, not rent.
ans : Again my choice. You can and often do rent art. Song used in adv for example. It is not lifetime use , if you use my song in a an adv.
By the way how much are you giving the Beatles from licensing Revolution (free download no less).
ANS: The key word is FREE. If I have been charging $$, paul and Yoko could Sue me.
. I have been meaning to write Paul, Yoko, Oliva and Ringo about that, and get permission, but I am too busy here.
But I once played "I shall Be Released" for Rick Danko , many moons ago, in a bar gig of mine .
Rick did not ask for his 25 cents.
He instead gave a fist pump , went "whooo-- whooo", and drank some more beer.
You did legally license it right? Oh yeah, 10 years have gone by, how about putting up some new music.
Re: Re: I could try to pull all the documents I've found on the subject, but since I don't think anyone on Techdirt is going to actually work on this project, I won't bother.
thanks , i got them ,, just want to here publicly acknowledge your good work.
thanks a gain.
Re: "aftermarket creation" ? Re: But the "market post-creation" was non-existent.
or maybe :
Top Billionaire Investor Says Market Will Crash Soon
... investor Pre profitable this accredited amateur investor The how achieve ***post market creation***** and investor relations audit and 'C' executives' just few ... www.tradeztr.com/.../top-billionaire-investor-says-market-will-crash-soon
I could try to pull all the documents I've found on the subject, but since I don't think anyone on Techdirt is going to actually work on this project, I won't bother.
I would love to read them !!
If you click around , starting with my profile , you can find out my email in a few clicks. (others here have, I even get flame now in my private email).
But yes please do sent me what you got !!!!!! http://technopoliticalscience.blogspot.com/
(the blog is only an academic hobby , and takes no comments or ads, but with a few clicks you find my contact info.)
On the post: Lady Gaga Says No Problem If People Download Her Music; The Money Is In Touring
Re: Re: cleare : re Beatles Revolution// So I could purchase your download, and then give it away to everyone for free, and that's okay?
NO .
If you record or purchase you CANNOT make copies to give or sale w/o me saying so in writing , signed by me & creepy lawyer types.
It is at my choosing when and to whom to apply that RIGHT.
I can let you , but not someone else. Depends on the use.
A donation to a charity for example.
Artist donate art for charity auction et, al.,,, all the time ,,, & musicans Albums , and performances.
On the post: Lady Gaga Says No Problem If People Download Her Music; The Money Is In Touring
Re: Re: cleare : re Beatles Revolution / It's irrelevant whether you're giving it away for free, they could still sue you.
Very True.
I was hoping to trick Paul into to coming to my house to get his quarter.
REally !!!!!!
Any time Paul. I can even leave in the mailbox for you.
---
But if it becaume every serious money or publicity I got for my cover -- Paul & Yoko --(Love ya' guys!)--- get $$$.
( Or really who ever owns it now ,, I am confused ,, is not the M.J. estate anymore?? Is it ? He went bankrupt.
Where do I send my 25 cents ,, some one please tell me !!?!?! )
On the post: Lady Gaga Says No Problem If People Download Her Music; The Money Is In Touring
Re: Re: Point of Information.2) What about Fair Use? Doesn't that limit what control you have?
If you got a ?? for me ,, can you hold til this evening ?
,, I will be back .
Post ,, but I will not reply for a while ,
, A little overload ,,
Mike's not paying me to be here .
On the post: Lady Gaga Says No Problem If People Download Her Music; The Money Is In Touring
cleare : re Beatles Revolution
ans : no I said agreed tp before purchase. Read carefully before you click here OR before downloading my song. I can say LIMITED USe.
Software does it all the time. Free to use for 30 days , after you got to buy or give back.
=====================
You need to learn to give people a reason to buy, not rent.
ans : Again my choice. You can and often do rent art. Song used in adv for example. It is not lifetime use , if you use my song in a an adv.
===============================
By the way how much are you giving the Beatles from licensing Revolution (free download no less).
ANS: The key word is FREE. If I have been charging $$, paul and Yoko could Sue me.
I have been meaning to write Paul, Yoko, Oliva and Ringo about that, and get permission, but I am too busy here.
But I once played "I shall Be Released" for Rick Danko , many moons ago, in a bar gig of mine .
Rick did not ask for his 25 cents.
He instead gave a fist pump , went "whooo-- whooo", and drank some more beer.
===============================================
You did legally license it right? Oh yeah, 10 years have gone by, how about putting up some new music.
ans: see above
==============================
On the post: Lady Gaga Says No Problem If People Download Her Music; The Money Is In Touring
ans : no I said agreed tp before purchase. Read carefully brefore tou click here of before downloading my song. I can say LIMITED USe. Software does it all the time. Free to use for 30 days , after you got to buy or give back.
You need to learn to give people a reason to buy, not rent.
ans : Again my choice. You can and often do rent art. Song used in adv for example. It is not lifetime use , if you use my song in a an adv.
By the way how much are you giving the Beatles from licensing Revolution (free download no less).
ANS: The key word is FREE. If I have been charging $$, paul and Yoko could Sue me.
. I have been meaning to write Paul, Yoko, Oliva and Ringo about that, and get permission, but I am too busy here.
But I once played "I shall Be Released" for Rick Danko , many moons ago, in a bar gig of mine .
Rick did not ask for his 25 cents.
He instead gave a fist pump , went "whooo-- whooo", and drank some more beer.
You did legally license it right? Oh yeah, 10 years have gone by, how about putting up some new music.
ans: see above
On the post: Lady Gaga Says No Problem If People Download Her Music; The Money Is In Touring
Re: 1) what is the difference between recording something that you are listening to/streaming online, and downloading a copy?
I was an Artistic choice not to post an "excerpt". of the song[s].
I felt the songs should be heard Whole and complete -- even down to the last reverb when i posted them @ MySpace.
On the post: Lady Gaga Says No Problem If People Download Her Music; The Money Is In Touring
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Lady Gaga Says No Problem If People Download Her Music; The Money Is In Touring
Re: Re:Actually she is a seriously good musician. ! Of Course !!
I dig it.
On the post: Lady Gaga Says No Problem If People Download Her Music; The Money Is In Touring
1) what is the difference between recording something that you are listening to/streaming online, and downloading a copy?
For Higher Quality .Wav ---
you gotta pay me.
On the post: Lady Gaga Says No Problem If People Download Her Music; The Money Is In Touring
Point of Information.
Ans: I figure if someone wants to take the trouble to record -- G-D Bless them !! Thank You.
2) Do you realize that your control over your copyrighted art is limited, not complete?
Ans: No. ( I know what I am saying , it is not meant to put you off.)
3) How do you feel about situations where someone is denied access to music they have legally purchased?
ANS: Example please. but it sounds bad at first bite.
But I can put a limtited time on your use.
I do have the right to withdraw my art,
and say you can no longer use it , if 1st stated by me before purchase , and agreed to by that purchase.
On the post: Lady Gaga Says No Problem If People Download Her Music; The Money Is In Touring
Mike , Point of Information.
I am just exherting free choice of Artistic Complete Legal Control over my COPYRIGHTED ART.
So is Miss GaGa.
Offered as a Point of Information.
Mike you now have the floor, sir.
-------------
Free to record music: http://www.myspace.com/radamhalperin
Pay to download:
http://amiestreet.com/music/rahalperin/rahalperin/
On the post: Could You Replace Copyrights And Patents With A Fairness-Based Legal Liability?
"but the book makes a very compelling argument that copyright law is a clear violation of First Amendment principles."
Like dividing by zero. Looks nice , but the court would spit it out , and tell you to get a real job.
Copyright Law was in the constitution before the 1st adment.
No one in legal history has ever raised this--- frankly because it is looney.
It does though , get discussed in political theory classes as an academic exercise.
On the post: Can Someone Explain Why Circumvention For Non-Infringing Purposes Is Illegal?
Mike , Really please explain : "The market post-creation, for lyrics. That was clear from the context. "
I Googled & yahooed and even Asked.
You owe me and your readers ,,,,,in all intellectual honestly & fairness ,,,,an explanation of what you mean by " market post-creation".
On the post: Amanda Palmer Talks About Record Labels, Art, Commerce & Retiring To Open A Juice Bar
Re: Re: ukulele
My parody of "honky tonk women" is there on uke.
and you ,,Amanda , can read my blog there for my uke history.
Would like to hear from you, and hear your uke album when it is done !!
On the post: Nice Work ASCAP: Convinces Yet Another Coffee Shop To Stop Promoting Local Bands
Re: Re: I could try to pull all the documents I've found on the subject, but since I don't think anyone on Techdirt is going to actually work on this project, I won't bother.
thanks a gain.
On the post: Amanda Palmer Talks About Record Labels, Art, Commerce & Retiring To Open A Juice Bar
popcorn
On the post: Amanda Palmer Talks About Record Labels, Art, Commerce & Retiring To Open A Juice Bar
Re: ukulele
Amanda ,, you are cool.
On the post: Can Someone Explain Why Circumvention For Non-Infringing Purposes Is Illegal?
Re: "aftermarket creation" ? Re: But the "market post-creation" was non-existent.
Top Billionaire Investor Says Market Will Crash Soon
... investor Pre profitable this accredited amateur investor The how achieve ***post market creation***** and investor relations audit and 'C' executives' just few ...
www.tradeztr.com/.../top-billionaire-investor-says-market-will-crash-soon
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22post-market+creation%22&hl=en&client=firefox-a&h s=Qs6&rlz=1R1GPMD_en___US361&filter=0
On the post: Can Someone Explain Why Circumvention For Non-Infringing Purposes Is Illegal?
"aftermarket creation" ? Re: But the "market post-creation" was non-existent.
It is an industrial term ,, but only mostly used by auto-motive collector types.
Even if what you meant "aftermarket creation" , I goota admit , I am still lost re: copyright & patent law/policy.
On the post: Nice Work ASCAP: Convinces Yet Another Coffee Shop To Stop Promoting Local Bands
I could try to pull all the documents I've found on the subject, but since I don't think anyone on Techdirt is going to actually work on this project, I won't bother.
If you click around , starting with my profile , you can find out my email in a few clicks. (others here have, I even get flame now in my private email).
But yes please do sent me what you got !!!!!!
http://technopoliticalscience.blogspot.com/
(the blog is only an academic hobby , and takes no comments or ads, but with a few clicks you find my contact info.)
Next >>