"Why is it so hard for the industry to have a discussion in public?"
Maybe because, if the discussion was held in public, the content producers might actually see how much they were getting shafted.
Or maybe it's because the **AA doesn't WANT to change, and is trying to negotiate their way back to 1990, before the world changed.
Or maybe it's because a public discussion might make people see how much of the pain in getting anything done is caused by parasitic entities trying to justify their own existence.
Do content producers *really* need the **AA to produce great art? or is it just easier to put up with them than it is to go it alone?
Seriously - the only reasons that I can see for voting for this bill is either total dumbfounding ignorance, or to get the $upport of the entertainment industries.
I see something like this, it makes me want to watch the movie "Thank You for Smoking" again. They can say these things, but it's up to elected representatives to resist the urge (lobbying $$$) to capitulate to them. Canada has had mandatory health warnings for years now - cigarettes still sell. (They are, admittedly, a lot uglier now, tho...)
Last time I checked, most of the affected schools were *universities*. Most of the students, therefore, are ADULTs, not children. Minor point, I admit, but it still bugged me.
I hate it when people cry "think of the children" unnecessarily.
To be clear, that wasn't a government body that banned the song - it was the broadcasters' self-regulatory body. The government body (the CRTC) wrote them a response after public outcry and told them to revisit the situation.
Maybe they want to wean folks off the DVD rental portion?
Let's see - moving bits from servers to users, minimal cost.
Moving disks from warehouse to users, high cost.
Getting disks back from users - somewhat unreliable.
Getting streamed data back from users - not needed.
Maybe Netflix wants to get out of the business of shipping plastic disks all over the US, and are trying to split the two features, so that they can alter the price of that component without affecting the critical mass of streaming customers. (After all, I can't help but think that any business that revolves around moving data from place to place on shiny plastic disks is doomed in the long run.)
"I don't think anyone can come up with a valid music business model that has as many dollars in it as the music industry does today."
Even if there isn't a new business model that has as many dollars in it, the model they're using right now is fast disappearing. They can choose to stay on the sinking ship, or to get onto the lifeboats and survive. Raging about how they want to go back to 1990, when things were wonderful for them, isn't going to change the fact that their distribution business is NOT needed by consumers any more.
They used to have the monopoly on recording studios, but albums are now being cut in bedrooms, with cheap, high quality equipment. They used to have a monopoly on pressing LPs, but now anybody can make a CD in their home computer. They used to have a monopoly on distribution of plastic disks, but now there's a network and a format the remove that need.
The future of the music business is content recommendation and identification - not in distribution or production. The market has already solved those problems.
Love the irony - in fact, it's far easier for Canadian companies to open branches in the US than it is to deliver over the border, too. Customs and licensing is a pain for goods going both ways.
That being said, it's completely within the rights of every country to impose whatever rules they feel necessary/desirable on imports. And it's within the rights of every company to license their goods using whatever criteria they feel will best benefit their bottom line. No matter how stupid it seems to the rest of us. :)
"The vast majority of major newspapers are NOT free."
What's your point?
Ads pay for much of the cost newspaper production and distribution.
Subscription pays for part of newspaper production and distribution.
I don't see too many newspapers that are ad free.
I see tons of examples of newspapers that are subscription free.
Which one do YOU think provides more money?
Adapt or die - that's the choices facing the NY Times, WaPo, and the Toronto Sun. (However, I would only miss two of the three of these - guess which ones!)
On the post: Couple Arrested For Dancing On NYC Subway Platform
Re: I'm not saying it was aliens, but...
On the post: Hollywood & The RIAA Won't Let Tech Save Them
Maybe because, if the discussion was held in public, the content producers might actually see how much they were getting shafted.
Or maybe it's because the **AA doesn't WANT to change, and is trying to negotiate their way back to 1990, before the world changed.
Or maybe it's because a public discussion might make people see how much of the pain in getting anything done is caused by parasitic entities trying to justify their own existence.
Do content producers *really* need the **AA to produce great art? or is it just easier to put up with them than it is to go it alone?
On the post: Hollywood & The RIAA Won't Let Tech Save Them
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: As SOPA/PIPA Becomes Toxic, Frantic Congress Test Runs Dropping DNS Blocking Provisions
Re:
And if they don't pass the laws that their contributors want, how will they justify asking for more donations next campaign cycle?
And if they don't have the contributions, how can they tell the folks in their district how much they got done for them?
And if they don't tell people how great they are, how will they ever get re-elected?
Hmmmm - I think we have a problem here...
On the post: Poll Suggests Americans Of All Ages, Political Positions, Locations... All Hate SOPA
What SOPA actually stands for...
Seriously - the only reasons that I can see for voting for this bill is either total dumbfounding ignorance, or to get the $upport of the entertainment industries.
On the post: Tobacco Companies Think Their Trademarks Are More Important Than Your Health
Re: Re:
Yes - because EVERYTHING is black or white.
Polarization sucks!
On the post: Tobacco Companies Think Their Trademarks Are More Important Than Your Health
Every time...
On the post: Can The NYPD Back Up Its Claim Of A Confrontation That Required Pepper Spray, Despite More Video Evidence?
Re: Re: Re: Re: The thin blue line
On the post: Can The NYPD Back Up Its Claim Of A Confrontation That Required Pepper Spray, Despite More Video Evidence?
Re: Re: Re: The thin blue line
We don't NEED no Stinkin' BADGES!!!!
On the post: Access Copyright Admits That It's Holding Education Hostage Unless Universities Pay Up
Children? What children?
I hate it when people cry "think of the children" unnecessarily.
On the post: Canadian Officials Censoring Scientists Whose Results They Don't Like
Re: Just another day at the scientific office
It's called the preponderance of evidence.
And besides, the best solution to bad speech is more good speech.
On the post: Canadian Officials Censoring Scientists Whose Results They Don't Like
Re:
To be clear, that wasn't a government body that banned the song - it was the broadcasters' self-regulatory body. The government body (the CRTC) wrote them a response after public outcry and told them to revisit the situation.
On the post: Writer Explains How Copyright Has Prevented Her From Ever Seeing TV Shows She Wrote
Re: Re:
;-)
On the post: Killing The Golden Goose: Is Hollywood To Blame For Netflix's Poorly Thought Out Massive Price Hike?
Maybe they want to wean folks off the DVD rental portion?
Moving disks from warehouse to users, high cost.
Getting disks back from users - somewhat unreliable.
Getting streamed data back from users - not needed.
Maybe Netflix wants to get out of the business of shipping plastic disks all over the US, and are trying to split the two features, so that they can alter the price of that component without affecting the critical mass of streaming customers. (After all, I can't help but think that any business that revolves around moving data from place to place on shiny plastic disks is doomed in the long run.)
On the post: Can You Support An Entire Recording Industry By Shaking Down Music Fans?
Re: Re: Re:
Even if there isn't a new business model that has as many dollars in it, the model they're using right now is fast disappearing. They can choose to stay on the sinking ship, or to get onto the lifeboats and survive. Raging about how they want to go back to 1990, when things were wonderful for them, isn't going to change the fact that their distribution business is NOT needed by consumers any more.
They used to have the monopoly on recording studios, but albums are now being cut in bedrooms, with cheap, high quality equipment. They used to have a monopoly on pressing LPs, but now anybody can make a CD in their home computer. They used to have a monopoly on distribution of plastic disks, but now there's a network and a format the remove that need.
The future of the music business is content recommendation and identification - not in distribution or production. The market has already solved those problems.
On the post: Police Claim That Allowing People To Film Them In Public Creates 'Chilling Effects'
Re: tips
If a police officer is intimidated by having a camera pointed at them, perhaps they aren't suited to being a police officer.
On the post: Homeland Security Says They Could Strip Search Every Airline Passenger If They Wanted To
Re: Re: How far is too far?
On the post: Zappos Gives Up On Canada Due To Customs Problems
Re: Re:
That being said, it's completely within the rights of every country to impose whatever rules they feel necessary/desirable on imports. And it's within the rights of every company to license their goods using whatever criteria they feel will best benefit their bottom line. No matter how stupid it seems to the rest of us. :)
On the post: It Took The NY Times 14 Months And $40 Million Dollars To Build The World's Stupidest Paywall?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
What's your point?
Ads pay for much of the cost newspaper production and distribution.
Subscription pays for part of newspaper production and distribution.
I don't see too many newspapers that are ad free.
I see tons of examples of newspapers that are subscription free.
Which one do YOU think provides more money?
Adapt or die - that's the choices facing the NY Times, WaPo, and the Toronto Sun. (However, I would only miss two of the three of these - guess which ones!)
On the post: It Took The NY Times 14 Months And $40 Million Dollars To Build The World's Stupidest Paywall?
Re: Re: Re:
Funny - I picked up a copy of Eye Weekly in Toronto today. Cost me nothing. AFAIK, it has never cost the reader anything.
Lots of ads inside, though - wonder how they're getting paid...
Next >>