As SOPA/PIPA Becomes Toxic, Frantic Congress Test Runs Dropping DNS Blocking Provisions
from the scurry-scurry dept
Well, well, well. It looks like some in DC are starting to get the message that there is real concern with SOPA/PIPA. The latest is that the fact that SOPA/PIPA support is becoming "toxic" is starting to make the press. In response to that, plus significant pressure from those within the government who are concerned about online security issues... the folks behind both SOPA/PIPA are doing some trial running of finding out how people would respond if they just completely dropped the DNS/site blocking aspects from the two bills. The goal is to get the tech industry to "stop opposing" the bills (if not actually support them). Clearly, the opposition is having a pretty big impact, and we're hearing that some of the "pressure" to "fix" these bills is coming from pretty high places. Separately, even with the House Oversight Committee hearings scheduled for next Wednesday, it sounds like Lamar Smith has decided he wants to restart the SOPA markup on the same day (perhaps with a new version of SOPA... sans DNS/site blocking).Of course, while taking out DNS blocking fixes one problem with these bills, it still leaves in place a ton of other problems. Of course, supporters of the bill will falsely claim that taking out DNS/site blocking "fixes all the complaints!" That ignores that this is exactly what they said about the last "manager's amendment" version as well. They figure if they just keep claiming that they responded to all the complaints, maybe people will believe them. But that's ridiculous. The bills still have the super broad immunity provisions that will encourage all sorts of content/site takedowns to avoid liability. On top of that, many of the definitions in both bills remain ridiculously vague and would likely lead to overblocking in other ways -- that is, things like "information location tools" having to block links to sites deemed rogue under the legislation would remain. Also, the anti-circumvention measures remain in the bill (and are not limited to just foreign sites), which is going to continue to create a huge headache for the State Department, which is funding the creation of many such circumvention tools for foreign regimes... even though offering them in the US would be a violation under the bill! On top of that, both bills still include the private right to action, which will lead to numerous unnecessary lawsuits.
The takeaway here: the growing momentum against these bills is having a big, big impact in DC, and it's forced the bills' main backers to go back to the well to see if they can find at least something to compromise on. Taking out the DNS stuff will piss off Hollywood... no doubt, but it hardly solves many of the bigger problems in the bill. Don't be fooled. No one's fixing the bill (hell, it's not clear there's anything that will fix this bill, because no one's shown why this particular bill is needed!). They're simply taking out one provision that is especially bad... while leaving in a ton of other stuff.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: congress, dns, pipa, protect ip, sopa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
They're still not getting the message
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's hilarious that you post this directly above an article suggesting that "the entertainment industry is dying."
You are truly a buffoon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Trollffoon?
Would be an F, but I don't like flunking students.
Please try harder. Seek to be coherent and persuasive.
With time and practice, I'm sure you'll get the hang of it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Trollffoon?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If you are not trolling, we expect much more in this comment section when it comes to proving/disproving statements. Please review older conversation threads and see where people
succeeded and failed to stir the intellectual pot. When you feel you have grasped the concepts, feel free to post a comment that does not make it seem like you are an obnoxious teenager seeking attention/approval from the Net as a whole.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You are truly a buffoon."
Funny, the caption reads "Somebody forgot to tell reality that the entertainment industry is dying."
You're truly not only a buffoon, you're an illiterate buffoon, boy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Maybe if we changed the title to Putting To Rest The Myth That The Entertainment Industry Was Dying. it might make it easier to understand?
(or, as someone behind me just said, "Damn, English is my 4th language and I got it. It reading comprehension that much of an issue in this country?")
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Reading comprehension AND critical thinking, unfortunately. There are still folks around here that believe the world is 6,000 years old and that Jesus had a pet dinosaur but they died off due to over-hunting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Some guys on an island figured out a way to bring them back using DNA from a mosquito trapped in petrified sap, but it didn't turn out too good for them. I heard the dinosaurs even ate the lawyer.
Plus, the most dangerous animals in the wild tend to be the herbivores. More people are killed by Rhinos than by Lions. That dinosaur you can ride to work might trample you. Then again, I want my flying car even though that could be just as dangerous.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Are they the most dangerous, or just the most numerous?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Well, considering that Hippos are considered more dangerous than both, I am not sure.
However, Rhinos are considered critically endangered, while Lions are only endangered. According to Wikipedia, there are between 16,500 and 47,000 Lions in 2002-2004, while Rhinos are listed as mostly extinct in the wild, so I'd bet Lions are more numerous than Rhinos.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
However, Rhinos are considered critically endangered, while Lions are only endangered. According to Wikipedia, there are between 16,500 and 47,000 Lions in 2002-2004, while Rhinos are listed as mostly extinct in the wild, so I'd bet Lions are more numerous than Rhinos.
Just one of the amazing things you can learn reading TechDirt. :-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
read the previous few words "nobody told reality"
You are truly a buffoon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"Apparently, Someone Forgot To Tell Reality That The Entertainment Industry Was Dying".
What is in the article, if you care to use up two minutes of your life, is that the entertainment industry says its dying, that its losing jobs.
Whereas a study from a government funded labour agency says the COMPLETE OPPOSITE. That jobs are GROWING.
For fuck's sake, just...what is it with you trolls? If you want to be on the opposite side of the fence, at least MAKE A FUCKING EFFORT! Don't just completely mis-read the headline and not read the article.
Let me spell it out for you. The one reason above all others why we Techdirtians don't take you seriously is because you rush to make a comment, without any citations or proof, often including a personal attack. You, my good sir, are the buffoon here, for showing to the world that you are lazy, incompetent, and vitriolic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Jan 11th, 2012 @ 10:59am
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dear Congress:
Examine closely the FRICKING HUGE body of laws which you've already shoved upon us--and take the time to revise/correct/remove those laws.
Once you've learned to take care of your toys, er, laws then you can have new ones. But not until then.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Dear Congress:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I really think Lobo has the right idea though. They need to start cleaning up the old laws, toss out the ones no longer needed and fix those that are being abused. THEN they can go back to thinking about new ones.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I call dibs on energy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I call dibs on energy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And if they don't pass the laws that their contributors want, how will they justify asking for more donations next campaign cycle?
And if they don't have the contributions, how can they tell the folks in their district how much they got done for them?
And if they don't tell people how great they are, how will they ever get re-elected?
Hmmmm - I think we have a problem here...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The best that can be hoped for in those circumstances is that we can persuade people to take out the very stupidest things, while passing legislation of just mind numbing stupidity.
For the situation to improve, IP reformers or IP abolitionists need to make the running on legislation, until that happens the legislation that gets passed will just get worse and worse.
viz last 10-15 years
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
point of no return
The counter-tactic is almost as old: when you catch a thief, you don't just make him give back some of what he stole. At the very least he has to give it all back, and then you either lock him up, flog him or hang him, depending on your circumstances.
It took a great deal of effort to bring this much pressure to bear, millions of hours of work by people who had other things to do. Those responsible should not get away with 90% of what they wanted. Political careers should end over this, companies should take losses they won't recoup for years, if ever. When the next battle in this war comes, all those asked to lead the charge for SOPA-2 should know that it could cost them very dearly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There is no need to fix the bills
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Personally, with Google and the other tech companies getting in the lobbying game I wouldn't be surprised to find that the next war over online censorship doesn't happen at all. The tech giant's next move should be to get the internet as a whole protected under the First Amendement so that something like this can't happen again (with provisions of course. Child Pornography isn't an art form dammit).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It already is, in theory, just not in practice. The only way to bring about what you suggest is to get a good ruling in a "People v. Internet" case, preferably from the Supreme Court. Any idea how to make that happen?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The entertainment industry is a piece of lying krap and they are not dying or even hurting.They are making tons of money and if you trolls could read or had half a brain you could of learned this by looking at our Government Public Information.
Any Bill that opens up the door of censorship is wrong.I will not support any Bill that does this.I will fight it and fight back for freedom.
SOPA/PIPA = WAR
Millions of tech literates will be looking out for you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: gorehound on Jan 11th, 2012 @ 1:07pm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Vacation
The old monopolies are gatekeepers are losing out to the independents. Media creation has vastly increased due to the availability of new tools. The majority of people are just happy to share for other people's enjoyment. Independent artists use file sharing to promote themselves and to amass a fan base. All facts show that people are still happy to buy and convenience is a large factor.
So it is only the RIAA and MPAA who are running around screaming blue murder. They are seriously afraid of losing their monopoly which not only explains such laws but also explains why they attack independent channels like DaJaz1 and OnSmash.
Since media creation is doing great, since the old market is still making a good profit only subject to competition, since an Internet revolution is happening, then this is simply not the time or place to try enforcing harsh new market controls.
Have no doubt. SOPA and PIPA must die.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That being said, if they drop those provisions there won't be much point in sites like ourselves existing. :(
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Go Marsha!
�Critics of SOPA can�t deny the undisputed fact that piracy hurts America,� she said in an emailed statement. �The same radical left-wing special interests groups that advocated for Obama�s so-called net neutrality regulations are trying to hijack conservative principles and mislead the public about SOPA.
�The fact is SOPA only applies to dedicated foreign rogue sites that are harming American consumers and creators,� she added.
Someone needs to tell the guys at RED STATE that they are "left wing"...I dont think they've been given the memo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
dns just does not work like sopa/pipa wants
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Funny, before the bill was offered I heard an awful lot of sniveling about the government being a private police force. Now come the wailing about a private right of action. Let's be clear, it's actual you have a problem with.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wants to start same day
Of course he does last thing he wants is Issa and Chaffetz in there speaking out with the ammunition the NERDS give them or their proposed amendments being brought to the table.
Plan and simple he wants to avoid as much of the opposition as he can.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
SOPA etc.
Let's kill it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.change.org/petitions/congressrepresentatives-do-not-pass-the-sopa-sopa-bill
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]