I know I would prefer to use the TechDirt comment system as opposed to the ads. I use AdBlock instead of a hosts file so turning off ads on a specific page isn't that difficult for me. I'm just used to the TechDirt system and it makes more sense from my perspective to keep things consistent.
Also, artists do not have a "right" to compensation, only an opportunity. One that AC/DC is not taking full advantage of by refusing to offer what it is they're selling in a form their potential customers like.
Dude, all you have to do to debunk a negative claim is show positive evidence. If Mike is so wrong, it should be easy to find some evidence demonstrating the contrary.
I think the "first rights" idea comes into play as you get an established based going. If you've built up a fanbase, there's definitely merit in getting something first.
For example, if anybody can print the book after it's out, there's an advantage in being the first one out of the gate. You get the first mover advantage so that your books are the ones on the shelves, your cover art is recognized, and the others (while equally free to be made) look more like knockoffs. I think that might be a direction things are going, with publishers and labels competing for who gets first dibs on a new work as opposed to forcing the creator to give up all monopoly rights.
First also plays into the Kickstarter model, where donors or top-level contributors might get an early peak or advance copy of the book.
That if you're making art with the right mindset, you will start looking to provide reasons for potential customers to support you financially rather than demanding that you get a paycheck.
Sometimes that's as simple as putting out a quality product at a reasonable price. Other times it involves fun promotions (See: TF2 hats) or more risky experiments (See: Humble Indie Bundle). Regardless, somebody making art instead of "product" who would like to make money from it is in the same place with or without the so-called protections provided by copyright, and is better off ignoring them and simply focusing on creating great stuff people would be willing to buy.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Even if "Take it for free!" was written in bold, red letters...
I'm always puzzled when I see people saying this. I have a lot of respect for your opinions and posts here and you seem to have an excellent grasp of how things work and where they're going.
What precise benefit do you see of copyright that we cannot get without it? The things I see advocated here work just fine without government-granted monopolies, so why need them at all?
You don't get to choose the environment your business model is in. A business model that needs the government to step in and make it work is flawed. How about a model that works right now instead?
I think there's room in the MMO space for a model like this. It's potentially a way to take on WoW while still charging a monthly fee - give the client away so everybody tries it, then charge to continue playing or for extra features.
I guess some of the MMOs have switched to a model like this (LotRO, DnDO) and are doing pretty well.
Also, businesses don't get to simply "declare" a business model, and then have it work. If you business model is, "we've got to stop all this piracy first, and then our business model will work fine," you need a new model.
Let's work to build and adopt business models that work now, with things the way they are.
Indeed, it's a real trade-off. Either the class is too big or professors don't want to take the time to hand-grade written tests, so they go with multiple choice/Scantron formats. The best way to prepare for those kinds of tests is by going over old questions, which is what smart students are going to do.
This always bothers me. The point of school is to learn the material, not follow arbitrary rules set up by the professor. If doing something helps you learn the material better, it should be allowed - regardless of what the professor thinks.
On the post: Google's Fiber Makes MPAA Skittish. Why Does Hollywood See All Technology In Terms Of Piracy?
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Monkeys Don't Do Fair Use; News Agency Tells Techdirt To Remove Photos
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: DailyDirt: Hey Teacher, Leave Those Kids Alone!
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: We're Missing The Point Of The Cloud: It's Not Supposed To Be Locked To A Single Service
Re: Roll Your Own
On the post: AC/DC Says Their Songs Will Never Be Available For Download; Rest Of Internet Laughs
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: AC/DC
On the post: Canadians Ignore Ban On Tweeting Election Results
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Not Relying On Copyright Doesn't Mean You Don't Make Money
Re: Disagree
For example, if anybody can print the book after it's out, there's an advantage in being the first one out of the gate. You get the first mover advantage so that your books are the ones on the shelves, your cover art is recognized, and the others (while equally free to be made) look more like knockoffs. I think that might be a direction things are going, with publishers and labels competing for who gets first dibs on a new work as opposed to forcing the creator to give up all monopoly rights.
First also plays into the Kickstarter model, where donors or top-level contributors might get an early peak or advance copy of the book.
On the post: Incentivized Creation
Re: Re: Vs.
Sometimes that's as simple as putting out a quality product at a reasonable price. Other times it involves fun promotions (See: TF2 hats) or more risky experiments (See: Humble Indie Bundle). Regardless, somebody making art instead of "product" who would like to make money from it is in the same place with or without the so-called protections provided by copyright, and is better off ignoring them and simply focusing on creating great stuff people would be willing to buy.
On the post: Movie Studios Add Another Window: The $30 Dollar Rental
Re: Re: Re: Re: I have said it before
On the post: Sometimes It's Better To Just Let People Copy Your Content Than Deal With Licensing
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Even if "Take it for free!" was written in bold, red letters...
What precise benefit do you see of copyright that we cannot get without it? The things I see advocated here work just fine without government-granted monopolies, so why need them at all?
On the post: New Study: 70% Of People Find 'Piracy' Socially Acceptable [Updated]
Re: Re: Re: Makes Sense...
On the post: The Debate Over Copyright Gets Loud At Digital Music Forum
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Maybe Super Cheap Video Games Are Helping, Not Destroying, The Video Game Industry
Re: Re:
I guess some of the MMOs have switched to a model like this (LotRO, DnDO) and are doing pretty well.
On the post: The Return Of COICA; Because Censorship Is Cool Again
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Expendables Producers Begin Process Of Shaking Down Thousands For Cash
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Band Discovers Leaked Song... And Its Response Is To Release A Better Version For Free
Re:
On the post: Operation Payback And Wikileaks Show The Battle Lines Are About Distributed & Open vs. Centralized & Closed
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Singularity must be stopped at all costs!!
On the post: 200 Students Admit To 'Cheating' On Exam... But Bigger Question Is If It Was Really Cheating Or Studying
Re: Interesting way to test the students
On the post: 200 Students Admit To 'Cheating' On Exam... But Bigger Question Is If It Was Really Cheating Or Studying
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Creative Commons' Branding Confusion
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: One is worse
Next >>