They should put a surtax on registration of copyrights and only allow french registered copyright to utilize the service. If the copyright holders have to pay for the service then at least there will be accountability for it.
probably not, but i would figure they would have to show him the documents to get his input (ala the upload link that he only used to test, which was never published so anyone other then him could see).
you do realize you just made an argument for not granting extradition.
If NZ has similar laws and "crime" was committed by a citizen within his own country, there is no need to cart him off to another country to be prosecuted.
see i was thinking the issue with electronic documents was the conditions of bail. Didn't kimDot have a restriction against using computers as part of his bail conditions.
if they were complicit in the copyright infringement that action would void the safe harbor provision which means you would have no problem suing them into oblivion.
That fact that Viacom failed proves they are not complicit by the legal definition.
Which comes back to the same point why not just pay 37 billion and pocket the extra 213 billion.
"Equally, google could protect the sanctity of marriage by not linking to gay sites like disney and could prevent terrorism by removing links to all sites in foreign languages or hosted outside the US."
btw if you were being sarcastic "good one"
you really need to put the sarcasm sign link at the bottom of the post.
Jack Valenti complained about commercial skipping when he testified to congress.
"Now, what does that mean, Mr. Chairman? It means that when you are playing back a recording, which you made 2 days or whenever -- you are playing it back. You are sitting in your home in your easy chair and here comes the commercial and it is right in the middle of a Clint Eastwood film and you don't want to be interrupted. So, what do you do? You pop this beta scan and a 1-minute commercial disappears in 2 seconds."
if skipping commercials is a copyright infringement
does that mean taking down a site and therefore blocking distribution of content that want to be distributed by the site also a copyright infringement.
And if that is the case, doesn't that mean that the US government is guilty of willful infringement for taking the mega upload domain down.
Is BEIN similar guilty for demand domain blocking of the pirate bay.
except the financial harm arguement doesn't exist unless you ignore reality.
Advertisers don't pay for timeshifted ad runs. If you were to record your favorite show with a non commercial skipping vcr the advertiser would not pay for that ad viewing irregardless if you were a good boy and sat thru every commercial or if you simply hit the fast forward button.
So the economic loss is zero when compared to the fair use alternative that this product is designed to replace.
It only when you falsely allocate those views to non stubstitute (watching the show live) that you get a false economic loss.
(untitled comment)
(untitled comment)
Re: Re: Re:
So dan bull is basically giving lord censorship exactly what he wanted. Which in turn means that there is no infringement for THESE upload.
(untitled comment)
Re: Horse Hockey
Re: Re: Provisio Injuctis!
Re:
If NZ has similar laws and "crime" was committed by a citizen within his own country, there is no need to cart him off to another country to be prosecuted.
(untitled comment)
Re: Re: Re:
That fact that Viacom failed proves they are not complicit by the legal definition.
Which comes back to the same point why not just pay 37 billion and pocket the extra 213 billion.
Re:
btw if you were being sarcastic "good one"
you really need to put the sarcasm sign link at the bottom of the post.
Re:
then would 37 billion a year in cost be a good investment.
Why not pay Google 37 billion to setup such a system and pocket the extra 213 billion.
(untitled comment)
Re:
Jack Valenti complained about commercial skipping when he testified to congress.
"Now, what does that mean, Mr. Chairman? It means that when you are playing back a recording, which you made 2 days or whenever -- you are playing it back. You are sitting in your home in your easy chair and here comes the commercial and it is right in the middle of a Clint Eastwood film and you don't want to be interrupted. So, what do you do? You pop this beta scan and a 1-minute commercial disappears in 2 seconds."
(untitled comment)
does that mean taking down a site and therefore blocking distribution of content that want to be distributed by the site also a copyright infringement.
And if that is the case, doesn't that mean that the US government is guilty of willful infringement for taking the mega upload domain down.
Is BEIN similar guilty for demand domain blocking of the pirate bay.
Re: Re: Excuses
Advertisers don't pay for timeshifted ad runs. If you were to record your favorite show with a non commercial skipping vcr the advertiser would not pay for that ad viewing irregardless if you were a good boy and sat thru every commercial or if you simply hit the fast forward button.
So the economic loss is zero when compared to the fair use alternative that this product is designed to replace.
It only when you falsely allocate those views to non stubstitute (watching the show live) that you get a false economic loss.
in other news fox sues Swanson tv dinners for inducing infringement
An action that is designed to deny content producers their hard earned advertising income.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pirate Dan
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2009/12/artists-lawsuit-major-record-labels-are-the-real -pirates/
technically they took the stuff and didn't pay for it later too.
so by your standard we should never give another record company any change they want to copyright law forever because they screwed up once.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pirate Dan
Re: Maximalist absurdities.
http://www.badgroove.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Big-Bang-Theory-Leonards-sarcasm-sign.png
better title
More comments from fairusefriendly >>
fairusefriendly’s Submitted Stories.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt