Why NSA Boss Believes His Agency Is All Good: Intentions vs. Actions
from the getting-real dept
Tim Lee, over at The Switch, has a really good post explaining why it might be that NSA boss General Keith Alexander might legitimately believe some of the ridiculous propaganda his organization has been throwing around to try to justify the massive NSA dragnet surveillance programs and its widespread abuses. His argument is basically that people in powerful positions are in something of a bubble that limits their knowledge of how bad things are:The tendency to promote team players and marginalize dissenters creates a danger of groupthink at the highest levels of the organization. The problem is exacerbated by people’s reluctance to tell their bosses bad news. Each level of the bureaucracy gives its bosses a sugar-coated version of the information it receives from subordinates. By the time information reaches the top, it can be dramatically skewed.It's a good theory, and I'm sure there's some truth to it -- though I'm not sure it really explains everything. It does appear that Alexander was certainly aware of the audits, the IG report and the FISC ruling that all showed massive abuses and problems with the NSA's actions. So I'll posit an alternative theory as to why Alexander legitimately believes the propaganda.
This filtering process distorts the information powerful organizations receive from the outside, too. Powerful people are more likely to attend parties and give speeches with friendly audiences than hostile ones. An organization’s press office will naturally give preferential access to reporters who write positive stories about them. As a result, a man in Alexander’s position may rarely encounter well-informed critics who feel free to give him candid feedback on his performance.
There's a saying that I've heard many times with slight variations:
We judge ourselves by our intentions, but we judge others by their actions
A similar thing may be happening here with the NSA's surveillance. People like General Alexander (and James Clapper and Michael Hayden, and even President Obama) likely look at the things the NSA have done, and believe that they were being done with the best of intentions. That's why they immediately fall back on the defense that none of the abuses were intentional (even if some clearly were).
That's why they seem so exasperated that everyone's so upset with them for the massive spying and the abuses. They keep insisting that if we only were in their shoes, we'd be absolutely fine with how the NSA is acting, and they keep saying that no one at the NSA wants to abuse your civil liberties or to spy on your communications unless you're "bad." Some have assumed that they were implying that they really believe they've stopped potential attacks, but it might just also be that they really do believe that they intend to do "good" things, even if their actions are highly questionable.
Unfortunately, of course, the other famous saying is that the "road to hell is paved with good intentions." Good intentions only take you so far. When you have such a massive, highly questionable program with a very high number of abuses, it no longer matters that their intentions are good, because their actions are simply bad.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: actions, bubbles, intentions, keith alexander, leadership, nsa, nsa surveillance
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
http://railean.net/index.php/2008/04/14/how_shit_happens_1
although that's not the original source for the story. Cf. the game of "Telephone".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
iWe judge ourselves by our intentions, but we judge others by their actions
In fact even the ones on the polar opposite of this story tend to do the same. I see that on copyright discussions all the time and I try to be careful not to fall into this trap. It's easy to talk about abolishing copyright but there may be benefits and more important there is the need for protection. Lets not forget that Edison took the ideas of other inventors at the time, patented and made a whole world of money on them. This is the type of thing patents, copyright should be avoiding in the first place so instead of being extreme why not debate how these tools can be effective instead of being used by individuals and corporations to screw the legitimate creators?
What I said may seem off-topic but there is the need of some level of intelligence. Narrowly focused, in accordance to constitutional rights and with respect for the privacy of the ones not involved. How do we achieve that?
There's no doubt that the surveillance has gone too far. But we need a sane, reasonable debate. Raging and swearing at each other will just lead to yet another "Republicans vs Democrats" stupidity. Don't be fooled or put that "you hypocrite face", I fall for this trap regularly, I'm as human as Keith or the really conservative Republican (aha, stereotype detected!) and I will make mistakes. We all are, we all will. But accepting your weakness is the first step to recognize your err, accept it and overcome the weakness. Easier said than done though...
Another emphasis is needed here:
road to hell is paved with good intentions
Considering some in this privacy debate firmly believe in the intentions and are not corrupted by interests: how do we reason with them without putting them in a defensive stance thus closing their minds to any reason? Being hostile is not the answer when the other party is open to listen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
)
That belongs up there somewhere.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Intentions are meaningless
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Loaded Guns
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Loaded Guns
The 2nd Amendment is the only one that can at all guarantee the rest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Loaded Guns
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Loaded Guns
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Loaded Guns
You (political entity) sure have a bad habit of leaving (legos on the floor in the dark) and the NSA is a (very pinty pile of legos indeed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
People out of power are gullible saps.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I have an alternate theory ...
they are just plain evil
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I think demonizing people in such a manner is a really, really bad idea. It makes it much harder to fix problems.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
What that phrase again? "Never confuse malice with what could be simple ignorance", or something along those lines?
That being said, it's becoming extremely hard for me not to demonize the NSA at this point, especially with each new damning leak about their actions. And it's a pretty safe bet that the worst has yet to come.
As the Zen Master says, "We'll see."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
oh wait that translates as ... evil, nevermind.
e·vil
1. profoundly immoral and malevolent.
im·mor·al
1.not conforming to accepted standards of morality.
mo·ral·i·ty
1. principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior.
ma·lev·o·lent
1.having or showing a wish to do evil to others
synonyms - baleful, vicious, vindictive, vengeful
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Read the Wired: How to Fix the Army: Sack All the Generals and change generals for president, directors, managers, congress people and so forth and you get the picture.
That culture is not going away on its own, that is why we have institutions to keep things going after people leave, to serve as a compass to guide the others that come into it, when that compass is broken, you don't fix it, you get a new one, unfortunately there will be no changes at that level anywhere soon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Perhaps a little demonization and anger is what is necessary. We have a secret court that is reminiscent of the star chamber, where misdeeds and illegalities are hidden from public view, one that uses the threat of incarceration to maintain its secrecy. Our politicians are sworn to uphold the constitution and the law of the land, yet they do neither. Their refusal to do their jobs and hold people accountable for criminal actions they witness is appalling. And in a political system that has no consequences for misdeeds, and most often the exact opposite, they will continue to run roughshod over the constitution and the laws of this nation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Chamber
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Alexander must be a charisma king
Yes, he talks in a calm soothing way. And yes, he has facial expression that's reminiscent of Droopy from the Woody Woodpecker show.
But, come on people. Let's get past his disarming demeanor and look at what he does.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Alexander must be a charisma king
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NSA/other government agencies think that the ends justify the means.
which unfortunately isn't the best way of going about things
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In a bubble
This article pretty much sums up what I've been saying about the NSA recently: they're intentions might be good, but their actions are disturbingly efficient at paving the road to hell.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"The problem is exacerbated by people’s reluctance to tell their bosses bad news."
"The Rogers Commission found NASA's organizational culture and decision-making processes had been key contributing factors to the accident. NASA managers had known contractor Morton Thiokol's design of the SRBs contained a potentially catastrophic flaw in the O-rings since 1977, but failed to address it properly. They also disregarded warnings from engineers about the dangers of launching posed by the low temperatures of that morning and had failed in adequately reporting these technical concerns to their superiors."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Challenger_disaster
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Basically, life is a Choose Your Own Adventure and the NSA is being evil without realizing it. It's about time someone told them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No one is going to get checked unless the angry lesbian shows up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lying VS spying
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The NSA Is Just People
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The NSA Is Just People
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nope, when you look at the facts:
- Spying on the UN: illegal
- Spying on friendly governments and all their citizens: immoral at least
- Spying on Kim Dot Com: against their mandate at least
- Feeding information to DEA and IRS to use against US citizens: illegal
- Spying on love interests: illegal
- Stopped one 'terrorist action' (actually someone donating to a Mosque that passed money to a terrorist organization): The only actual legitimate use we've learned of so far, and pretty minor in the whole scheme of things.
The record clearly shows more criminal and immoral actions than anything resembling actual legitimate use within the organizations legal mandate.
Add to that the fact that elected officials are all caught up in the lies; from the Senate and House security committees lying to the public and holding back legitimate details from other members of congress, to the president himself out right lying to the people, the NSA is nothing more than a cancer eating away at democracy and freedom ... a terrorist bomb is not what's killing democracy and freedom, we are all being fooled into believing that the 1 in hundreds of million chance of being harmed by a terrorist is the real threat while being lied to about the metastasizing mass of privacy killing NSA cancer that is really eating away at our very way of life.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]