Botched TSA Pat Down Leaves Traveler Covered In Urine
from the these-are-experts dept
It certainly appears that the TSA might need a bit more training with these new intrusive groping pat downs. MSNBC has the story of a survivor of bladder cancer, who now has to wear a urostomy bag, which collects his urine for him alongside his body, trying to travel via the airport in Detroit. He tried to explain all of this to the TSA folks, and asked for a private room (as has always been promised) for a pat down, after the TSA decided that something was amiss after he went through the scanner. However, at first the TSA claimed there was no private room, then refused to listen to him explain his medical condition and did not heed warnings about how they were going to break the bag. And, yes, you guessed it, the TSA broke the bag, covering the guy and his clothes in urine, which he was unable to clean up until after boarding his plane. TSA boss John Pistole has since called the guy to apologize, but it's getting more and more difficult to take Pistole at his word when he spews his "trust me, I know what I'm doing" speech:"After coming to TSA with 26 years of intelligence and law enforcement experience at the FBI, I understand the serious threats our nation faces and the security measures we must implement to thwart potential attacks"That's getting tougher and tougher to believe.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
New TSA taglines...
"Can't see London, Can't see France, Unless we see your underpants"
"Grope discounts available"
"Better ball handlers than Kobe Bryant"
*Only the last one is my own....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: New TSA taglines...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: New TSA taglines...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: New TSA taglines...
Your wish is my command: Reason's Bumper Stickers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: New TSA taglines...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: New TSA taglines...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: New TSA taglines...
Might have been a temporary hiccup.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: New TSA taglines...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And as if that wasn't enough ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: And as if that wasn't enough ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: And as if that wasn't enough ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: And as if that wasn't enough ...
False according to Snopes
Utter Crap. The Snope article is about a false report by a gutter press newspaper of a scanner operator caught masturbating over scanner images . . . nothing to do with urine bags!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: And as if that wasn't enough ...
Learn to read in threaded mode people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: And as if that wasn't enough ...
That is a parody article like what you would read in The Onion. No need to spread false stories about the TSA. They're doing fine on their own with the truth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: And as if that wasn't enough ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fool me once
Before the Iraq war I thought,"I am going to have faith that this guy (Bush) has more intelligence information than the rest of the world". Now this guy. Fool me once...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fool me once
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sad but necessary
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oi
Seriously people a simple question could save from so much embarrassment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oi
A) Wave him through relatively secure that your gut instinct is correct: he's a bald, middle-aged white guy with a medical appliance attached to his body that will fail if you fool with it, and wave him on through.
B) Detain him, check out his story, what you can of background, and then wave him on through because you can never stay one step ahead of the "terrorists".
C) Grope him mercilessly until his urine bag breaks, then analyze the resulting liquid for explosives because you're a mindless Gov. droid and the procedures don't cover "urine bags".
Well, we all know which choice the Gov. opted for.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Oi
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The problem may be his experience
I understand that for safety sake we need to pay some prices, but someone needs to look at the problem, to find a way that deals with people, not with threats...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The problem is it's now full of urine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Sounds like others are scraping the bottom of a barrel to find reasons as to why these searches are defendable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I have 5 lbs of metal in my spine, stabilizing where several vertebrae broke, where disks had been removed.
I dread going through the new screening process because ANY PRESSURE put on that area causes immediate, unimaginable excrutiating pain. And in spite of the medical passport from y=my doctor, there is NO leeway for people with medical problems with this new screening.
The minute one of those goons presses on my back, I will be prepared to sue because I have documentation of the injury, the treatment and why it's not a good idea to have pressure placed on that area.
And I hope the poor guy in the article sues. There's absolutely NO reason for the TSA to "forcefully" pat down a medical device or an injury.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just goes to show..
Next thing you know they will do something even more stupid to someone with a medical appliance and the person will die. I could picture them removing an oxygen tank from someone who needs it and the person expiring.
I'm just avoiding air travel right now; it is way too much a hassle to deal with being groped by strangers.
If more people would simply choose not to fly if they don't have to the airlines would really complain to the government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Just goes to show..
That is absolutely true. Here is a link to the report that explains this: http://www.aclu.org/blog/technology-and-liberty/tsa-has-no-time-train-its-screeners
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TSA fever
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: TSA fever
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: TSA fever
Also, it's technically the definition of "dirt" being dished on "tech," so it fits.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Original Story...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Original Story...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trust me, I know what I'm doing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Even though the interesting thing is that planes are a poor target now. There's no way to take them over unless the terrorist to hostage ratio is at least 2:1. Anything less leaves you with a bunch of people already believing they will definitely die no matter what they are told and that's a good recipe for pissed of mob with little left to lose.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Maybe you're just trolling, but sorry, wrong.
There are only two things that have increased the safety of people in planes (and whatever they might be used to fly into) since 9/11.
1) Reinforced, locked doors to the pilot's cabin
2) As the first in the thread mentioned, passengers knowing if their plane gets taken over, they're gonna die and fighting back.
As soon as there's someone trying to break down the door to the pilot's cabin, the pilots will be on their comms letting ground control know what going on. Minutes later, there'll be a fighter jet alongside the plane ready to shoot it down if necessary.
No one on the ground will be any safer because a TSA agent breaks some guy's urine bag.
Give me a choice and I'll take the "unsecure" flight where I don't have to deal with minimum wage rent-a-cops on power trips (apologies to the genuine hard-working security officers who are actually doing their jobs correctly by treating passengers with dignity).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
There is no such thing. People work for TSA because they no other options, not because they really care. Besides, if you had that job because you care and you genuinely want that job, how long would it be before you got fed up with a never ending stream of people pissed at you for doing that job?
No apology necessary. We need policy changes not apologies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Why must those groups be mutually exclusive?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
anyway, the privatize everything ppl would probably prefer the government-does-nothing-useful tsa be replaced by a privatized tsa as successfully demonstrated by 103/lockerbie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
At least then the public would have chosen, rather than having the choice made for us. (Oar? Aren't we talking about planes, not rowboats?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
suicide bombing a teaparty protest would earn more virgin goats in paradise, especially since bunches of baggers would pull out their weapons to 'defend' themselves against an (actually vaporized) enemy.
however, unlike parah stalin, i will not tweet a map of "ripe targets".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I don't read reddit, however, if its true, what does it matter? And you do know this story is true, don't you? I'm not even going to bother to post a link. Mr. Urine bag has been in interviewed by many major news outlets. You won't have to go far to find a link to the video with his interview in it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why??
If terrorists want access to US soil they could just walk into this country anywhere along the border with Mexico - hundreds, if not thousands of people do it every single day. My intuition tells me the next terrorist attack won't involve a person on a plane at all, but we'll keep spending our resources defending the dreaded boogeyman of the sky.
I suppose if a terrorist uses a tanker truck next we'll see ground transportation get new security measures that will raise the cost of anything moved in a truck. Knee jerk reactions and ridiculous spending in the name of "National Security" shows that the terrorists have already won - to a degree.
However, what really concerns me is the scope of the focus and attention spent on airlines which leads me to think that terrorists will concentrate on a new method of attack that simply avoids all of these air-related security measures. I can only hope that I'm wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why??
In NJ, the Turnpike runs right next to a major power generating station, several petroleum processing/storage facilities, etc. All it takes is one small terrorist cell with cars and hand-held rocket launchers to knock out vital infrastructure. If they take out the power generating station most of Nj and probably half of NYC will go dark.
And it could/most likely would lead to a repeat of the failure cascade of a few years ago that left NYC and a good part of the Northeast dark for nearly a week.
The train tracks run next to the Turnpike as well, and many of the tanker cars transport the oil and other chemicals to/from the refineries. There is no security in place to protect these facilities.
They are a bigger, more immediate threat to anyone in the NY/NJ region than any individual or group flying out of JFK, LGA or Newark.
There are so many more immediate threats to our citizens than air travel. Why the heck doesn't anyone else see this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why??
2012...the year of 50,000 applicants for each minimum wage trucker job (with free TSA-supplied handjob at every break point)...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Way too fixated on our nether regions
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This might be a bit of a stretch,but...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This might be a bit of a stretch,but...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
By the People, for the People.
It's hard to blame or get mad at someone trying to help you regardless of how they fumble. The TSA's heavy handed, uncaring approach is simply wrong and I blame Pistole. When they discover that they serve the public and approach security with a humble service oriented demeanor it's going to be hard to resent or blame them regardless of their fumbles.
Instead of a team effort it's become a 'us against them' attitude both for the traveler and for TSA employees. We're all Americans, all Citizens, all responsible. Until the TSA recognizes their position and responsibility - I hope they bear the brunt of America's anxiety over their attitude and I hope that American's continue to elegantly and persistently make their resentment known.
We can do better than Mr. Pistole, read my mind Sir.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: By the People, for the People.
Well the Tea Partiers have already made it clear that public health should be a 'privilege' so why not
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just say no
Just say NO to FLYING PERIOD!
Call up SW, AA, Delta/NW, JetBlue... and tell them
I am CANCELLING my reservation because of these security procedures.
I've made my choice.. I will fly no more. I love to fly, would love to have been a pilot.. NO MORE..I got what will be my last flight in before this nonsense started.
When the airlines are ready to go under, which other than SW won't take long. These people will beat a path to DC to get this stuff curtailed back to sanity.
Until you get the airlines to feel the pain of NO $$$ then your not going to get any where.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cargo Cult again
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Adam Savage and the TSA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.aclu.org/blog/technology-and-liberty/tsa-has-no-time-train-its-screeners
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
(S)He was asking for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This Pistole guy needs to go
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Covered in urine
Absolutely disgraceful.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now the TSA has established a protocol that disabled travelers will be selected to receive the pat down method instead of being able to opt for the scanner.
If you use a wheelchair, cane, other assistive device, a service or seeing eye dog? Welcome to gropeland.
Oh ACLU, are you out there? That's just plain discrimination.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZfbTlYpKYo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Turn up for the flight in an ultra-skin tight spandex suit that leaves NOTHING to the imagination!
step 2
Travel with an embarassingly enormous salami down their skintight pants....
Approach the pat-down area, giggle like a schoolgirl and say "careful son, my little guy has a bit of a hair trigger if you know what I mean!"
or after the pat-down ask to speak to a supervisor...then ask to speak to HIS supervisor...when the higher level guy arrives ask him if the pat-downs come with a happy ending...say you're willing to pay!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
forgot to say
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Reminds me of a Bush line ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wondering.. website?
so far I've seen NOTHING.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Wondering.. website?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]