Redskins Owner Sues Local Paper Over Satirical Listing Of Grievances... Making Sure More People Read It
from the hello-ms.-streisand dept
We've talked about the ridiculous management of the Washington Redskins a few times before. This is the football team that took the extraordinary step of suing a bunch of fans who, due to the economic crisis, were unable to pay for season tickets they had ordered. While most other teams simply take back the tickets and find other buyers, the Redskins sued over 100 such fans (probably ex-fans now). The team has also been extremely aggressive in terms of what it requires of reporters, including trying to claim that posting photos of disgruntled fans was prohibited and creating "media guidelines" that seriously stifle what reporters can talk about, if they want to continue to be given any access to the team.The latest situation is even more extreme. The team's owner, Dan Snyder, appears to be the subject of much displeasure among Redskins fans. There are lots of fans of lots of sports teams who dislike the ownership. However, I don't think I've ever heard the level of dislike towards an owner like the publicly expressed feelings many fans have towards Dan Snyder. The local Washington City Paper has, of course, played up on this general dislike of Snyder, and back in November published an amusing Cranky Redskins Fan's Guide to Dan Snyder, which includes an A to Z listing of "offenses." You see this kind of column all the time about various sports owners. And most ignore it.
But not Dan Snyder.
He had his lawyers send a threat letter not to Washington City Paper, but to Atalaya Capital Management, the investment firm that owns Creative Loafing, which is the company that publishes Washington City Paper. Got that? Atalaya pointed out that they have nothing to do with the management of the paper -- and especially have nothing to do with the content of the paper, but even so, sent back a wonderful letter explaining the basics of the First Amendment to Snyder, especially with regards to public figures. The full letter is embedded below (and worth the read), but a few choice snippets:
The purpose of this letter is not to correct each of your misstatements and mischaracterizations but rather to assert the media's First Amendment right to comment on public figures (which your client undeniably is) and matters of public interest (into which your client voluntarily injected himself through his prominent ownership of the Washington Redskins).The letter also highlights that Atalaya had been informed by the paper that it was more than happy to allow Mr. Snyder the ability to respond in the pages of its publication.
The Column plainly is a tongue-in-cheek opinion piece expressing fans' frustration with your client's ownership of the Redskins. This is quintessential First Amendment-protected speech. Indeed, the U.S. Supreme Court has made clear that "one of the prerogatives of American citizenship is the right to criticize public men and measures. Such criticism, inevitably, will not always be reasoned or moderate; public figures as well as public officials will be subject to vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks."
Snyder, apparently, decided not to pay much heed to this letter, as he proceeded with the lawsuit (full suit embedded below), in which he makes a number of claims. Now, there certainly were some statements that were made in the original article that, if untrue, could be defamatory. However, some of the claims were just downright crazy. The most ridiculous, of course, is his decision to claim that the illustration that accompanied the original article (shown below) was somehow anti-semitic.
Of course, the even bigger issue is that in bringing this lawsuit, you can bet that a hell of a lot more people have now seen the original article totally trashing Dan Snyder. If his goal was to suppress this content, then he's failed badly (yet again). On top of that, a lot more folks now think that Snyder has an incredibly thin skin. I would also imagine that Snyder will not enjoy any actual legal fight, in which the various assertions about him in that original column are dragged into court and examined for accuracy. Even if there are libelous statements in there, is Snyder really interested in going through a courtroom analysis of each of the claims in the column?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: attention, dan snyder, defamation, redskins
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Oh lordy
And they say Americans don't do dry humor well.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sigh...
Ah, I see. Dan Snyder objects to the to squigly lines drawing devil horns and a goatee (by cracky) on his image because they're anti-Semetic. Dan Snyder, you see, is against images and depictions of racist and culturally insensitive nature.
Hey, fuckhead. You own an NFL football team based in the nation's capital called the REDSKINS! Are you kidding me? It's an insensitive term with a stereotypical logo of an American Indian, the gall of which is only supplanted by the fact that the team is located in the home city of the governing body that raped and pillaged their people? Who the hell are you crappin'?
How about some Irish immigrant owning a football team called the New York Porchmonkeys (I'm just bringing it back)? Or that Saratoga Slants? Maybe the Talahassee Towelheads? Portland Pollocks? Ooooh, the Memphis Micks (that one is close to my heart)?
Way to be a hypocritical polesmoker there, D-bag....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Sigh...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Sigh...
Damn. That's such a good point, I'm really disappointed in myself for not thinking of it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This has been all over the DC area
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Sigh...
We could have the Dallas Drunken White Trash, the Detroit Niggers, New Jersey Wops, Boston Micks and the New York Jets.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Taking a cue from Dark Helmet & Mike...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Taking a cue from Dark Helmet & Mike...
I was going to suggest the Washington Foreskins, but then we'd be right back to the anti-Semite thing....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: This has been all over the DC area
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I live in DC
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Sigh...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Sigh...
Heh, the point probably would have been more effective if I wasn't sporting an avatar w/a stylized Blackhawks jersey....
That said, I'm not the one speaking out hypocritically about offensive mascot images, so I'm considering myself in the clear....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Sigh...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Sigh...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
I'm copying it & forwarding it to everyone I know :D
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Sigh...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Sigh...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Sigh...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Werewolves are Hebrew?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Al Davis Proves the Point
I think the hatred of Al Davis by Raiders fans (of which I am not) is worse, but he isn't suing them (just the league and former coaching staff). Kinda gives credence to the Streisand Effect point you made.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Sigh...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nation's Capital?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
tongue-in-cheek praise
Until reports of his suit, this was below the radar even in most of D.C. area. Talk about a Streisand Effect, wow !!
http://goo.gl/w6BkT
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Nation's Capital?
Well, if they are then somebody in the NFL is geographically challenged, considering they're in the AFC East division....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Sigh...
(PS.. My avatar is a easter-colored snowflake)
:)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Al Davis Proves the Point
When the Chicago Blackhawks announced that owner Bill Wirtz was dead, the crowd cheered. Ask Dark Helmet. I think that's a higher level of dislike than Dan Snyder has received so far.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Dan Snyder is the biggest douche bag in the universe
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Al Davis Proves the Point
It's true. More dislike for the man. Problem is there's a ton of Redskins fans and when Dollar Bill Wirtz died there were about 75 people in the city that could tell you two players on their top line....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I love this.
Also Dark Helmet, Redskins are NFC East, not AFC.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
My God! He's an even more gigantic douche than I ever thought possible.
One creature, the source of such epic douche baggery that residents of neighboring galaxies must be laughing in contempt and derision at the entire Milky Way. The shame! This can never be explained or rationalized, but simply borne by the rest of us for eternity. It makes me ashamed to be a carbon based life form, knowing that we collectively allowed this to happen, and did nothing to prevent or stop it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I love this.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Nation's Capital?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Al Davis Proves the Point
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Nation's Capital?
Er...you mean NFC East I think...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Sigh...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
This could be a late play for a second win of the Tank McNamara Sports Jerk of the year contest for Snyder.
http://www.gocomics.com/tankmcnamara/2011/02/05/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
twitter meme
[ link to this | view in thread ]
bullying journalism
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Pixelation
[ link to this | view in thread ]