Amazon Uses Steve Jobs Words Against Him In App Store Dispute
from the app-store-me dept
You may recall that Apple has been trying to convince the world that there can be only one "app store," first by suggesting it really means Apple Store and then by suing Amazon for its own app store. Amazon has now responded to the lawsuit by using Steve Jobs own words against him:In 2008 Apple launched its app store, which allows a consumer to view and instantly download apps for their Apple devices such as the iPhone, iPad, and iPod. In press releases, Apple has claimed that its app store is "the largest application store in the world." In October 2010, Apple’s CEO Steve Jobs called Apple's app store "the easiest-to-use, largest app store in the world, preloaded on every iPhone."That certainly sounds like Apple and Jobs admitting that the term is generic. To further support its own position, Amazon notes to some linguists as well:
The American Dialect Society, a leading group of U.S. linguists, recently voted "app" as the "Word of the Year" for 2010, noting that although the word "has been around for ages," it "really exploded in the last 12 months" with the "arrival of 'app stores' for a wide spectrum of operating systems for phones and computers." Indeed, the words "app store" are commonly used among many businesses competing in the app store market.It certainly looks like Apple may have a difficult job convincing anyone that app store is not generic.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: app store, steve jobs, trademark
Companies: amazon, apple
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Cool
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cool
Honestly, sometimes watching these goofballs is like watching my two dogs fight over the fake rubber bone toy that doesn't taste like anything. I always wonder why they fight over it.
It's a rubber bone, you idiots!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cool
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Cool
She's like a pornstar that way....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Cool
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Cool
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Cool
Either they fight over which one belongs to each person/dog or fight over the same one because for some odd reason that's the one everyone wants.
I never had siblings, so maybe that's my gap in understanding.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Cool
Yes, having siblings gives you a different perspective on most of those "fights". It's really a dominance thing, even if they are not conscious of that being the reason.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cool
He was probably rubbed the wrong way about it at some point and (like the dogs you described) is simply incapable of letting something go.
To steal part of a great quote, before he would let an argument go, he would "stand at the pearly gates and kick St. Peter right in the teeth"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cool
Yeah, it doesn't have the same ring to it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cool
It's never about the bone, rather who is the top dog. (read ego in this case).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cool
There's nothing accidental or inevitable about the Amazon's use of this name. They could have called it the App Mart, Amazon Store, Amazon Apps, whatever. But they deliberately choose to use a name identical to Apple's to ride Apple's coat tail.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Cool
Even Jobs used it in a generic way by saying, "...the easiest-to-use, largest app store in the world." He's admitting there are other app stores in the world, hence generic. It's no different than the tag "grocery store." Just like the grocery store is a place to buy groceries, an app store is a place to buy apps.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Cool
"If the tag "App Store" was exclusive to Apple, then if someone told me they bought an app via "the" app store, I would ask them which one? Apple, Android, Amazon? "
You would only ask "which one" when the term App Store does not exclusively designate Apple's application store. Since Android's store was called Android Market, and Amazon's store didn't exist before Apple's, you wouldn't have had this confusion, until Amazon's store that is.
So it's very clear Amazon's use of App Store has created confusion in the market.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Cool
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Cool
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Cool
You're misunderstanding the entire concept of trademarks. It's so people don't get confused. No one is gonna go to Amazon Appstore to buy stuff for an iPod because its actually impossible.
You've been fooled by Apple and other lawsuit happy companies into thinking trademarks are for protecting the name, not the customer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Cool
"...the easiest-to-use, largest app store in the world."
Hasn't he, himself made it a generic term? The answer to that is simply a "Yes Mr. Gordon sir, he has."
My 2 cents.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Cool
So when Steve Jobs said "...the easiest-to-use, largest app store in the world" he was confused by Amazon's creation of its app store in the future? Because clearly, Steve thought there were other "app stores" competing with Apple, since he emphasized how theirs is easiest/largest. You don't get to say "largest" if there is nothing else out there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Cool
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Cool
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_digital_distribution_platforms_for_mobile_devices
No ne of the stores that openned before Apple's App Store named itself the "App Store" or used "App Store" as part of its name.
Apple's law suit with Amazon is the use of "App Store" as the name of its application store, not the application store itself.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Cool
You're failing to realize that Apple isn't actually perfect and sometimes are a bunch of bullies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Cool
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cool
A long and costly battle for both of them essentially means higher prices for consumers....how is that a good thing?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cool
I don't see the price of Android phones going up because of Apple's legal actions with Amazon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cool
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Poor Apple
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Poor Apple
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Poor Apple
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Poor Apple
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Poor Apple
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Poor Apple
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
poor Amazon
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Find ways to bring your product to market cheaper with less restrictions.
It's costly and prohibitive - what more would a consumer want? (sarcasm).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Next up...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The nerd axiom proven true again
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Apple doesn't need to win to come out ahead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Apple doesn't need to win to come out ahead.
The fight is with Amazon, As a droid user, It affects me, lets see, not at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Apple doesn't need to win to come out ahead.
http://twitter.com/#!/amazonappstore
Other than that it's not much different then the Google Market.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Apple doesn't need to win to come out ahead.
This effects absolutely no one. Google Market still works the same.
Amazon Appstore works just fine and is still called appstore until a court tells them otherwise. In fact I downloaded the free app of the day just a few hours ago. Even if they do have to change what it's called they'll just update their app and everything will continue working as before.
This hurts effectively hurts no consumers, and does nothing for apple except to make them look petty and wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trademarking "app store"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Trademarking "app store"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Trademarking "app store"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
be consistant
But let's say that terms that were very generic are not allowed to be used as a trademark. I would be all for that. But the issue is that companies get Trademarks on already used terms... such as windows. Windows was used widely in the 'real' computing industry before Microsoft belatedly tossed their hat into the ring.
And they got what? Windows as a Trademark. Why? Because someone was really dumb and asleep at the Trademark office, and perhaps because a far-behind the curve company needed a way to make itself stand out... what better way than using a already popular term?
Then... we have SQL as an existing name. And Server as an existing name. Why not, when you find yourself behind the curve, yet again, use two (2) common and widely used names (please note that these names were also widely used together as well), to try to capitalize on generic terms?
If you can not argue with structured thoughts, please, at least argue with consistency.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: be consistant
Everyone who points that out is trying to justify this, but it simply isn't the same. You need to reason this through before bringing it up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Steve: "What I said was it means Apple Store"
Amazon: "Nuh uh, you said application store!"
S: "No I didn't!"
But seriously, why would app be short for apple?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Filthy cash
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Apple and thier cows
[ link to this | view in chronology ]