Hulu Sued For Violating 'TV Guide' Patent

from the because-without-that,-no-one-would-have-thought-of-it dept

Earlier this year, we noted that Rovi (the hip new name for DRM company Macrovision) had taken a bunch of the patents it got when it bought Gemstar/TV Guide a few years back, and sued Amazon for daring to offer a TV listing on IMDB. Apparently Rovi is having so much fun suing people for doing totally obvious things that it's expanded the effort and is now suing Hulu as well. It's interesting to see that it's actually using different patents in this case, compared to in the Amazon case, but that doesn't make them any less questionable:
  • 6,396,546: "Electronic television program guide schedule system and method"
  • 7,103,906: "User controlled multi-device media-on-demand system"
  • 7,769,775: "Search engine for video and graphics with access authorization"
Yet another case where actually doing the obvious thing to provide the obvious service you want to offer... gets you sued. America's innovation system at work.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: patents, tv guide
Companies: gemstar, hulu, macrovision, rovi


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Stephen, 2 Aug 2011 @ 12:37pm

    Hmm.. Maybe...

    Maybe I can patent a system in which it is used so that one party may be able to sue another party, and then I can send letters to both those parties for suing each other in violation of my patent...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mitch Featherston, 2 Aug 2011 @ 12:45pm

    Unbelievable

    I guess it's easier for companies to sue or threaten legal action than to actually innovate. At some point, this has to end. How long does a technology/software patent last?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      E. Zachary Knight (profile), 2 Aug 2011 @ 1:05pm

      Re: Unbelievable

      Unfortunately 20 years. Far longer than the technologies they cover last. However, that has never stopped a patent holder from suing people using 19 year old patents.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      MikeC (profile), 2 Aug 2011 @ 1:24pm

      Re: Unbelievable

      for all intents and purposes patents these days seem to last indefinitely, every time a ton are about to expire a way is found to keep them patented

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Richard (profile), 2 Aug 2011 @ 1:57pm

        Re: Re: Unbelievable

        for all intents and purposes patents these days seem to last indefinitely, every time a ton are about to expire a way is found to keep them patented

        Usually by just filing another patent that says the same thing in different words.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mitch Featherston, 2 Aug 2011 @ 12:45pm

    Unbelievable

    I guess it's easier for companies to sue or threaten legal action than to actually innovate. At some point, this has to end. How long does a technology/software patent last?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Ninja (profile), 2 Aug 2011 @ 12:51pm

    I should sue you for the patent 6,666,666: "Blog for unbelievable moronic things you see in the world". That's actually not a patent but probably some sort of copyright (or trademark for the heck of it) but I'll sue anyway.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 2 Aug 2011 @ 1:05pm

    Sorry Mike

    I've applied for a patent for 'bitching on the internet.'

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Aug 2011 @ 1:14pm

    hulu sucks

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    SUNWARD (profile), 2 Aug 2011 @ 1:17pm

    last one

    was granted in August 2010. (applied for in 2007)

    Like no one was doing searches in 2007?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Chris, 13 Sep 2011 @ 8:40pm

      Re: last one

      No kidding...I was using my computer as a DVR as far back as 2003/2004 and two guesses where my guide data came from and the first doesn't count.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Lirodon, 2 Aug 2011 @ 1:19pm

    Prior art:

    Every single Excel spreadsheet and every single event planning book.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Chronno S. Trigger (profile), 2 Aug 2011 @ 1:27pm

      Re:

      Screw Excel, how about TV Guide? The first one was published in 1953. Adding "on the Internet" is not a new invention.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        JEDIDIAH, 3 Aug 2011 @ 7:07am

        The problem with software...

        The problem with software patents is that they ultimately break down into algorithms that don't necessarily have any thing to do with computers. You can implement these techniques in the absence of a computing machine.

        A copy of TV Guide from 1953 is a great example of this.

        So you end up with new patents on 50 year old "technology".

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Nicedoggy, 2 Aug 2011 @ 1:55pm

    There is a lot of prior art on epguides.com

    http://epguides.com/FAQ/related.html

    Good times, I don't use that anymore but some people may find it useful.

    on-my.tv for example started in 2005.
    tVDB is probably also but not sure.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    drewmerc (profile), 2 Aug 2011 @ 1:57pm

    BBC's Radio Times was first issued on 28 September 1923
    altho i have not looked i'm sure it had tv listing's once tv started

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    trish, 2 Aug 2011 @ 2:25pm

    hmmmm....

    I remember the tv schedule off the top of my head. Does the storage of TV guide information in my brain constitute a violation of these patents?
    On a side note, how many patents do you think the human brain infringes on? "Device and system for analysis and storage of life events as sensory input information", "Device and system for the control of bodily functions through electrical impulses to the nervous system (patent pending)" ...?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Aug 2011 @ 3:14pm

    Yahoo

    I wonder if this is why Yahoo dumped their tv listings.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Aug 2011 @ 5:04pm

    it's always obvious after someone shows you how to do it.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Brendan (profile), 2 Aug 2011 @ 11:15pm

      Re:

      It's obvious if you think about the problem at hand and combine with pedestrian knowledge of web hosting and relaional databases.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        JEDIDIAH, 3 Aug 2011 @ 7:27am

        Web Hosting and Relational Databases

        The TV Guide grid from 1953 can be thought of as a single SQL query.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    gorehound (profile), 2 Aug 2011 @ 5:18pm

    I am now unemployed and need money.Maybe I should think of some ridiculous patent and then I can sue me some Companies and make a ton of money.

    Wait I won't.I am not a scumbag

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      The Devil's Coachman (profile), 3 Aug 2011 @ 8:14am

      Re:

      You can learn to be a scumbag, simply by watching companies such as Rovi, which seems to be populated entirely by scumbags. They can teach you a thing or two about how to be a sub-human parasite, as well as some tips on how to get blood out of turnips, and how to be a complete drag on society, while serving no useful purpose whatsoever. Look, watch, learn. They have a lot to show you, and you probably ain't seen nothing yet.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    ECA (profile), 2 Aug 2011 @ 6:11pm

    WTF

    So I can create a BASIC spread sheet format...
    Go out and ADD, info from the Internet channels direct to it..WITH PERMISSION
    SORT it by TIME OF SHOW, per channel...

    ANd these guys have a patent on a spread sheet.????

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.