Righthaven Files Emergency Motion To Try To Keep Its Assets
from the that's-not-going-to-work dept
Looks like Righthaven has finally reappeared... filing an "emergency motion" in the 9th Circuit appeals court trying to prevent Marc Randazza from continuing to move forward in the Hoehn case, where (as you may have heard) Righthaven has been ordered to hand over various assets (and the company's righthaven.com domain is being auctioned off). Randazza has filed a response (embedded below) in which he goes back to bringing up Herman Melville's classic story Bartleby the Scrivener, in which Bartleby never does any work because "I would prefer not to." If that sounds familiar, it may be because Randazza used that line the last time Righthaven filed for an "emergency" stay in the same 9th Circuit Appeals Court... in the same case. That time the court rejected it, and as Randazza explains, there are tons of reasons to reject it again. You can read the entire filing explaining all the reasons that Righthaven's emergency filing makes no sense -- especially since it failed to bother to oppose many of the things it's now fighting when they were happening in the district court. However, the key reason is simply procedural:While it would be far more satisfying to see this motion defeated on substantive grounds, it fails cleanly as a matter of procedure. Rule 27-3(a) requires the movant’s counsel to make "every practicable effort" to notify opposing counsel before filing an Emergency Motion. Righthaven’s counsel failed to do so, and misled this Court about his efforts to do so. Hoehn’s counsel first learned of the Motion by receiving it through the Court’s cm/ecf system .... Only after receiving the Motion did Hoehn's counsel receive a fax from Righthaven's counsel notifying them of its intent to file this MotionI used to think that Righthaven might make a useful law school case study some day, but now I'm wondering if there shouldn't be an entire class studying Righthaven in order to teach lawyers exactly what not to do in handling cases.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: hoehn, marc randazza, righthaven
Companies: righthaven
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Is it going to show up to court this time ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
They would prefer not to do so.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You could probably build a legal ethics course around Righthaven.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I would help establish an entire class...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Your all freetards and thieves
added sep 14/10.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Your all freetards and thieves
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Your all freetards and thieves
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Your all freetards and thieves
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Law school case study?
The lawyers still got paid, right? This may indeed be a case study in law school, but only as an example of the stupid shit you can get paid to do as a successful lawyer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Law school case study?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Law school case study?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...or mini-series.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Karma
Always a happy day when a Copyright Troll meets their fate set by Karma. A money making get-rich-quick scheme ending in bankruptcy seems Karma enough.
You would think a lawyer would know and follow the law better than your average Joe but arrogance always seems to fail them.
So one more on the way out and plenty more to follow.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Karma
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]