Bandcamp Embraces Pirate Googlers, Turns Them Into Customers
from the it's-not-so-hard-to-compete dept
A common complaint from the legacy movie and music industries is that when people Google things like "watch movies online," unauthorized sources rank higher than legitimate ones (for some crazy reason, it seems like people prefer comprehensive libraries of unrestricted links over stale selections of geoblocked videos). Moreover, they complain about autocomplete terms like "torrent," completely missing the fact that those are caused by people searching that exact thing, not the other way around.
So it's great to see the people at Bandcamp doing the exact opposite and celebrating the prevalence of those dirty pirate keywords. They looked at their own analytics and noticed a lot of sales being generated by search terms that would send your average RIAA lobbyist running to Congress:
For example, just this morning someone paid $10 for an album after Googling "lelia broussard torrent." A bit later, a fan plunked down $17 after searching for "murder by death, skeletons in the closet, mediafire." Then a $15 sale came in from the search "maimouna youssef the blooming hulkshare." Then a fan made a $12 purchase after clicking a link on music torrent tracker What.CD. Then someone spent $10 after following a link on The Pirate Bay, next to the plea "They sell their album as a download on their website. You can even choose your format (mp3, ogg, flac, etc). Cmon, support this awesome band!"
That last part is another example of how Mike described Louis CK's recent experiment: be polite, be awesome and be human. CK's video was also available on the Pirate Bay, and as someone here pointed out, it spurred several users to comment with links and encourage people to buy, while others offered explanations for their decision to use the torrent. Though there can be no doubt that in both cases some "hardcore" pirates just didn't give a damn, there are far more people who just want to be polite, awesome and human and support the artists who do the same.
Bandcamp recognizes that people who search for torrents and file locker links are, at the core, just fans looking to get some new music. By focusing on serving those fans, they don't need to worry about illegitimate sources -- after all, in most cases they already provide a superior option:
We see these sales as proof that Bandcamp can effectively compete with filesharing and other free distribution platforms by a) giving fans a clear, easy way to directly support the artist, and b) offering them a better user experience. Our favorite recent example of this was an $8 sale that started with the search “milosh flac -torrent.” So here was a fan looking for a Milosh record, wanted a high quality flac, but didn’t want to have to sift through a bunch of torrent sites. And that led them right to Bandcamp, and right to putting money in the artist’s pocket. Beautiful.
Beautiful indeed. When you tear down walls instead of constantly building new ones you can actually turn search terms like "torrent" to your advantage, rather than resorting to SEO-by-lawsuit. Bandcamp is yet more proof that you can "compete with free," if you give people an attractive alternative.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: competing with free, infringement, piracy, search
Companies: bandcamp
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Queue the screaming, and hair-pulling when the *AA's see how much they've lost when more and more artists realize the baked-in goodness of opportunities like Bandcamp.
Beautiful indeed!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
While I do think it's hard to find anything to discredit this I don't dare to underestimate the trolls after I read one saying that libraries rip off the creators.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I like the setup from a business point, but there doesn't seem to be an easy way to search artists.
I wonder how long before the major labels find a way to shut it down or buy into it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Queue the screaming, and hair-pulling when the *AA's see how much they've lost when more and more artists realize the baked-in goodness of opportunities like Bandcamp.
Beautiful indeed!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Ooh! Ooh! I choose AOL and CompuServe! :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Hehe. The Engineering Department at the company where I worked in the 90's used to decorate a Christmas tree with nothing but free AOL CD's every year.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
See there's your problem right there. If fans can directly support the artist, it takes money away from hardworking gatekeepers like media conglomerates. Directly supporting an artist is the same as stealing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You know, that would be funnier, if it weren't so insanely accurate. The big record companies don't care a whit for the artist themselves, only for how much money they can make for them. Hence, something like bandcamp, where the money goes straight to the artist and bypasses the big gatekeepers entirely, is 'taking money away from them', and therefore 'stealing'.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
there, fixed it for you. when it comes to the gatekeepers they couldn't care less if the artists starve to death in a gutter. They only pretend to care -for now- because the gutter part would be bad publicity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Out of curiosity, why exactly does that preclude Kickstarter as being a way to raise some or all of the money?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
The point I was trying to make is that it's not easy to raise that kind of money in 90 days, especially when anything but a VERY small movie is going to cost a lot more than 50k. Kickstarter is all or nothing with a RIDICULOUS time limit for some projects, which is what makes it unnecessarily hard. That's why I like gofundme.com a LOT better. No forced time limits, and the project owner gets the money immediately. Not to mention that the project can continue to raise money if additional funds are needed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
@Paul regarding what you said earlier - i don't think it's actually that crazy or wrong of him to have brought up movies instead of music - I did actually talk about the film/TV industries at the beginning of the post and use them as a counterexample to Bandcamp
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
"many people on this site are so jaded that they would never pay for content that came from a movie studio"
...and many do pay, and pay handsomely, but get branded as pirates when they point out how the industry repeatedly loses sales through its own outdated business practices.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
But don't worry. We already know that 50 Cent uploading his own video to Youtube makes you wet the bed at night.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No where in that statement do I mention piracy or lawful sales. Make it easy and good for them then sales will follow.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nice
Of course, some of us already understand this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google search (search terms not available)
in the bandcamp search statistics?
Either this or somehow company-protected search inputs (or both)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]