Translating Chris Dodd's Sanctimonious Bluster On Internet Protests Into English
from the thank-us-later,-chris dept
Following the MPAA's "statement" concerning today's internet blackout, Kevin Marks offered up a useful translation for us to post.WASHINGTON--The following is a statement by Senator Chris Dodd, Chairman and CEO of the Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. (MPAA) on the so-called “Blackout Day” protesting anti-piracy legislation:
Senator and CEO - let's lead with the revolving door promises to politicians
“Only days after the White House and chief sponsors of the legislation responded to the major concern expressed by opponents and then called for all parties to work cooperatively together,
Why are my former colleagues listening to their constituents about legislation? Don't they stay bought?
some technology business interests are resorting to stunts that punish their users or turn them into their corporate pawns, rather than coming to the table to find solutions to a problem that all now seem to agree is very real and damaging.
Maybe if we keep saying copyright infringement is a real problem without evidence, they'll believe it.
It is an irresponsible response and a disservice to people who rely on them for information and use their services.
How dare they edit their sites unless we force them to under penalty of perjury and felony convictions?
It is also an abuse of power given the freedoms these companies enjoy in the marketplace today.
Tomorrow was supposed to be different, that's why we bought this legislation.
It’s a dangerous and troubling development when the platforms that serve as gateways to information intentionally skew the facts to incite their users in order to further their corporate interests.
Being the gateways and skewing the facts is our job, dammit.
A so-called “blackout” is yet another gimmick, albeit a dangerous one, designed to punish elected and administration officials who are working diligently to protect American jobs from foreign criminals.
I am high as a kite
It is our hope that the White House and the Congress will call on those who intend to stage this “blackout” to stop the hyperbole and PR stunts and engage in meaningful efforts to combat piracy.”
What have the Romans done for us? Apart from instantaneous global communications, digital audio and video editing, the DVD, Blu-ray, Digital projection, movie playback devices in everyone's pockets and handbags...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: blackouts, chris dodd, condescension, pipa, protect ip, protests, sopa, translation
Companies: mpaa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Because 'piracy' isnt a hyperbolic term? And we can engage in a meaningful conversation when they gain a meaningful understanding of the technology in play.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Don't forget 'stealing stealers' and 'thefty thiefers' in your hyperbolic analysis!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Jet? No. Space Station? Atmosphere is gone, but still in the grips of earths gravity? Not yet. On the way to Mars? Now we are getting closer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: high as a kite
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Some industry business interests are resorting to stunts that buy politicians and turn them into their corporate pawns that insist on hastily passing a one sided bill after only allowing mostly corporate interests a voice in congress rather than coming to the table to find solutions to a (non) problem that (not) all now seem to agree is very real and damaging.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Chris Dodd, screw you and go DIAF.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
"It is an irresponsible response and a disservice to people who rely on them for information and use their services."
The assumption is that users are somehow entitled to their services and so denying them their services is a disservice. No one is entitled to their services.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
So these corporations aren't supposed to exercise their freedoms (and hence they're supposed to have no freedoms).
Only big govt established monopolist corporations can have and abuse their freedoms, influence, and money by being permitted to contribute as much as they like to political ads under free speech pretexts. The moment someone challenges the govt established monopolists these free speech arguments don't apply. The corporations are people too argument only applies when it favors us.
"designed to punish elected and administration officials who are working diligently to protect American jobs from foreign criminals. "
So exercising our free speech and protesting a bill is punishing elected officials now? We're supposed to simply allow congress to pass whatever bill it likes with no resistance no matter how much we disagree with the bill, otherwise we're somehow punishing them?
When they signed up for this job this is what they signed up for. It's their job to consider criticisms and protests against various bills so that they can better represent their constituents. What, is that too much work or something? If you don't like it, find another job. Oh, those jobs might suck too? Work sucks, I know, but the rest of us have to work too. and dealing with protests and considering them when drafting legislation is part of your job.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Oh, wait...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
For a pious Chris to claim that this has bee an open forum is disgusting. Then he goes as far to say the public consists of a bunch of mindless drones following the orders of their corporate masters.. Insulting!!! ITS STILL WE THE PEOPLE... RIGHT CHRIS!!!!! YOU SMUG LITTLE NEOPHYTE!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think this statement is more telling as it stands than the translation..
An abuse of power my ass. Any power that comes from putting messages on their websites or taking down their website comes by way of their own honest efforts being appreciated by people and is theirs by right to do with as they wish. What right have you got to tell them what to do with their sites, services and assets?
Also, I seem to recall the oscars and other awards shows spouting off your own messages on these subjects in the past, to a much lesser effect of course since you are known for being corrupt and because you are pushing legislation when you should be working. WTF.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
That's easy. He was elected by moronic sheep who voted the way the mainstream traditional media told them to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
but you can't use that sort of power by withholding your service.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Honest Politician
"What'd'ya call an honest politician? One that stays bought once you buy 'im."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Honest Politician
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Honest Politician
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Haaaa!
Typically guilty people accuse everyone else of doing what they are doing. The shock that everyone is seeing right through them is getting comical to watch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110917/01561815993/cocaine-ring-used-universal-musics -interscope-label-to-ship-drugs-cash.shtml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dangerous and troubling
> platforms that serve as gateways to information
> intentionally skew the facts to incite their users
> in order to further their corporate interests.
1. But it's okay if major news organizations, which are also platforms and gateways to information, owned by the proponents of SOPA, don't say a peep about this travesty until a public uprising makes it impossible to ignore.
2. How dare other corporate interests encourage, er I meant incite, their users to exercise their voice. What do they think this is -- a democracy of something?
3. Corporations exercising their voice to further their corporate interests -- how dare they! Next they'll be thinking that *their* corporations should have the rights of people, just as *our* corporations do.
Maybe the people will start to distrust traditional media somewhat and start looking for more on the dreaded Internet. (horrors!)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Dangerous and troubling
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Dangerous and troubling
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: ?
To the trolls: keep protesting, you've got us on the ropes!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ?
Basically, they are trying to play down the implications of the blackout. Something that's kinda hard to do when you already have a co-sponsor of the bill bailing out in face of this opposition.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: ?
1. Encouraging people to contact their elected officials is "bullying"
2. Since some objectionable sections have been removed from the bills, anyone who still doesn't support them isn't interested in "compromise"
3. Taking down your own website is "an abuse of power."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: ?
4. Taking your business away from a company that supports things you don't like is a violation of the company's right of free speech.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: ?
Ticked all the boxes on the trolling checklist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Be careful what you say, I have heard repeatedly over the years that there is a difference between malicious dishonesty and wilful ignorance.
More than that, apparently making claims of fact about things that you have no evidence for doesn't even count as either of those but is considered a valid viewpoint.
However I agree with you, people who make strong claims without having any evidence to support those claims are indeed lying.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
High as a kite
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://torrentfreak.com/senator-roy-blunt-drops-pipa-co-sponsorship-120118/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google can do what it wants with its private property. If they choose to use their private property to protest bad legislation then I'm all for it.
One problem with IP extremists is that they don't respect property rights unless it's to their benefit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Yeah, I'm gonna listen to *that* guy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
--------------
It is our hope that the White House and the Congress will call on those who intend to stage this “blackout” to stop the hyperbole and PR stunts and engage in meaningful efforts to combat piracy.”
--------------
Part of the whole trouble with making bills is closed door sessions where anyone outside the vested interests are not invited to input. It results in this 'no one wants this but us' problem. After all the vested interests didn't pay the internet, only the law makers it wanted to influence.
Maybe that's the source of the problem with engaging.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It is our home that the government will censor this protest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Calendar No. 70
112TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION S. 968
To prevent online threats to economic creativity and theft of intellectual
property, and for other purposes.
Can anyone tell me what "economic creativity" is?
How about "and for other porposes"?
I then read through the rest of the 63 pages of text. (31 of them lined out)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Vague much?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
revolving door?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You missed one:
Because, well, that's Dodd's job, to be a highly paid corporate pawn. How's he going to make bank selling himself if other people are willing to give it away for free?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Translation: "Do not mess with my new job or else, stop lobbying it for free you are stealing ma money"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Translation: "Old habits are hard to get out of cause you didn't say anything new or sensible. Again."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hyperbole?
Maybe it's time you were fired from your day job, Senator...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]