Scammers Mimic Copyright Troll Shakedowns In Targeting Megaupload Users
from the but-of-course dept
We've noted in the past the similarities between mass IP infringement trolling lawsuits and shakedown scams -- and have even seen some out-and-out scammers mimic the techniques of copyright trolls. Torrentfreak now reports that some scammers are specifically targeting Megaupload users, pretending to be lawyers demanding payment for infringements on Megaupload. While these are pure scams, given the MPAA's own statements about possibly suing Megaupload users, combined with the success rate that copyright trolls often have in getting some people to just pay up, it seems likely that a fair number of recipients of such a scam letter are actually falling for it.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, copyright troll, scams, shakedown
Companies: megaupload
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The lawyers will get a slap on the wrist and a sternly worded ruling.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
New old news
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Or fake takedown notices.
I CANT TELL THE DIFFERENCE. THEY ARE BOTH SCAMS! :D
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't give in...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Given the hosting company is a Company with a reputation for probity, honesty and ethical business practices it most likely wasn't them. This only leaves the US Govt which has proven itself unethical and dishonest. But, you know, the US Govt may be cash strapped but this penny ante scheme won't help them out of the financial shit.
So someone else has access to the data...hmmm the RIAA and the other usual suspects have access to it? Would they raise themselves up from the the dregs aspiring to enter the gutter and extort money from people like this? Naaa! Not enough involved in it for them to participate.
So who, then. Common criminals? Having access to data locked up by the US Govt? The porous US Govt?
Sounds about right.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I get about 15 messages a week across my accounts telling me I have lost messages on Facebook, my Battlenet account is suspended, The UN wants to give me 21 million for getting scammed, LinkedIn has messages for me, the FBI is investigating me, etc etc etc. They are all scams and I don't even blink because I never used those services.
I have used Mega in the past to host a file for a community, insert shill attack here, because it was easy and accessible. So a message about Mega to me would at least get opened before I laughed my ass off at the contents.
The trick is not so much being specific in your targeting, but using the right keywords that won't trip a spam filter, and ring remotely true to a recipient.
If "Nigerian Prince Scams" weren't working do you think we'd still be getting emails about helping them steal money?
You can spam thousands of people for pennies, if one bites your already in the black.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
All scams work on one of two human emotions. Fear or greed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
They don't, presumably.
It's not clear, but the images on the article are referred to as "screenshots", which presumably means that these are being sent as emails rather than physical letters. In other words, it works like a typical phishing scam - huge numbers of emails are sent to random addresses. Anyone who wasn't a Megaupload user or has a decent spam filter will just ignore the emails, as would anyone who understands how these scams work. A handful of those contacted would take it seriously, admit guilt (or get scared by threats of future legal action) and pay up.
No corruption or conspiracy involved, just a phishing scam that latches on to a new fear vector to extort money like any other scam. The only thing that makes this notable in comparison to other scams is that it's exactly what the RIAA have threatened to do, only using a better targeted database. The scam itself is identical.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kill them all: God will know his own
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"Sorry Judge, I was not ignoring the Court, my email filter ate your Notice"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I dare you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Last I heard, said documents had to be sent registered mail (signature required) otherwise there were no grounds for claiming the person was not responding.
Possibly, these litigation threat letters are not considered legal documents. In that case there is no recourse for the sender other than proceeding with a court case when no response is received.
amirite? ... btw, ianal
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hey wait a minute...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Scammers getting scammed. It's called karma.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sorry, but... SUCKERS!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In regards to the two AC's just above me who seem to think that anyone who actually paid must be guilty:
Or perhaps they don't feel like potentially getting dragged through the court system, and paying thousands in lawyers fees, just to prove their innocence.
Or do laughably clueless people like you honestly think that nobody innocent could ever be the target of a lawsuit/shakedown, and therefor anyone who paid to avoid the much more expensive court battle to prove their innocence was guilty?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mega-upload takedown
Let's outlaw: Claw hammers, chain saws, screwdrivers, wrenches larger than 5/8 inch, rocks, sticks, axes, pickaxes, shovels, crowbars, not to mention guns, crossbows, bows & arrows (murder weapons) telephones (extortion, blackmail, various scams) cell phones (extortion, blackmail, scams, remote bomb detonators) the entire Internet (copyright infringement-Horrors!) cars, trucks, other motor vehicles (transport of drugs, cigarettes, getaway for bank robberies and other criminal activities) ...
I could go on and on with this, but my point is, any and every legally useful object and device in the world has some potential criminal use someone can find for it. If we're going to outlaw everything that has some potential criminal use for it, there won't be much left. In fact we'll be just about back to the stone age, only without the sticks and stones (you can kill somebody with them, remember?).
[Sarcasm]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]