Can Congress Work Like A Tech Startup?

from the as-long-as-they-don't-drop-vowels dept

Thu, May 10th 2012 1:55pm — Mike Masnick

We've discussed a few times in the past Rep. Darryl Issa's Madison platform for crowdsourcing ideas around legislation. Over the last few months he's used it to create a productive discussion around the OPEN Act, the more reasonable alternative to SOPA/PIPA, and also used it to post the text of ACTA for discussion. While the platform may need some tweaking and advancement, it's still quite a feat to see someone in Congress actually innovating, and that should be encouraged. Joshua Lamel -- who admits that he's politically at the other end of the spectrum from Rep. Issa -- has a really nice profile of how Issa is trying to treat his job in the House like a "lean startup," with projects like Madison. It is a bit of a slog going up against the entrenched ways that Congress acts today, however:

"I try to bring a lean startup mentality to my work making government more efficient, open and participatory," he said.

"This technology-centered approach, however, is disruptive to the government bureaucracy and many in Congress because it demands experimentation, data-driven analysis and actually listening to our users -- the American people -- about how to make government work better for them. That's why social media and innovation are so central to my work: we in Congress do not have all the answers, but we can have a relentless drive to adapt technology to let taxpayers re-engage with government on their own terms. I firmly believe that just as new technologies are revolutionizing nearly every aspect of life in America, nascent tools like Madison show the transformative impact technology will have on government, and ultimately overcome the inertia of the bureaucracy."

While not a traditional industry, it sure seems like Congress could use some significant disruption -- and having people in there treating it like a startup might just be a good way to start.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: acta, congress, crowdsourcing, darryl issa, madison platform, open act, pipa, sopa, startups

18 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

:Lobo Santo (profile), 10 May 2012 @ 2:01pm

Can Congress Work Like A Tech Startup? NO.
..."is disruptive to the government bureaucracy and many in Congress because it demands experimentation, data-driven analysis and actually listening to our users..."
Our Congress operates like a "too big to fail" monopoly entity and any good cynical realist must point out that that sort of thinking would end corruption. Therefore, not going to happen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
AG Wright (profile), 10 May 2012 @ 2:13pm

No they can't
Congress is not selected for intelligence, as most tech employees are but for electability.
Sometimes they can be intelligent but it is an accident and many times makes for short tenures.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
arcan, 10 May 2012 @ 2:18pm

he is the representative congress needs but not the one it deserves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jeremy Collake, 10 May 2012 @ 2:18pm

Apples and Oranges. Nuff said.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Liz (profile), 10 May 2012 @ 2:44pm
  
  Re:
  Both grow on trees. Both start as flowers. Both are fruit. Both produce seeds (except Naval Oranges). Both are round. Both are nutritious.
  
  I don't get the analogy.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - JP, 10 May 2012 @ 2:49pm
    
    Re: Re:
    But, but... color!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Richard (profile), 10 May 2012 @ 2:59pm
    
    Re: Re:
    http://improbable.com/airchives/paperair/volume1/v1i3/air-1-3-apples.html
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - A Guy (profile), 10 May 2012 @ 7:28pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      That was exactly what I thought of too.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
weneedhelp (profile), 10 May 2012 @ 2:28pm

Can congress work
No. Not in its current form.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2012 @ 2:37pm

Good to see Rep. Issa using Madison for all the bills he sponsors, like CISPA, which probably explains why it received so much support from the internet community. Wait, that didn't happen? Say, you don't think Issa's just going for cheap political points here, do you? I mean, that doesn't sound like something a politician would do...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dave Reed, 10 May 2012 @ 2:42pm

Disruptive Technology
Just for the record, at one time, the US Constitution WAS a Governmental Disruptive Technology. Heck, it was Version 2.x (how do you count the Bill of Rights? ) as the Articles of the Confederacy was version 1.

And remember how much fuss-and-bother there was getting ver 1 installed?

Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
John F. Kennedy, In a speech at the White House, 1962
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Overcast (profile), 10 May 2012 @ 3:21pm

That would require planning, responsibility, ethics, and such. Most of which has no place in congress.

Conceptually, it would be a great idea - in reality, the chances of it happening are a bit less than snowfall in hell.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
cjstg (profile), 10 May 2012 @ 3:22pm

name sounds familiar
isn't this the guy using religion to wage war on women? that's certainly innovative. sorta like the v2 project was innovative.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mason Wheeler, 10 May 2012 @ 3:33pm

OPEN
Please don't go legitimizing OPEN like that. Just because it's marginally less offensive than SOPA and PIPA doesn't mean it's "a reasonable alternative." It's still based on the false premise that a piracy crisis exists that requires stronger legislative protections to defend IP interests against their users.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- MattP, 11 May 2012 @ 10:51am
  
  Re: OPEN
  "more reasonable" doesn't mean that it's the right solution, it just means that it's closer than the alternative.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 10 May 2012 @ 7:00pm

We can change things by changing the field.

Don't play in congress, play it in the streets, in the open.

The same tools people use to write open source code can be used to write any code and that means laws.

But that is not enough, politicians are only part of the problem, they are not experts in every field and so they rely on others expertise those others are the positions that people with power target and they put their people in there, that is what the revolving door is for, we also need to map the political landscape to see what is happening.

Politicians in a sense are just distractions, the real people formulating the policies are hidden is time to shine light on those people and open discussion and mapping are key to that effort.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
OLawD, 10 May 2012 @ 7:37pm

Madison isn't OPEN enough
We are working on an open source platform similar to Madison (but you know actually useful for 99% of people not just what Rep. Issa plans to put up for review)

Come check us out and make feature requests!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bob Webster (profile), 11 May 2012 @ 5:40pm

The first three words...
Can Congress work?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]