Can Congress Work Like A Tech Startup?
from the as-long-as-they-don't-drop-vowels dept
We've discussed a few times in the past Rep. Darryl Issa's Madison platform for crowdsourcing ideas around legislation. Over the last few months he's used it to create a productive discussion around the OPEN Act, the more reasonable alternative to SOPA/PIPA, and also used it to post the text of ACTA for discussion. While the platform may need some tweaking and advancement, it's still quite a feat to see someone in Congress actually innovating, and that should be encouraged. Joshua Lamel -- who admits that he's politically at the other end of the spectrum from Rep. Issa -- has a really nice profile of how Issa is trying to treat his job in the House like a "lean startup," with projects like Madison. It is a bit of a slog going up against the entrenched ways that Congress acts today, however:"I try to bring a lean startup mentality to my work making government more efficient, open and participatory," he said.While not a traditional industry, it sure seems like Congress could use some significant disruption -- and having people in there treating it like a startup might just be a good way to start.
"This technology-centered approach, however, is disruptive to the government bureaucracy and many in Congress because it demands experimentation, data-driven analysis and actually listening to our users -- the American people -- about how to make government work better for them. That's why social media and innovation are so central to my work: we in Congress do not have all the answers, but we can have a relentless drive to adapt technology to let taxpayers re-engage with government on their own terms. I firmly believe that just as new technologies are revolutionizing nearly every aspect of life in America, nascent tools like Madison show the transformative impact technology will have on government, and ultimately overcome the inertia of the bureaucracy."
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: acta, congress, crowdsourcing, darryl issa, madison platform, open act, pipa, sopa, startups
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Can Congress Work Like A Tech Startup? NO.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No they can't
Sometimes they can be intelligent but it is an accident and many times makes for short tenures.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I don't get the analogy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Can congress work
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Disruptive Technology
And remember how much fuss-and-bother there was getting ver 1 installed?
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
John F. Kennedy, In a speech at the White House, 1962
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Conceptually, it would be a great idea - in reality, the chances of it happening are a bit less than snowfall in hell.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
name sounds familiar
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
OPEN
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: OPEN
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't play in congress, play it in the streets, in the open.
The same tools people use to write open source code can be used to write any code and that means laws.
But that is not enough, politicians are only part of the problem, they are not experts in every field and so they rely on others expertise those others are the positions that people with power target and they put their people in there, that is what the revolving door is for, we also need to map the political landscape to see what is happening.
Politicians in a sense are just distractions, the real people formulating the policies are hidden is time to shine light on those people and open discussion and mapping are key to that effort.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Madison isn't OPEN enough
Come check us out and make feature requests!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The first three words...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]