Don't You Dare Show Olympic Spirit In The UK
from the from-pistil-to-pulpit dept
We've spent plenty of time over the years highlighting the ridiculousness surrounding the Olympics and their over-aggressive enforcement of IP laws (and even getting host nations to pass special trademark laws that only apply to the Olympics in some cases). But it's really reaching positively ludicrous excesses in the UK. First up, a story of a flower shop being threatened for making a version of the Olympic logo out of tissue paper and hanging it in the shop window. You see, that kind of Olympic pride is only allowed if you've paid for the permission.That story led us to an even crazier one. Apparently an 81-year old woman tried to sell a £1 doll at a church sale... but had it shut down because she'd dared to clothe the doll in a home made knit sweater that had a mini-Olympic logo on it.
It appears that they've turned this 81-year-old into someone who has realized the absurdity of over aggressive intellectual property protection:
The 81-year-old grandmother of six from King’s Lynn said the last thing she wanted to do was cause a crisis but attacked the rules as 'absolutely ridiculous.It seems that the Olympics would prefer that no one actually show any sort of pride or support for the Olympics unless it's an official sponsor who paid for the privilege.
'I thought that the hoops symbol was universal and I think it is disgusting that they can make rules about such little things, she said.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: london, olympics, sponsorship, uk
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Am I the only one who thinks the Olympic committee has lacked imagination for the past 30 years?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Chicago wanted it real bad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
IOC is forever in debt to AOC.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
> spat between IOC and AOC.
Well, that and the fact that the sort of laws the IOC requires countries pass in order to host the Olympics can't be passed in America.
They apparently require counties to provide police with the power to enter private property without warrant and confiscate private property with no due process-- all to protect sponsor exclusivity.
We've lost a lot in the realm of civil liberties lately (TSA, etc.), but that kind of nonsense is violates about 60% of the Bill of Rights and wouldn't last 10 seconds in a court challenge.
As long as the IOC expects that sort of thing from host countries, America will never be able to host another Olympics.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
St. Louis
Lake Placid (x2)
Los Angeles (x2)
Olympic Valley
Salt Lake City
Atlanta
Tell me again that U.S. laws wouldn't bend if they had to? Because they have in the past just fine. (Before you tell me these rules are new, ask me about what it was like to live in Atlanta during the games.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Show me an instance in any of those cities where the laws were changed to provide police with the power to enter private property without warrant and confiscate private property with no due process-- all to protect sponsor exclusivity.
And since any such law would violate the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution, no individual city, county, or state even has the legal power to pass one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Everyone in our media (especially the damn BBC) and Government are all in collective denial about what a waste of time and money it is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
They try to claim its only £15 billion by ignoring everything except the physical structure of the stadiums (which are being sold for literally £1 after the games are over - which was the whole point - cream billions off the public to build something then sell it back to yourself for a nominal sum)...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Boring. I want my money back.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Broken record much
Its actually pathetically funny, do you think your having some sort of an affect or is it that you think you're NOT having as much as an affect as you'd like?
Either way, good luck with that
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
inb4 you got flagged
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If so I'm guessing you also bought the cassette, CD and MP3 to avoid any allegations of format shifting?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the UK government obviously panders to Big Games, the piper must be making a lot of money...just another Big Org getting to let loose in the UK
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We had the same problem
In one example, Olympia Pizza, which has been in business here for a very long time, was threatened with a shutdown if they didn't change their name (fortunately, a public outcry prevented that from happening).
The same scenario is played out everywhere, I suspect; we're just not allowed to hear about it outside of any city currently afflicted with a case of Olympics.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: We had the same problem
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: We had the same problem
All this IP shit by the Olympics really got started with the LA games where, among other things, they charged around collecting fees from everyone anywhere near infringing in that part of California demanded they close down or pay an enormous fee. That was part of the reason for the profit there. Well profit in the same way Vancouver/Whistler made a profit.
And you can bet your sweet bippie that the same shit is happening in Greater London right now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well, at least It's not a total loss.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Well, at least It's not a total loss.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Well, at least It's not a total loss.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Well, at least It's not a total loss.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
copyright or trademark
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A Great Injustice Has Been Done
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How about a little revenge.....
Please post on twitter support for non sponsors of the Olympics, in a way that will annoy the Olympic committee. Even better if you pick corporate giants which are not whiter than white too. E.g. "I'm drinking #Pepsi at the #london2012 Olympics" or "I'm running in my #Nike gear at #london2012"
possibly immature, but good fun!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How about a little revenge.....
http://www.london2012.com/about-us/the-people-delivering-the-games/olympic-partners/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How about a little revenge.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How about a little revenge.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
'Nuff said!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Too expensive and with ridiculous stuff like this going on it is all completely pointless and counter to what the Olympics is supposed to stand for.
The greatest sporting event in the world < sponsorship interests
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In the recent years I've been watching more and more bullshit go on with them, but this is the year I decided to stop watching and supporting them period.
If they want to act like this towards people they can go fuck themselves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
and the funniest part is
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: and the funniest part is
There have been Olympic fixes, but 75%? Really?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Another olympic 'f**k you'
When he contacted them, he was told that he was most welcome but he had to be at location before any public transport is available, was not allowed to park a car anywhere, had to provide all his own meals, refreshments etc, all for no wages and no contribution to his expenses.
When he protested, he ws basically told that he was lucky to be allowed to be part of the Olympics and they couldn't see the problem.
He decided there was better use for his time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They did not invent the term, they did not define the term, they did not popularize the term, they have added nothing to its value.
Who's leg did they hump to get what is really unprecedented control over the terminology of someone else's creation?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
tee hee
[ link to this | view in chronology ]