Google Asks For $4 Million In Legal Fees From Oracle
from the sliding-backwards dept
Having lost its patent/copyright case against Google in somewhat spectacular fashion, Oracle is now facing the possibility of having to also pay Google over $4 million in legal fees. Google has submitted its calculation of legal fees that it's seeking from Oracle, and it totals up to $4,030,669. Of course, this case is heading for appeal, so this number may be meaningless. However, it does suggest that Oracle -- which once seemed to believe this case might bring it billions of dollars -- may quickly discover that it's costing an awful lot instead...Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: api, appeal, damages, java
Companies: google, oracle
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Where
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
4 million
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 4 million
Alternatively, they could be trying to set a precedent for there being an actual punishment for patent trolling, instead of the nothing(or if the judge is really mad, a sternly worded rebuke for bringing the case up) there is now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: 4 million
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: 4 million
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: 4 million
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 4 million
$4 million may not be a lot to Google, but it might still be the cost of supporting some small 'free' service that people use and enjoy.
Is the economy so strong that we can encourage people to 'waste' $4 million?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 4 million
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 4 million
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 4 million
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: 4 million
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Only 4 million...
Also, $2.9m of that is apparently "Fees for exemplification and the costs of making copies of any materials where the copies are necessarily obtained for use in the case." - That's one expensive photocopier they've got there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Only 4 million...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Only 4 million...
http://www.geekshut.com/google-asks-for-4-million-in-legal-fees-from-oracle/2571
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Irrational
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Irrational
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Irrational
Usually judges and geek humor mix about as well as oil and water.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Irrational
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How are costs awarded in a mixed judgement?
Doesn't the fact that Oracle won on statutory infringement offset this?
This whole thing seems like a PR exercise than a matter of law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
formation référencement http://goo.gl/R2rTd cours référencement web
[ link to this | view in chronology ]